Harry Krishner
Well-Known Member
Not how it works. It you want to claim a certain person or type of person committed a crime, then the burden of proof lies with you.
You say this person said such and such, it's up to you to provide the proof they did. "Can't be arsed" to "waste time digging around" is not valid. Either prove they said it or retract the assertion that they did. I see afterwards you were talking about the 'jist' of something he said. Again not good enough - that's you putting you own interpretation on what was actually said.
I beg to differ.
This is the off-topic forum of a football supporters' website - not University Challenge or defence of a PhD thesis. People pull some fairly questionable and very poorly informed (see israel/Palestine) assertions out of their arses and hold others to standards known only to themselves.
I posted a couple of fairly decent links earlier on - see these and draw your own conclusions, but I'm sure I summarised Trevor Phillips' findings in a fair and reasonable manner.
Appreciate the diversity of views on here anyway - it's quite unusual to see these days.