Pato (28 Viewers)

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
Am I missing something? He's a less than 1 in 6 striker, spent most of his career in the championship, now he's 33 and just been released by an MLS side?

It's like we're back in L1/L2 again. I'd rather keep BTA.



Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk
He's not a striker, he's a LW who can also play in the number 10 role.
 

Nick

Administrator
Am I missing something? He's a less than 1 in 6 striker, spent most of his career in the championship, now he's 33 and just been released by an MLS side?

It's like we're back in L1/L2 again. I'd rather keep BTA.



Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk

Isn't he pretty much an AM / LW rather than a striker?

Not sure about "spending most of his career in the championship" being a negative, when people have been saying we are crying out for experience.

He may turn out dog shit, he may be half decent playing in an AM role. Who knows.
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
O’Hare had one of the best natural work rates I’ve ever seen. He also didn’t do much work in our own penalty box. I’ve no idea why we’d expect a post-MLS Jamie Paterson to start now.
I partly agree with you SBT, but that being said FL will have seen a lot of Paterson on the training ground in the last seven days, I am sure if he is signing him it's based on what he can see on the training ground and where he think's Paterson might play a part.
 

Perennial Lurker

Well-Known Member
I partly agree with you SBT, but that being said FL will have seen a lot of Paterson on the training ground in the last seven days, I am sure if he is signing him it's based on what he can see on the training ground and where he think's Paterson might play a part.
Or we haven't got a pot to piss in and he's the cheapest available option?
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
I partly agree with you SBT, but that being said FL will have seen a lot of Paterson on the training ground in the last seven days, I am sure if he is signing him it's based on what he can see on the training ground and where he think's Paterson might play a part.
I can see how he’d fit in as an experienced replacement for Palmer’s minutes at AM, but he clearly has a lot of work to do to get match fit, and hopefully he’d take a wage cut.
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
Or we haven't got a pot to piss in and he's the cheapest available option?
Okay, so haven't got a pot to piss in potentially, but Lampard is going to waste that money on a player who has barely played in America because he's cheap? Doesn't seem to make sense, Lampard has constantly said he wants to add and improve the group, which is why I believe (and I could be wrong) that FL thinks Paterson will add something.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
If this happens then he's cover at 10 and can sometimes allow Rudoni to play deeper

No anti Jamie Paterson but there are much more important positions to fill
 

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
I’m less against this signing than I was the signing of Wagehorn.

Has a decent scoring record in this division and if he can get up to speed in a month or two his ability to be composed in front of goal might help us. Probably not a starter though.
 

SkyBlueMatt

Well-Known Member
He's not a striker, he's a LW who can also play in the number 10 role.

He’s not a striker? Plays as a ten

Yea you are missing something because hes not a striker

Fair point, based on that, his goal contribution isn't bad. We don't need cover in his position though or at least we have bigger gaps.

Isn't he pretty much an AM / LW rather than a striker?

Not sure about "spending most of his career in the championship" being a negative, when people have been saying we are crying out for experience.

He may turn out dog shit, he may be half decent playing in an AM role. Who knows.

That's what we need, another LW.

There is nothing wrong with spending a career in the championship but he's 33 now and plays in an advanced position. He will be in decline and considering his highest level was where we are now. Feels like a Derby/Plymouth/Oxford type signing or L1.

We need experience but in the right places. I'd take a 33 year old Championship CB.



 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top