Not how it works. It you want to claim a certain person or type of person committed a crime, then the burden of proof lies with you.
You say this person said such and such, it's up to you to provide the proof they did. "Can't be arsed" to "waste time digging around" is not valid. Either prove they said it or retract the assertion that they did. I see afterwards you were talking about the 'jist' of something he said. Again not good enough - that's you putting you own interpretation on what was actually said.
I beg to differ.
This is the off-topic forum of a football supporters' website - not University Challenge or defence of a PhD thesis. People pull some fairly questionable and very poorly informed (see israel/Palestine) assertions out of their arses and hold others to standards known only to themselves.
I posted a couple of fairly decent links earlier on - see these and draw your own conclusions, but I'm sure I summarised Trevor Phillips' findings in a fair and reasonable manner.
Appreciate the diversity of views on here anyway - it's quite unusual to see these days.
Appreciate the diversity of views on here anyway - it's quite unusual to see these days.
Blimey. Comment was simply about death penalty compared to life in prison.
OK. If we are playing that game... I support more carrying of knives and love stop and search.
In reality S&S has proved historically to be a great tool for prejudiced police officers, so instead I'd listen to the experts and advocate strong sentences, education, and maybe only searches where evidence of kids being in gangs or where under strong suspicions of committing a crime.
Stats say otherwiseLook at it from the other view and it has stopped a lot of knife crime and stabbings especially in London. Why would you need to bring any prejudice into it? It clearly works or did work.
Stats say otherwise
If it's done properly and proper sentences handed out to people carrying knives, it will cut it down.
Does stop and search work? - Full Fact
Discussion of stop and search focuses on its use as a crime deterrent. But this ignores its use as an investigatory power.fullfact.org
I know we’re in the era of post truth world
The prisons are full. Who are you letting out to create room for this 40K?40,000 knives in the past few years have been found during stop and search.
Give them all a mandatory 5 years sentence and watch the rates fall. Give them a slap on the wrist and it won't do much.
text book examples of both inciting hatred and inciting people to riotNot sure any of those are worthy of prison sentences
Same people coming out to make room for those getting sent down for posting stuff online.The prisons are full. Who are you letting out to create room for this 40K?
The prisons are full. Who are you letting out to create room for this 40K?
You said different nationality immigrants were predisposed to committing different crimes. It can’t be a surprise to get called out on the claim.I beg to differ.
This is the off-topic forum of a football supporters' website - not University Challenge or defence of a PhD thesis. People pull some fairly questionable and very poorly informed (see israel/Palestine) assertions out of their arses and hold others to standards known only to themselves.
I posted a couple of fairly decent links earlier on - see these and draw your own conclusions, but I'm sure I summarised Trevor Phillips' findings in a fair and reasonable manner.
Appreciate the diversity of views on here anyway - it's quite unusual to see these days.
Really?text book examples of both inciting hatred and inciting people to riot
It gets knives off the streets. Maybe doesn't stop them re offending but any knife taken from a young lad is removing the risk even temporarily.Stats say otherwise
But that's probably in single digits. The record high number of people in prison in the UK at any one time is 88K, not sure there's any practical way you could pretty much overnight decide to add to the prison population by 50%.Same people coming out to make room for those getting sent down for posting stuff online.
Stop and search when done in the US disproportionately targets black people. If you can find a way of not just racially profiling people here then go for it, but based on the huge issues with the Met currently I’m not convinced we’d avoid that problem.It gets knives off the streets. Maybe doesn't stop them re offending but any knife taken from a young lad is removing the risk even temporarily.
Think it depends on the location and crime statistics.Stop and search when done in the US disproportionately targets black people. If you can find a way of not just racially profiling people here then go for it, but based on the huge issues with the Met currently I’m not convinced we’d avoid that problem.
This is where the subconscious biases we were discussing become very relevant. If police officers come to associate knife crime with different races, they will end up focusing their searches more on members of those communities.Think it depends on the location and crime statistics.
If it's in London it's obviously going to be different to rural Yorkshire.
Which is why nothing will change.This is where the subconscious biases we were discussing become very relevant. If police officers come to associate knife crime with different races, they will end up focusing their searches more on members of those communities.
probably a more shocking set of stats.
Now here is a surprise.
That's why I'm on about statistics too.This is where the subconscious biases we were discussing become very relevant. If police officers come to associate knife crime with different races, they will end up focusing their searches more on members of those communities.
If you can get universal stop and search coverage across these communities then go for it. I’m just saying that if the policy ends up just targeting black people you’ll have stoked another problem in the process.Which is why nothing will change.
I am not saying she is wrong, quite the contrary but nothing will change, well it will get worse.
The issue in the US is that the ‘Yorkshire’ scenario you describe happens often. The point is if you want to focus on a certain part of the country that’s fine, just ensure that the searching is done of everybody instead of certain demographics.That's why I'm on about statistics too.
For example if somewhere in Yorkshire the knife crime / murder is mainly carried out by white teens but they are just stopping black people then something is wrong.
In London, if the majority of knife crime / murders is carried out by black people then surely you would see that reflected in the certain areas?
The issue in the US is that the ‘Yorkshire’ scenario you describe happens often. The point is if you want to focus on a certain part of the country that’s fine, just ensure that the searching is done of everybody instead of certain demographics.
Maybe at the same time this is going on we could offer a blade amnesty.
And I’m talking about the problem if you have underlying racial biases in the police forces assigned to the job. I’m not convinced they aren’t still there.I'm talking about statistics of the different areas and that the percentages are bound to be different.
Really?text book examples of both inciting hatred and inciting people to riot
fair commentIt gets knives off the streets. Maybe doesn't stop them re offending but any knife taken from a young lad is removing the risk even temporarily.
If you can get universal stop and search coverage across these communities then go for it. I’m just saying that if the policy ends up just targeting black people you’ll have stoked another problem in the process.
I also have zero faith in the Met’s ability to do the job.
Does this mean you wouldn’t also search white people?In London its a majority black issue is it not?
Are a majority of youth knife offenders minority ethnic? - Full Fact
Across England and Wales in 2017, 38% of knife possession convictions among under 25s were convictions of non-white youths.fullfact.org
Does this mean you wouldn’t also search white people?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?