You seriously underestimate the impact of a manager if you think our form was because of McG, rather than MR, it's a very naive viewpoint, because if what you're saying is true, then Thorn or Shaw would've got exactly the same results with McG? Rubbish. Secondly, considering McG got 1 assist (in the league), how did Baker go on a similar goal rampage in the November-December period!? MR was so much more influential than McG, firstly for McG, the system suited him, McG came out and publicly praised his methods, MR signed players which strengthened the squad, Moussa, Bailey, Adams (3 of the 4 we had to keep on in January). The manager is responsible for everything that goes on durning the match, team talks, individual roles, MR was the main reason we did well, without a doubt. Perhaps he could've done better and probably would've had he'd had the summer transfer window, because Thorn was just plain wasteful with out resources.
For those who listen to the Nii Lamptey show, they worked out if you wiped all of McG's goals, we'd only lose 9 points. Case closed.
Only 9 points - not brilliant then without McGoldrick, probably would have been hovering just above the relegation zone.
Even after McG, we were still picking up points and Clarke was scoring goals for us, from January, to late Feb (after SP's 1st game so about 6-7 weeks), he scored 8 goals and was on course to smash his Scunny record, had his injury not kept him out, so on Leon Clarke, you don't know what you're talking about.