Would like him to stay as he obviously very talented striker (if he can change his attitude , work rate).
Would not want him to go on loan at any of our rivals.
With Barrett and Maguire-Drew (potentially) into the fold now we are just a striker away from a complete team now, personally don’t think Nazon will be missed if he does go especially with the potential of Baker coming in as well
Need more than one scoring striker, can’t pin all our promotion hopes on McNultyYou mean the striker we already have on 12 goals? His name is McNulty
Would like him to stay as he obviously very talented striker (if he can change his attitude , work rate).
Would not want him to go on loan at any of our rivals.
so expect some League One side to snap him up.
We don't have to! We have Biamou remember!!Need more than one scoring striker, can’t pin all our promotion hopes on McNulty
No danger I don't think. Wolves have said they want to see him play at a higher level, so expect some League One side to snap him up.
Need more than one scoring striker, can’t pin all our promotion hopes on McNulty
TBF no one trusted MR when he said McNulty would come good.We don't have to! We have Biamou remember!!
TBF no one trusted MR when he said McNulty would come good.
He saw something in him.
Maybe after a goal Biamou will get a little run going too
He'll stay? He's gone back to Wolves and they have said they want to see him play at a higher level.Maybe I'm reading it differently, but to me it sounds fairly likely he'll stay with us. I like the player because he can sometimes do the unexpected, but I hardly think he's done so well here that higher-level clubs will be queuing up for him.
Can only presume that if we lose him there are other irons in the fire, and he's not exactly irreplaceable.
He'll stay? He's gone back to Wolves and they have said they want to see him play at a higher level.
I would say his chances of coming back are no better than 0.00000000000000001%.
It says City are understood to be continuing talks with Molineux chiefs about an extension.
Robins: “I know their sporting director Kevin Thelwell really well and unless there’s a reason for them to move him on I think the appetite will be for him to stay with us.
But, again, if a team from a higher division come in for him then it might change things.”
So it’s not cut and dried. If Wolves can find a higher-level taker, he’ll probably go to them – but I’m still not sure he’s done enough with us to catch many people’s eye. And Wolves will obviously want to be sure he gets game time wherever he goes, which we’ve shown he will do here.
Having run the various factors through the special data analysis system I set up for this purpose, I’d put the chances of him staying at 0.57%
It says City are understood to be continuing talks with Molineux chiefs about an extension.
Robins: “I know their sporting director Kevin Thelwell really well and unless there’s a reason for them to move him on I think the appetite will be for him to stay with us.
But, again, if a team from a higher division come in for him then it might change things.”
So it’s not cut and dried. If Wolves can find a higher-level taker, he’ll probably go to them – but I’m still not sure he’s done enough with us to catch many people’s eye. And Wolves will obviously want to be sure he gets game time wherever he goes, which we’ve shown he will do here.
Having run the various factors through the special data analysis system I set up for this purpose, I’d put the chances of him staying at 0.57%
I didn’t see that. Maybe the CT article has been updated.It says City are understood to be continuing talks with Molineux chiefs about an extension.
Robins: “I know their sporting director Kevin Thelwell really well and unless there’s a reason for them to move him on I think the appetite will be for him to stay with us.
But, again, if a team from a higher division come in for him then it might change things.”
So it’s not cut and dried. If Wolves can find a higher-level taker, he’ll probably go to them – but I’m still not sure he’s done enough with us to catch many people’s eye. And Wolves will obviously want to be sure he gets game time wherever he goes, which we’ve shown he will do here.
Having run the various factors through the special data analysis system I set up for this purpose, I’d put the chances of him staying at 0.57%
I didn’t see that. Maybe the CT article has been updated.
I take it back then and promote the chances to the dizzy heights of 3.5%
Or maybe it is an old story like Nick says.
You amaze me.a Mick Ferguson or a Garry Thompson or a Mark Hateley or a Dion Dublin !
Biamou is not in the same class as the above !
Yeah, apologies, I thought the quotes sounded a bit familiar! God, that's deceptive recycled journalism from Andy Turner, although to be fair I normally like his coverage of things. The bit where it says "Speaking last month" looks like a standalone paragraph, but I suspect you're right in that it relates to whole of the rest of the article i.e. about two thirds of it!Wasn't that said a while ago before the whole Carlisle / Morecambe / New Years Eve stuff?
What we actually need is a Big Centre Forward who is strong and good at holding the ball up for McNulty and are midfield .
Like a Mick Ferguson or a Garry Thompson or a Mark Hateley or a Dion Dublin !
Biamou is not in the same class as the above !
The Academy is producing some good kids , but not a big Centre Forward, probably hard to come by or are being poached by the bigger clubs .
We don't want a bad apple, yet some are calling for Kyel Reid's return.Nazon looks like a bad apple, it’s time to move him on, I wouldn’t want someone with a bad attitude in the squad.
We are desperate for a big dominant centre forward, and mcnulty or ponticelli
To feed off him.
Reid’s not a bad apple, he’s a whole bad fucking orchard!We don't want a bad apple, yet some are calling for Kyel Reid's return.
We don't want a bad apple, yet some are calling for Kyel Reid's return.
Certainly hope so. Retrograde step bringing him back.Think the 2 recent loan signings kill off any chance of a Reid return.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?