Put toBed Once and for all then (2 Viewers)

[wince]

The statement below has been issued by Sisu Capital, owners of Coventry City Football Club, this afternoon:

SISU Capital can confirm that it has had neither written nor verbal communication from Mr. Evans; hence, he has not made an offer to purchase Coventry City FC.

We would expect any potential purchaser to follow a professional and confidential process. Misleading public statements are a distraction to both the Club and fans, SISU IS CCFC and thus CCFC are Taking our Landlords to court

 

---

[blueflint]

The statement below has been issued by Sisu Capital, owners of Coventry City Football Club, this afternoon:

SISU Capital can confirm that it has had neither written nor verbal communication from Mr. Evans; hence, he has not made an offer to purchase Coventry City FC.

We would expect any potential purchaser to follow a professional and confidential process. Misleading public statements are a distraction to both the Club and fans, SISU IS CCFC and thus CCFC are Taking our Landlords to court

don't tell nick sisu are ccfc he'll do his nut

 

[fernandopartridge]

don't tell nick sisu are ccfc he'll do his nut

They're not though CCFC but they are the sole shareholder. Like if you wanted to buy Asda supermarket you wouldn't ask a store manager.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

 

[Liquid Gold]

don't tell nick sisu are ccfc he'll do his nut

Shit, someone should tell Dale Evans that he's trying to buy sisu.

 

[Irish Sky Blue]

Maybe that is the answer. Someone who loves the club buys Sisu.

 

[shmmeee]

They're not though CCFC but they are the sole shareholder. Like if you wanted to buy Asda supermarket you wouldn't ask a store manager.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Doesn’t Brody still own shares or has that changed?

 

[stupot07]

The statement below has been issued by Sisu Capital, owners of Coventry City Football Club, this afternoon:

SISU Capital can confirm that it has had neither written nor verbal communication from Mr. Evans; hence, he has not made an offer to purchase Coventry City FC.

We would expect any potential purchaser to follow a professional and confidential process. Misleading public statements are a distraction to both the Club and fans, SISU IS CCFC and thus CCFC are Taking our Landlords to court

A bit misleading. The last sentence was not in the statement.

Thus Sisu are the owners /sole shareholders of ccfc, they are not ccfc. The same way the Arcadia Group are owners of Burton, Topshop, etc they are not Burton, Topshop, etc. And if you wanted to by Burtons you would still need to talk to the Arcadia Group not the head of Burtons.

In fact the Arcadia Group getting taken to court by BHS liquidators, does not equate to Burtons, Topshop, etc are being taken to court by the BHS liquidators.


Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[Liquid Gold]

A bit misleading. The last sentence was not in the statement.

Thus Sisu are the owners /sole shareholders of ccfc, they are not ccfc. The same way the Arcadia Group are owners of Burton, Topshop, etc they are not Burton, Topshop, etc. And if you wanted to by Burtons you would still need to talk to the Arcadia Group not the head of Burtons.

In fact the Arcadia Group getting taken to court by BHS liquidators, does not equate to Burtons, Topshop, etc are being taken to court by the BHS liquidators.


Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Anybody with half a brain cell can understand it. I think people are being purposefully ignorant just to make a point.

 

[shmmeee]

A bit misleading. The last sentence was not in the statement.

Thus Sisu are the owners /sole shareholders of ccfc, they are not ccfc. The same way the Arcadia Group are owners of Burton, Topshop, etc they are not Burton, Topshop, etc. And if you wanted to by Burtons you would still need to talk to the Arcadia Group not the head of Burtons.

In fact the Arcadia Group getting taken to court by BHS liquidators, does not equate to Burtons, Topshop, etc are being taken to court by the BHS liquidators.


Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Well it sort of does. I mean whenever Alphabet are mentioned it’s taken as Google.

Do you shop as Tesco or Tesco PropCo who own the store or Tesco Dairies who supply the milk or Tesco Local who run the shop day to day?

CCFC are a subset of Sisu, Sisu are not CCFC but CCFC are a part of Sisu in the same way I am not my arm, but my arm is part of me.

We tend to refer to a group of companies as one, just as we refer to a collection of body parts as one.

(BTW: This is a stupid fucking argument with no right answer and absolutely no bearing on anything at all. )

 

[christonabike]

My head hurts what the fook is going on? Can’t get the 30 odd pages of shit arguments and the frothing at the mouth statements.
If it all settles please contact me at
Charles Hungerford
Windward house
Jersey
Channel Islands.
I will light a new cigar in anticipation. Jim Bergerac my son in law is on his way for his supper.
Pusb

 

[Deleted member 5849]

This is a stupid fucking argument

Welcome to skybluestalk.

 

[Calista]

Leaving aside the arguments about the SISU/CCFC relationship, the issued statemenrt does seem like a strangely specific denial of contact. Almost like saying, OK this guy may have had dialogue with people connected with the club, but as he hasn’t formally or specifically approached SISU Capital none of it counts.

Dale Evans seems to have acted like a bull in a china shop, which isn’t helpful but I’m hoping his intentions are good and hopefully Hoffman has now reined him in. I for one welcome anything, no matter how eccentric, which gives a glimmer of hope because there is absolutely nothing about the status quo I like.

 

[wince]

the point of the thread was dispel , the denial that ccfc are not part of sisu but here sisu confirm that they are , the fact that people can argue that, is mind boggling , there has been lots and lots of threads about the point , SISU
have confirmed lets move on

 

[stupot07]

the point of the thread was dispel , the denial that ccfc are not part of sisu but here sisu confirm that they are , the fact that people can argue that, is mind boggling , there has been lots and lots of threads about the point , SISU
have confirmed lets move on

No the point of the thread was to say sisu = ccfc. Ccfc = sisu. That's untrue.

All the statement confirms is Sisu own us. No one has ever disputed that.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[ccfcway]

that's 3 statements in less than a week.

for owners who are usually so silent, that's very unusual

 

[skybluedan]

View attachment 8254 My head hurts what the fook is going on? Can’t get the 30 odd pages of shit arguments and the frothing at the mouth statements.
If it all settles please contact me at
Charles Hungerford
Windward house
Jersey
Channel Islands.
I will light a new cigar in anticipation. Jim Bergerac my son in law is on his way for his supper.
Pusb

Sound mate I'm five minutes away I will be round shortly ,

 

[wince]

No the point of the thread was to say sisu = ccfc. Ccfc = sisu. That's untrue.

All the statement confirms is Sisu own us. No one has ever disputed that.

So you know more of the point of the thread than me , Fair play to you , that's why people like me don't post much theses days, not only do we not agree with you ,but we don't know why ,

 

[letsallsingtogether]

TBH.
who actually gives a fuck if Sisu and CCFC are the same?

Just wish sisu would fuck off.
Give us back our club and let us start building again before it is too late.
PUSB

 

[wince]

TBH.
who actually gives a fuck if Sisu and CCFC are the same?

Just wish sisu would fuck off.
Give us back our club and let us start building again before it is too late.
PUSB

TOP POST, stupot07 respect , you want to defend till the end , I want to change direction ASAP, as cov fans both right , that's football

 

[stupot07]

TOP POST, stupot07 respect , you want to defend till the end , I want to change direction ASAP, as cov fans both right , that's football

Hahahaha here we go "defending sisu" bollocks. Standard.

This is the reason I've stopped posting on non football related threads.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[Nick]

So you know more of the point of the thread than me , Fair play to you , that's why people like me don't post much theses days, not only do we not agree with you ,but we don't know why ,

You don't post much because you don't like people correcting you when you add stuff to statements or that some don't make sense?

 

[dongonzalos]

So you know more of the point of the thread than me , Fair play to you , that's why people like me don't post much theses days, not only do we not agree with you ,but we don't know why ,

You are about to go round in circles and more circles and more circles. Eventually you will have the point you were originally making changed into a different point. Then and only then, when you admit you are wrong can you leave the debate. It’s not worth it.
If you signed up to an important deal with CCFC, the top brass at SISU will say yes or no.
As a result of that deal if you get sued the top brass at SISU, will decide to sue you or not.
Long or short of it is, if you do an important deal with CCFC you are doing it with SISU.
If you sit/stand in the Ricoh singing about the villa SISU are the last thing on your mind.
Business and fans are two different things doing business with CCFC at an important level is doing business with SISU. Anyone denying that is just trying to win an argument, they can’t really believe what they are saying, surely?

 

[skybluetony176]

that's 3 statements in less than a week.

for owners who are usually so silent, that's very unusual

They seem more concerned about Dale Evans than they are about where we will be playing next season. If it’s a “distraction” it’s clearly welcome.

 

[dongonzalos]

Definition of distraction

We won’t be coming back to the Ricoh unless we are owners.
Plan A is a new stadium
Plan A is the Butts
Plan A is the Ricoh.
We have no choice we must leave coventry.
We can’t find any affordable land for the new stadium
Our new stadium has to be out of the jurustriction of CCC.
Our new stadium is going to be at the Butts.
Our new stadium has to be totally our own.
We will be renting off the Butts.
CCFC is not for sale.
Every league 1 club has its price.
SISU are suing the council not CCFC.
The company registered as owning CCFC now are suing CCC not CCFC.
We want a good relationship with Wasps.
We want Wasps to pay CCC 30 million if we will the legal action

However forget about the above, Dale is bloody distraction. Let’s just focus on the facts shall we....

 

[Nick]

You are about to go round in circles and more circles and more circles. Eventually you will have the point you were originally making changed into a different point. Then and only then, when you admit you are wrong can you leave the debate. It’s not worth it.
If you signed up to an important deal with CCFC, the top brass at SISU will say yes or no.
As a result of that deal if you get sued the top brass at SISU, will decide to sue you or not.
Long or short of it is, if you do an important deal with CCFC you are doing it with SISU.
If you sit/stand in the Ricoh singing about the villa SISU are the last thing on your mind.
Business and fans are two different things doing business with CCFC at an important level is doing business with SISU. Anyone denying that is just trying to win an argument, they can’t really believe what they are saying, surely?

Not going to disprove the multiple.posters then or actually make a point relevant?

 

[skybluetony176]

Not going to disprove the multiple.posters then or actually make a point relevant?

His point was relevant. Unlike multiple posters which while we’re talking about convenient distractions seems to a good one for you.

You’ll probably be the first one to blame Dale Evans for a bad performance while ignoring the multiple distractions created by our owners for what’s been years now.

 

[Nick]

His point was relevant. Unlike multiple posters which while we’re talking about convenient distractions seems to a good one for you.

You’ll probably be the first one to blame Dale Evans for a bad performance while ignoring the multiple distractions created by our owners for what’s been years now.

Was it? It's just that he seemed to have a massive issue with people replying to the guy who seemed to add his own stuff into the statement. Multiple people pointed out out to him. What's been changed in his post that people have replied to? The irony is the op actually changed the statement.

Who's posts weren't relevant?

Why would I blame him for us playing poorly? Very strange, why are you making things up?

Are you saying this is a setup from the ccfc side in some shape or form?

 

[Skyblueweeman]

They seem more concerned about Dale Evans than they are about where we will be playing next season. If it’s a “distraction” it’s clearly welcome.

Or, to be fair, they’re upping their communication game with the fans, like we’ve harked on about for the past few years. Maybe.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[bawtryneal]

Nick
Would it possible for you to go the whole weekend without analysing other posters words or comments and allow them to post freely without fear of being analysed to death.
Just a suggestion, like !!

 

[Nick]

Nick
Would it possible for you to go the whole weekend without analysing other posters words or comments and allow them to post freely without fear of being analysed to death.
Just a suggestion, like !!

Maybe read the thread. His op had already been analysed and commented on multiple times before I had even read it.

Why would somebody have an issue with somebody else reading their post and replying?

Maybe, just maybe don't make stuff up to look like part of statements and have a think before posting if they have an issue with people replying to them?

He has said it's why people don't post much, because stupot just used basic facts and common sense to reply to him. I'm not too sure what you suggest is done, should we just agree with people anybody when they just randomly say things and they get proven wrong.

 

[bawtryneal]

I am not just referring to this post but several over the last few days. Several OPs are ruined by pages of bickering over "he said that" and "you said that"
I enjoy this board generally but in my opinion the above comment is ruining it for the majority of posters.
You have your individual style, like we all do, but just suggesting you tone it down a bit.
Have a good weekend and let's hope for 3 points today. PUSB.

 

[letsallsingtogether]

Nick
Would it possible for you to go the whole weekend without analysing other posters words or comments and allow them to post freely without fear of being analysed to death.
Just a suggestion, like !!

TBH.
What really pisses me off is that yet another poster is a accused of being a liar.

 

[Nick]

I am not just referring to this post but several over the last few days. Several OPs are ruined by pages of bickering over "he said that" and "you said that"
I enjoy this board generally but in my opinion the above comment is ruining it for the majority of posters.
You have your individual style, like we all do, but just suggesting you tone it down a bit.
Have a good weekend and let's hope for 3 points today. PUSB.

I just go by what people say and use their own words. I hadn't seen this thread until late on.

Can understand it's annoying though to read.

 

[Nick]

TBH.
What really pisses me off is that yet another poster is a accused of being a liar.

Who accused of that?

 

[Skyblueweeman]

He’s right though Nick. Not that there’s sides but I’ve not disagreed with any of what you’ve said but this weekend mate, see if you can go without biting!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk