Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Royal Family (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Malaka
  • Start date Apr 21, 2016
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #71
chiefdave said:
This isn't a flippant question but would you rather not have a royal family but pay more tax to offset the £1.2bn a year loss of income?
Click to expand...

I'd much rather end the culture of the privileged few and elite and get them to pay tax properly, that'd soon sort it.

It's crass and insulting to have such an open display of wealth when there is crippling poverty in areas of this country. Oh, and we are also supposed to respect and admire them?

Next in like to the throne is someone who classed Jimmy Savile as a close friend, like the BBC, I wonder how much was ignored and or covered up?
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #72
Sick Boy said:
Hand the Royal buildings over to the people and turn them into museums for tourists to waste their cash in.
Click to expand...

Hand them back to the people as I am sure most were ours in the first place.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #73
Sick Boy said:
I'd much rather end the culture of the privileged few and elite and get them to pay tax properly, that'd soon sort it.

It's crass and insulting to have such an open display of wealth when there is crippling poverty in areas of this country. Oh, and we are also supposed to respect and admire them?

Next in like to the throne is someone who classed Jimmy Savile as a close friend, like the BBC, I wonder how much was ignored and or covered up?
Click to expand...

i have no time for them, out of interest would you bow if you met one of them? I know I wouldn't

that at liitle boy was probably wearing a pair of pyjamas that cost as much as some people have to live on for a week or maybe more.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #74
Absolutely not, no!
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #75
Sick Boy said:
I'd much rather end the culture of the privileged few and elite and get them to pay tax properly, that'd soon sort it.

It's crass and insulting to have such an open display of wealth when there is crippling poverty in areas of this country. Oh, and we are also supposed to respect and admire them?

Next in like to the throne is someone who classed Jimmy Savile as a close friend, like the BBC, I wonder how much was ignored and or covered up?
Click to expand...

Yup, they are symbolic of a culture of privilege and poverty that should be a thing of the past.
 

ccfctommy

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #76
Sick Boy said:
Hand the Royal buildings over to the people and turn them into museums for tourists to waste their cash in.
Click to expand...
This.

I have no time for the royal family. Totally outdated concept. We as a country need to have a debate about them once the Queen passes away.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #77
Samo said:
Yup, they are symbolic of a culture of privilege and poverty that should be a thing of the past.
Click to expand...

And replace them with Cameron and co?

Terry Gibson's perm said:
Hand them back to the people as I am sure most were ours in the first place.
Click to expand...

Would that happen or would everything end up in private ownership.

I'm not really for or against the royals but I'm not sure I see getting rid of them having a huge positive impact for the country.
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #78
chiefdave said:
And replace them with Cameron and co?



Would that happen or would everything end up in private ownership.

I'm not really for or against the royals but I'm not sure I see getting rid of them having a huge positive impact for the country.
Click to expand...

Cameron and Co are already here Dave. (not my choice) No need to replace them with anything.
 
S

Steve.B50

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #79
Terry Gibson's perm said:
i have no time for them, out of interest would you bow if you met one of them? I know I wouldn't

that at liitle boy was probably wearing a pair of pyjamas that cost as much as some people have to live on for a week or maybe more.
Click to expand...

Yes! I would bow. My choice.
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #80
I_Saw_Shaw_Score said:
William & Harry have moved them on centuries!
2 superb lads IMO.
Click to expand...

To the 17th Century?
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #81
Haha top lads based on what? Promoting trophy hunting? It's funny how so many get taken in by theits and the media's PR so easily.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #82
Samo said:
Cameron and Co are already here Dave. (not my choice) No need to replace them with anything.
Click to expand...

But he'd be President Cameron then, that would be even worse. Would also mean all trade deals etc would be down to him, the royals are pretty useful to roll out for that kind of thing.

Wonder if there will ever be a referendum on it? Think if it came to it becoming a republic would be a pretty hard sell.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #83
chiefdave said:
But he'd be President Cameron then, that would be even worse. Would also mean all trade deals etc would be down to him, the royals are pretty useful to roll out for that kind of thing.

Wonder if there will ever be a referendum on it? Think if it came to it becoming a republic would be a pretty hard sell.
Click to expand...

How are they in anyway useful to trade deals? I'm sure us plebs could manage just fine without them.

Sadly there will never be a republic in the UK due to the hat doffing mentality that so many have and how easily their PR bullshit gets swallowed.
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #84
chiefdave said:
But he'd be President Cameron then, that would be even worse. Would also mean all trade deals etc would be down to him, the royals are pretty useful to roll out for that kind of thing.

Wonder if there will ever be a referendum on it? Think if it came to it becoming a republic would be a pretty hard sell.
Click to expand...

I thought the royals always stay out of politics?
I agree it would be a hard sell, people don't like change... better the devil you know and all that bollocks!
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #85
It'd also make far more sense to have a president who was actually elected rather than someone doing it due to a birth-right?
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #86
I love all the pomp and circumstance it creates.
The immediate family I am happy with with but the fringes are a luxury.

The queen is a wonderful advertisement for Britain.
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 24, 2016
  • #87
italiahorse said:
I love all the pomp and circumstance it creates.
The immediate family I am happy with with but the fringes are a luxury.

The queen is a wonderful advertisement for Britain.
Click to expand...

Yes, if you want to advertise that nowhere else in the world is more deliberately and overtly unjust in terms of the distribution of wealth and privilege.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?