covcity4life
Well-Known Member
yeah that makes sense. soon as your argument shot down just pretend you are right anyway.
He did say that said there was more money available I think from sky/premier than people think or something like thatI will have look in a minute but I am sure someone said he said that
He did say that said there was more money available I think from sky/premier than people think or something like that
anyone who believes anderson must be bullying stupot
Give it a rest.
He did say that said there was more money available I think from sky/premier than people think or something like that
How do clubs in LEague 1 get money from the Premier League? Or does he mean things like Parachute Payments?
Doesn't some of the money from the rights to TV coverage of the premier league filter down the leagues? It doesn't all stay with the premier league although the premier league takes the lions share?
why? hate the truth? that was my original point after all before you jumped in escalate matters
wipe the egg of your face and move on and i will too
How do clubs in LEague 1 get money from the Premier League? Or does he mean things like Parachute Payments?
No, I am just getting fed up of cringing at the stuff you keep posting that pretty much everybody but you can see right through.
i will ask you again. please stop bullying me.
Sorry was talking about championship
Ah so the parachute payments for the relegated teams.
I thought that as well. I thought this outrageous deal the premier league negotiated includes a trickle down to all teams in the championship
If I remember he said it was a lot more obviously nowhere near the amount that the clubs coming down from the premier get
Next year even the club who finishes bottom will get £99M. How can we ever hope to compete with that?
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
By selling our better players cheap and often, thought you had realised that?Next year even the club who finishes bottom will get £99M. How can we ever hope to compete with that?
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
By selling our better players cheap and often, thought you had realised that?
Is it not what SISU historically do?You clearly have insider knowledge on this deal and have every detail on it as you perceive it to be cheap.
Can you share it with everyone else?
Next year even the club who finishes bottom will get £99M. How can we ever hope to compete with that?
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
Mowbray was saying as recently as 21st January that as far as he was aware we had no need to sell.
This leaves two options:
1) Our budgeting was so poor that despite increasing crowds roughly 40%, we were short of cash.
2) Mowbray was lied to.
Neither of which fill me with confidence in our leadership team.
Next year even the club who finishes bottom will get £99M. How can we ever hope to compete with that?
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
Did he say how much they put in or what it was for?
As many others have said, including me, it was a positive session but the proof of the pudding will be in the eating.
does a part of callum's transfer fee equate as "extra funds"
One of the points that CA made on parachute payments are that they are not necessarily as wonderful as they sound. Relegated clubs often have major costs related to their relegation beyond their normal running costs. The cost of wages of players they cannot get rid of, contract payoffs for players that leave. How often do relegated clubs get immediate promotion back to back to the Prem and how many find themselves in dire straits even with the payments, Fulham, Wolves and us leap to mind? His point about the budget when we get promoted was that it would probably be mid-table in the budgets league.
As for the self-sustaining bit where has that come from? I remember Fisher saying that we were cash flow neutral but he didn't appear to have any idea that that meant...it certainly does not mean self-sustaining.
The other thing that CA said that I'm a little surprised that no-one has mentioned, is that the 'owners' had put further funds into the club in the last year. (Not sure whether that meant last season, last financial year or calendar year). If that's true then it should show up in the accounts sometime in the future.)
As many others have said, including me, it was a positive session but the proof of the pudding will be in the eating.
This is a reference to a comment CA made that as a percentage of the clubs income no club in League 1 relied on ticket sales more than us except for some reason Millwall, others had other off field sources.
Yes it was, but it's a new man in charge now. Like he's said, what's done is done. This is the now. The club is trying to rebuild its reputation, it's only talked down by so-called fans rather than the population at large.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?