Martin180
Well-Known Member
I wouldn't , we've moved on and are recruiting better than at this stage last season . Panzo was ultimately a bad loan and didn't really offer anything for the second half of the season
I wouldn't , we've moved on and are recruiting better than at this stage last season . Panzo was ultimately a bad loan and didn't really offer anything for the second half of the seasonI think he lost confidence for a spell then lost his place. I think he has ability but I'd only sign him permanently not on loan
Really weirdThe McNally obsession is weird
Fair assessment but I don't see massive improvement in PanzoPanzo was fine, Doyle was just really, really good. No shame in not being able to get in the team 2nd half of last season
I still disagree with you.I wouldn't , we've moved on and are recruiting better than at this stage last season . Panzo was ultimately a bad loan and didn't really offer anything for the second half of the season
They play different sides of the defence ffsAbsolutely
Yeah hopefully BinksCould do better also
Superb maybe a bit strong but he was good yesSuperb ?
Our upturn in form coincided with him being dropped for better technical players in Doyle and McNally
I hope we avoid getting him back
he was really good at times as wellFair assessment but I don't see massive improvement in Panzo
Where exactly ?So much improvement in Panzo to come
Did you watch him on that great run we had pre World Cup!Where exactly ?
I think if we're getting another lcb it needs to be a more experienced player as when Fadz is out our back line is very younghe was really good at times as well
just because because our young player of the year was better doesn't mean he wasn't good
He was in the side in the first upturn in form.Superb ?
Our upturn in form coincided with him being dropped for better technical players in Doyle and McNally
I hope we avoid getting him back
No I do get that point, so you’d say no to the Chelsea guy?I think if we're getting another lcb it needs to be a more experienced players as when Fadz is out our back line is very young
I was asking where the massive improvement was to come ?Did you watch him on that great run we had pre World Cup!
he’s a good player
Technically inept? Im sorry I disagree with thatI was asking where the massive improvement was to come ?
He was athletic and physical but technically inept , improving that is difficult in the short term
No I definitely wouldn't as he is superb but without Fadz and Bidwell our back 5 would have an average age of 22/23No I do get that point, so you’d say no to the Chelsea guy?
Have you seen him play?No I definitely wouldn't as he is superb but without Fadz and Bidwell our back 5 would have an average age of 22/23
Technically inept? okI was asking where the massive improvement was to come ?
He was athletic and physical but technically inept , improving that is difficult in the short term
Honestly don’t get the criticism of PanzoTechnically inept? ok
We’re looking at him basicallyWhat does the tweet say?
Im saying I would take him , you asked if I would be opposed to it and I said I definitely wouldn't beHave you seen him play?
Yes I read themIm saying I would take him , you asked if I would be opposed to it and I said I definitely wouldn't be
Please read the replies
No you asked if I would take Humphries after I stated I would prefer an experienced playerYes I read them
you said you wanted experience ie no Panzo but you want humphries so you’ve contradicted yourself
Panzo would be a great permanent addition, clear to see he has a great relationship with Adi tooNo you asked if I would take Humphries after I stated I would prefer an experienced player
I would absolutely take Humphries but worry about the age and experience of our back line without another older head
Please read the replies
also in the play-off final if the Luton doesn't slam dunk the ball he's flicked over him and everything is fineI think people's perspective of Panzo is poisoned by a recency bias, particularly after what happened in the play-off final. He wasn't actually a bad player, he just fell out of form and was probably lacking in confidence after being displaced by Callum Doyle (who was class) in the latter half of the season. Realistically, as a left-footed CB around the age of 22-23, he currently fits our model of recruitment, and I think people have written him off far too soon. There's no doubt a decent player there imo. Definitely wouldn't mind having him back, especially for some much needed squad depth in the defensive department.
Alternatively, I also wouldn't mind taking a punt at Humphreys who would seem to offer some potentially similar qualities minus the trauma attached to Panzo due to that play-off incident
Panzo would be a great permanent addition, clear to see he has a great relationship with Adi too
The other centre backs were really good that day remember Davidalso in the play-off final if the Luton doesn't slam dunk the ball he's flicked over him and everything is fine
Its a loan deal being rumoured ?Panzo would be a great permanent addition, clear to see he has a great relationship with Adi too
So you would have played Panzo in the playoff final ?The other centre backs were really good that day remember David
Not necessarily, said a loan deal to rangers collapsed but nothing elseIts a loan deal being rumoured ?
No I wouldn’t have, because Doyle is betterSo you would have played Panzo in the playoff final ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?