No future with SISU
New Member
Optimistic. I would say 83%
Nick was been a comic when he said 90%, are you for real. About 5% of fans like SISU and that may be a bit high.
Optimistic. I would say 83%
It's almost like you weren't complaining like buggery about our "low" wage bill when we got relegated despite it being more than our total turnover isn't it?
Weird. Just what some praise Richardson for.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
So you actually believe that the clubs turnover was in fact £24-25m not £10.8m in 2012/13? That goes against all of the figures OSB has put forward. Yes, talk about people believing what they want to believe....
You are classic, Ranson left as SISU would not let him run the club his way and now you try and make out CCFC stopped paying the rent. NEWS is SISU told them to stop paying and as SISU own CCFC it is them who stopped paying.It was CCFC who withheld the rent, not SISU
You are classic, Ranson left as SISU would not let him run the club his way and now you try and make out CCFC stopped paying the rent. NEWS is SISU told them to stop paying and as SISU own CCFC it is them who stopped paying.
And the lease will revert back to the council as the freehold owners.Maybe, but potentially (if the bail out is found illegal state aid) ACL could be forced to repay the money and look for a new (private sector) lender.
That may be very difficult without the main tenant - ACL could potentially go bust.
Ranson was an incompetent idiot. It figures you liked him.
Ranson was an incompetent idiot. It figures you liked him.
Ranson was an incompetent idiot. It figures you liked him.
Ranson was an incompetent idiot. It figures you liked him.
Any support provided by the
council to a trading company counts as
assistance – whether in cash or in kind.
Significant subsidies in grants, assets,
services or kind could be deemed State aid
which is regulated under European
competition rules to stop contractors gaining
an unfair advantage over others. If the total
adds up to more than €200,000 the council
may need to seek permission to proceed
from the European Commission.
To avoid State aid issues, the trading
company should pay commercial rates for all
staff time, premises, payroll, finance, HR,
assets, access to IT systems and other
support that it gets from the local authority.
The council should avoid treating a trading
company more favourably than it would treat any other third party contractor.
Ranson could not do anything as the SISU guy on CCFC board kept blocking his ideas. It is why he resigned.
In fairness he was one of a few SISU appointed failures at the time. Orange Ken, Igne, 'Text in a sub' Brodie. It sometimes amazes me that folk will readily hark back to Richardson and gloss over what happened early-doors with SISU officers.
In fairness he was one of a few SISU appointed failures at the time. Orange Ken, Igne, 'Text in a sub' Brodie. It sometimes amazes me that folk will readily hark back to Richardson and gloss over what happened early-doors with SISU officers.
We'd be a damn site better if we'd never seen Sisu to hire these people..
Yup, their selection of bedfellows not the best.
Ironic that away from the obvious(!) Fisher actually seems the most competent of them all!
A bit like saying I prefer cat shit to dog shit that, though.
Put it down to who you like to suit whatever opinion you have, but you know who has the biggest say on how the club is ran and it isn't or wasn't RR..
Ranson did plenty.
Appointed crap managers
Sanctioned the signing of dross players - most notably Eastwood
Made loans to the club with interesting interest rates
Failed to sell any players for significant transfer fees
The list is endless
Incompetent, useless and we'd be a damn site better off if we'd never seen the sight of him.
there is a cieling of 200,000 euros. after which you need european commision permision, there is no way the council have complied
the problem for ccc is the fact they offered so much and kept the matter a secret from SISU, its anti competitive because SISU were making a play for the ownership of the ricoh, the non payment of rent was not about the rent it was a targeted action to bring down the price of ACL. CCC acted to take the price of ACL back up ... hence all the quotes of 6 million and 12 million etc... CCC faced losing a large amount of money if SISU aquired ACL. Hence the action it took - so it also hiked up its own company worth but by means of public cash not private cash .. . .. in other words state aid.
Local authorities can run business, but they can not use public moneys to do so they are supposed to use banks and act as a tradinig company .
local authority trading companies: here :: https://www.gov.uk/state-aid
there is a cieling of 200,000 euros. after which you need european commision permision, there is no way the council have complied
the problem for ccc is the fact they offered so much and kept the matter a secret from SISU, its anti competitive because SISU were making a play for the ownership of the ricoh, the non payment of rent was not about the rent it was a targeted action to bring down the price of ACL. CCC acted to take the price of ACL back up ... hence all the quotes of 6 million and 12 million etc... CCC faced losing a large amount of money if SISU aquired ACL. Hence the action it took - so it also hiked up its own company worth but by means of public cash not private cash .. . .. in other words state aid.
Local authorities can run business, but they can not use public moneys to do so they are supposed to use banks and act as a tradinig company .
local authority trading companies: here :: https://www.gov.uk/state-aid
there is a cieling of 200,000 euros. after which you need european commision permision, there is no way the council have complied
the problem for ccc is the fact they offered so much and kept the matter a secret from SISU, its anti competitive because SISU were making a play for the ownership of the ricoh, the non payment of rent was not about the rent it was a targeted action to bring down the price of ACL. CCC acted to take the price of ACL back up ... hence all the quotes of 6 million and 12 million etc... CCC faced losing a large amount of money if SISU aquired ACL. Hence the action it took - so it also hiked up its own company worth but by means of public cash not private cash .. . .. in other words state aid.
Local authorities can run business, but they can not use public moneys to do so they are supposed to use banks and act as a tradinig company .
local authority trading companies: here :: https://www.gov.uk/state-aid
Ranson did plenty.
Appointed crap managers
Sanctioned the signing of dross players - most notably Eastwood
Made loans to the club with interesting interest rates
Failed to sell any players for significant transfer fees
The list is endless
Incompetent, useless and we'd be a damn site better off if we'd never seen the sight of him.
What was the last football match to reach 800+ posts on a thread?
Not that I disagree. But how many of them have changed since he left?