skybluedan
Well-Known Member
Tim you really are a pathetic little wanker ,if I did not hate you so much I would probably pity
never trust anyone wearing wax jackets........
never trust anyone wearing wax jackets........
The removal of Tim Fisher is absolutely central to the future of Coventry City Football Club !
Only angry they don't ask the right sensible questions we all want asking instead we get video links of Poole and turner talking about how great they are and how great SP cock tastes.
Still not as much as the Telegraph.
FFS Torch, how old are you? I'm coming to the conclusion that you and RFC are the same poster,because you both talk shit.
Fuck me. If there's a talking shit club then you, BHSB and quite a few others would be in it with me.
Fisher is safe. His boss is the person getting him to BS to us. If she got rid of him she would have to replace him with someone else who would have the nerve to BS us and keep a straight face. Not easy to find.
Fisher is safe. His boss is the person getting him to BS to us. If she got rid of him she would have to replace him with someone else who would have the nerve to BS us and keep a straight face. Not easy to find.
Who's turning on another party. People are saying they want some more pressing questions asked of Fisher. What's wrong with that?Here you go Tim. Another "get out of jail free" card for you. No wonder you feel you can say what you like regardless of how far it is from reality when fans automatically turn it on another party instead of holding you to account. Its like you're Teflon coated, you should consider politics if this football lark doesn't work out for you.
Who's turning on another party. People are saying they want some more pressing questions asked of Fisher. What's wrong with that?
I would have thought all the local press would be straight onto this. It can't be that hard to go to Fisher this is what Rugby Council have said and this is what you have said, why are they so different.
This is what I don't understand with Fisher. Surely after the last round of FOI requests then he would think that as soon as he opens his mouth about Ruby then the same would be done. This either shows that he is simply a fucking moron or just couldn't give a shit about us and say's things for the sake of it. Come to think of it, he's both.
Who's turning on another party. People are saying they want some more pressing questions asked of Fisher. What's wrong with that?
Doesn't swearing on the forums account for anything now it's you who seems to be the one doing it? Does your lad still read posts on here Torchy? Big difference between you and me Torchy...I don't report your swearingFuck me. If there's a talking shit club then you, BHSB and quite a few others would be in it with me.
Totally agree, so why don't the Telegraph press him? Or CWR? If fans can see it why can't professional journalists?
Doesn't swearing on the forums account for anything now it's you who seems to be the one doing it? Does your lad still read posts on here Torchy? Big difference between you and me Torchy...I don't report your swearing
Here's a link to the minutes: http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/ccfc-stadium-forum-coventry-city-2226866.aspx
For those unable to access this, here are the relevant TF sections (I've highlighted the discrepencies with the FOI request):
________________________________________________________________________________
TF arrived - Edit - Did anyone slap him?
· The new ground would be outside the Coventry boundary - Edit - Not fucking good enough! Did anyone object? as there is nowhere suitable
within the Coventry boundary. The Football League laid down certain criteria and other
comments affecting the infrastructure. In particular, the radius (in miles) has been set at
a distance from Earl Street, Coventry. The club have actively engaged with Architects,
Consultants, Property, Highways Consultants and commissioned an Economic Impact
Assessment. An extensive site search has been conducted during the last 18 months.
One of the biggest challenges is that Coventry is bound by green belt land.
· TF confirmed that to date there have been numerous sites considered during the land
search process but he wanted to share information on 3 principal sites which had been
considered in detail:
1. Brandon Speedway. This site is 26 acres and is 4.6 miles from Earl Street. The club had
met with Rugby Council. The Council had been clear that they felt that the site was not
suitable for a football stadium. The highways challenges were too great. However, Rugby
Council were extremely interested in an Academy/training ground facility and
acknowledged the benefits for the local community. As such, the site could have been
appealing for potential use of the Academy/Training Ground. Despite further work
including an environmental investigation the club did not pursue. The issues around
securing vacant possession were simply too big – there was an ongoing legal issue with
the land owners and HMRC.
2. Ansty. The club also enquired with Rugby Council about this 100+ acre site which is 4
miles from Earl Street. Despite the potential suitability of the site itself, it was not
possible to get a highways solution due to access issues with an adjoining site.
3. Ryton – 23 acres (net) – again a meeting with Rugby Council. Despite some highway
issues there was a relatively straightforward solution with a spur off the A46. The
subsequent sale process saw Prologis successfully close the land deal with a bid of
£650,000 per acre.
· TF wants to announce the land deal as soon as possible (expected to be the year 3072) but is bound by confidentiality
and subject to NDAs, as is SG.
Date of Next Meeting: There will be no scheduled meeting until the announcement of the
land acquisition in 3072
______________________________________________________________________________________
I ask the simple question: 'Just what would Rugby Council gain by not revealing these meetings?'
Someone's telling porkies here - if it is indeed our Chairman/Chief Executive/Managing Director (or whatever his most recent appointment is) then it begs the question: 'Fit and Proper Owners':thinking about:???
Perhaps it's others who are lying?
· The new ground would be outside the Coventry boundary as there is nowhere suitable
within the Coventry boundary. The Football League laid down certain criteria and other
comments affecting the infrastructure. In particular, the radius (in miles) has been set at
a distance from Earl Street, Coventry. The club have actively engaged with Architects,
Consultants, Property, Highways Consultants and commissioned an Economic Impact
Assessment. An extensive site search has been conducted during the last 18 months.
One of the biggest challenges is that Coventry is bound by green belt land.
i had to laugh when i saw fisher said hockaday wont be new manager,i went and put £100 on straight away
Odd thread this.
I thought everything fisher says has to be believed - no?
Not really. Fisher say's one thing and Rugby council say's something to contradict him. We as CCFC fans want answers, obviously you're happy with Fisher judging by your post not asking that he has questions to answer. Tut tut, I thought you said the other week that you were CCFC's no 1 non attending fan, that tag must now be slipping.
Or perhaps you stop living in cloud cuckoo land and relies the hard facts -
The stadium is a fabrication and is not part of their business model, it never has been and never will be. FACT
Another Fact for you - Your a twat. Lots of hugs.
Totally agree, so why don't the Telegraph press him? Or CWR? If fans can see it why can't professional journalists?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?