Gynnsthetonic
Well-Known Member
No thanks
No thanksGary O'Neil apparently on the brink should Wolves lose at home to Saints this weekend... maybe a bit too ambitious?
Again stop being silly.I know I’m a stuck record here but can you guys hear yourselves?
“Oh we need a giant modern setup so that sacking the manager won’t have any impact”
Why did you sack the manager?
“Oh I’m hoping it’ll impact the results”
Fuck knows then - I feel like no one is going to be pleased regardless of who we get (perhaps understandably) but it does not bode well for the rest of the season and beyondNo thanks
Guilty as charged but to be fair, I didn’t try to claim it!Should have copyrighted this shout.
Well said.None of the usual names that litter the betting lists.
Nor the football dinosaur has beens either.
Or the wanky ex players.
We need to go creative and bring in a proven European coach that is tactically astute, with proven success and innovative practice.
We then need some fucking patience and give the new guy a chance.
It took Thomas Frank 4 seasons to get Brentford up and he’s kept them up.
I really do hope King is looking at this type of coach and that the fans back him all the way.
We’ve got a great squad and will strengthen in Jan-season isn’t over yet.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Big sam or warnock
Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk
Well said.
lots of clubs have removed / lost good managers and gone on to do better ….
Bournemouth sacked Howe and look at them now
Brighton lost Potter and look at them now
Forest sacked Cooper look at them now
The next appointment is key and who ever it is they will deserve our support, just as we forgave Mark when he returned for a second time.
Survival battle ahead no better two in the businessIf you’re not joking, I suggest you call 111 now and ask to speak to a doctor.
Survival battle ahead no better two in the business
Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk
Need an experienced head now to steady the ship for this season things could get very toxic very fast tough run of games we need to try survive now this season as it has gone tits up no time to be experimenting with rookiesWe don’t know that yet. It’s still very early in the season. Both suggestions very silly. If you’ve hit your head have a lie down and put a cold compress on it.
Again stop being silly.
It means less hassle when you do need to change a manager. Focus on one issue not having to completely change everything about the club with ever new manager you hire who has different ways of working
And MilneEven in our own history. Hill is the most comparable manager to Robins.
After he left we carried on progressing with Noel Cantwell
I’m generally optimistic that there’s a plan. But I’m not enamoured with the Bloomfield link
Comes down to the DOF or owner usually I believeOK. I’m going to come over your side and stop sniping at the idea management structures matter for a second.
Who decides if everyone else is working and who is to blame if something isn’t?
What specifically made Robins responsible for our recent slide? And not the coaches or performance staff or scouts? What’s the process for replacing those people?
If you’re always hiring for the group and never putting responsibility on one person then you trend towards the mean. Fine if the mean is high performing, but if not then you’re selecting for mediocrity because the new manager may come in and want better but will lose out as it’s easier to sack him than seventeen others.
I would say that a lot of the problems we had are tactical. We don’t seem to know our best 11 - we’ve changed formations multiple times and he’s at the stage where he’s just throwing things at it to see what sticks - see Rudoni at left back.OK. I’m going to come over your side and stop sniping at the idea management structures matter for a second.
Who decides if everyone else is working and who is to blame if something isn’t?
What specifically made Robins responsible for our recent slide? And not the coaches or performance staff or scouts? What’s the process for replacing those people?
If you’re always hiring for the group and never putting responsibility on one person then you trend towards the mean. Fine if the mean is high performing, but if not then you’re selecting for mediocrity because the new manager may come in and want better but will lose out as it’s easier to sack him than seventeen others.
Comes down to the DOF or owner usually I believe
And we won't have a dof....but we have a doug
I’m not against him per se. I actually spoke to my cousin last night and noticed he was doing a good job what with them being top.Happy with the notion there’s an idea of the type of “head coach” we want. Not sure I have faith in it being the right choice first time.
Well yes that’s because he’s the ownerRight so Doug is effectively a manager who can’t be sacked.
This country so desperately needs 50+1.Right so Doug is effectively a manager who can’t be sacked.
I would say that a lot of the problems we had are tactical. We don’t seem to know our best 11 - we’ve changed formations multiple times and he’s at the stage where he’s just throwing things at it to see what sticks - see Rudoni at left back.
there also seems to be what seems inconsistency in motivation. We seem up for it one game and cba the next.
The subs seem odd, and we seem very slow to notice when a game is turning,
these rightly or wrongly fall onto the manager.
Well yes that’s because he’s the owner
Comes down to the DOF or owner usually I believe
And we won't have a dof....but we have a doug
Becuase on the pitch decisions are on the manager. Always have done.Why not the coaches? Why not the person responsible for player performance? If these things ultimately fall onto the manager then how is this system different from the normal manager at the top making decisions?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?