Could we have"ordinary refs" doing our games then.What do you mean? I still believe that ordinary refs have eyes and brains.
I don’t know, I think the game somehow managed to struggle on without VAR.That hasn't been enough down the years though has it. Unless you are happy to accept hand of God moments etc. Which is a fair enough viewpoint. I think the replays give the officials all the tools to get more decisions correct. The implementation is so bad however that I now don't think it's worth the hassle.
Nobody is saying otherwise, you don't have to be a sarcastic prick in every interaction you have on here.I don’t know, I think the game somehow managed to struggle on without VAR.
So I think we are to blame for it if I’m honest.Is there anyone who still thinks VAR makes the game better? Just one person? No judgment if that’s genuinely what you believe, I just don’t know if it even has any fans left.
Second paragraph recently highlighted in the English Womens world cup Rugby final NZ.It should be implemented how it is in rugby. The referee makes a call on field and refers it up to VAR to check his marking.
If a VAR official is proactively recommending a referee looks at the monitor, there’s an ingrained bias in the decision making.
Would that incident have been referred and given if it was a close game? I really don’t think so.
Is there anyone who still thinks VAR makes the game better? Just one person? No judgment if that’s genuinely what you believe, I just don’t know if it even has any fans left.
Why did no one complain about the Russian WC?
In theory but in practice the tech isn't that accurate as there's absolutely no allowance for that. If you do that maths with the speed the ball travels and the camera frame rate the margin of error is surprising large.A tight offside is offside in terms of evidence, there’s no room for emotion if it’s tight but offside it’s offside.
Next game up - Netherlands v Senegal. Stadium capacity is 40,000 and isn’t even half full according to the commenters.
Best WC ever though according to Infantino…..
Next game up - Netherlands v Senegal. Stadium capacity is 40,000 and isn’t even half full according to the commenters.
Best WC ever though according to Infantino…..
Excellent it’s why I’d stick with attackers benefit and allow technology to judge only those decisions that are definitively right or wrong. Ins and outs and blatant mistakes but how does one define blatant mistakesIn theory but in practice the tech isn't that accurate as there's absolutely no allowance for that. If you do that maths with the speed the ball travels and the camera frame rate the margin of error is surprising large.
Then there's also the issue of the camera angle, unless the camera is dead in line you have issues with the parallax viewing angle.
Essentially you need something similar to umpires call in cricket. for the ones that are too tight go with the decision on the pitch.
My memory is shit , can't even remember saying thisIn theory? Sure. In practice? Not in a million year.
This Holland game is empty.
I do like how the attendance is higher than the capacity. Good to see wasps account has got a new job
Not really. Laid a nice bit of concrete on a sunny afternoon. Might watch the highlights later on.Interested now?
Come on England
I don't have any problem with VAR. The system is fine. It's the people who manage it and operate it. That's the nonsense. It could work just fine, but is so frustrating because of the people in the booth and the way they interpretate it.Is there anyone who still thinks VAR makes the game better? Just one person? No judgment if that’s genuinely what you believe, I just don’t know if it even has any fans left.
I still believe in the tech. The implementation is consistently bad and ruined the concept really.
Exactly. It could be and should be a boon to the game. Nothing wrong with VAR itself, but if refs are going by micro whiskers, it makes the whole thing a joke.The problem is the implementation. The idea was to stop the massive errors, that's not what's its being used for.
Nobody wanted replays for if someones toe was a mm offside or the slightest bit of contact in the box.
You were doing so well and I was 100% with you, then you threw in 'interpretate'.I don't have any problem with VAR. The system is fine. It's the people who manage it and operate it. That's the nonsense. It could work just fine, but is so frustrating because of the people in the booth and the way they interpretate it.
I think that’s unfair. The remit is too large and unmanageable and ultimately undeliverableI don't have any problem with VAR. The system is fine. It's the people who manage it and operate it. That's the nonsense. It could work just fine, but is so frustrating because of the people in the booth and the way they interpretate it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?