Otis
Well-Known Member
And we could be non league by then.
And we could be non league by then.Another thread on BPA. I will say although I live not too far from the Ricoh locationwise I'd love a home ground at the Butts which perhaps should have been seriously looked at years ago.Do people still think a major football stadium will get planning permission? and then get passed Westminster. Will take years
The onlyI wouldn't look too much into Ann's photo shoots.
Or worse, fuck there business model up,.That's what I'm saying.
I wouldn't want us to move in and then CRFC fans feel like we do with Wasps. Walking in to see massive CCFC badges and pictures of Sam Ricketts all over the place.
Probably dearer to buy them out than us.
And we could be non league by then.
That's not my attitude at all, is it.
A retirement village with a sports stadium on one side and busy railway line on the other, it was never going to be tranquil for people's salad days was it? Then look at the cost, "...prices for 40% shared ownership one bedroom properties start from £69,980..."
To me it seems the ones 'f**king' our senior citizens are the ones responsible for developing a completely inappropriate site - now let's see who was involved:
Oh... what a surprise!
Dunno he's wealthy but I wouldn't say stackedNow there's a thought
How much cash has Sharp got?
I wouldn't look too much into Ann's photo shoots.
Watch it Nick, you'll get kicked out the club with rational thought like that.
What's 'street' about that first picture Nick?
That's what I'm getting at by saying call their bluff on it.
Get the trust and local media pushing for it, say how great it would be to play at the Butts and see where it goes
Millerchip is already selling to Sharp, it just depends if he decides to try and put restrictions in to stop CCFC moving there. Which would be strange if he did.
Get behind what? A LR article and some factless comment's from TF to the SCG? What have we been given to get behind exactly? It's little more than a passing comment at this moment in time.
How long will it be before there is a campaign to stop Millerchip from selling, like the stuff about selling the Ricoh?
I really don't think you could blame any CRFC fan for not wanting their club to get involved with SISU. Stopping CM selling to JS or selling with strict conditions regarding involvement with SISU could be a way to resolve that. I certainly wouldn't wish SISU on anyone and I'd be surprised if you would either.
It also isn't just Fisher who has mentioned it.
which leads on to, yes fisher could be blagging to get a deal at the Ricoh.
So what is Sharp doing?
Apart from the fact he is a Wasps fan
Mentioned? You think that's enough to get a campaign behind?
That's what I'm saying.
I wouldn't want us to move in and then CRFC fans feel like we do with Wasps. Walking in to see massive CCFC badges and pictures of Sam Ricketts all over the place.
I'm talking about CRFC fans. What's Wasps got to do with them not wanting CRFC to get involved with SISU?
Hardly anyone can see it happening. But SISU have to do something. And this way they wouldn't have to pay for land to build upon. The cheapest way of 'Building our own stadium'.....although it wouldn't be our own.Another thread on BPA. I will say although I live not too far from the Ricoh locationwise I'd love a home ground at the Butts which perhaps should have been seriously looked at years ago.Do people still think a major football stadium will get planning permission? and then get passed Westminster. Will take years
Looking at the CT it says the Butts is an 8 acre site.I'm certain that 15k is nowhere near big enough to satiate CCFC fans. Sell out crowds every other week in a 15k capacity will kill off the other 10-15k potential crowds. Given a stable and good footing with crowd attendance, 25k should be minimum capacity.
Looking at the CT it says the Butts is an 8 acre site.
How many acres did Fisher say it was that they needed? And didn't he want the academy there at the new ground too? And how many acres did he say was needed for that?
Just looked back to September 2015 and the minutes of the meeting between Fisher and Rugby borough council.Looking at the CT it says the Butts is an 8 acre site.
How many acres did Fisher say it was that they needed? And didn't he want the academy there at the new ground too? And how many acres did he say was needed for that?
Just looked back to September 2015 and the minutes of the meeting between Fisher and Rugby borough council.
Fisher states there that the club need 60 acres, though it could be split over 2 30 acre sites.
So we need 60 acres, but the Butts is 8 acres.
Definitely going to work.
Unless of course Fisher was 'lying' again.
Here we go again.How long will it be before there is a campaign to stop Millerchip from selling, like the stuff about selling the Ricoh?
Just looked back to September 2015 and the minutes of the meeting between Fisher and Rugby borough council.
Fisher states there that the club need 60 acres, though it could be split over 2 30 acre sites.
So we need 60 acres, but the Butts is 8 acres.
Definitely going to work.
Unless of course Fisher was 'lying' again.
pitching for a 15K stadium would show a sever lack of ambition.I'm not disputing that Otis. I'm just saying any 15k capacity stadium, isn't big enough to accomodate the crowds that CCFC could potentially generate
Here we go again.
I was one that didn't want SISU to get 100% of the Ricoh. My reasoning was they would pile debt on it and we would lose it. They didn't get it. Wasps did. And what did they do before the ink was even dry?
I'm certain that 15k is nowhere near big enough to satiate CCFC fans. Sell out crowds every other week in a 15k capacity will kill off the other 10-15k potential crowds. Given a stable and good footing with crowd attendance, 25k should be minimum capacity.
Our ambitions were severed about 9 years ago......pitching for a 15K stadium would show a sever lack of ambition.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?