Skyblue_CP
Well-Known Member
Why are people so quick to drop Latibeudiere out the starting 11? I think he’s been superb in both the matches.
Why are people so quick to drop Latibeudiere out the starting 11? I think he’s been superb in both the matches.
I thought he had a decent game for the most part but did nearly gift them two goals toward the end of the game.Why are people so quick to drop Latibeudiere out the starting 11? I think he’s been superb in both the matches.
Yeah that’s fairI thought he had a decent game for the most part but did nearly gift them two goals toward the end of the game.
We have to remember he's playing on his weaker side. Playing out of position to accommodate other players.I thought he had a decent game for the most part but did nearly gift them two goals toward the end of the game.
We have to remember he's playing on his weaker side. Playing out of position to accommodate other players.
I would keep it as it is, not sure it'll do Simms confidence much good to drop him already. I also think he needs the match practice as looks rustiest of the three.
Robins is usually very loyal to a starting 11 that had won the previous game.Did Robins allude to Wright being short on match fitness hence the start at Wimbledon and bench v Boro?
I agree we should keep it unchanged, Wright as an impact sub for 30 minutes will help ease him into match fitness and form.
He had a stinker at Rotherham last week.One major concern about Saturday is that Bobby Madeley is the referee!!
ExactlyHe had a stinker at Rotherham last week.
I think with Kitching coming in he will make that LCB permanently his.I thought that once Binks was up to speed he would get more game time in that left side slot. With Latibeudiere filling in along the back and in CDM. I guess a lot would depend if another CB comes in permanently as well I guess.
Mcfadz was also at fault for one of those when they tackling each otherI thought he had a decent game for the most part but did nearly gift them two goals toward the end of the game.
Remember thinking Fadz should have just gone full steam into that, regardless if he booted Lati, the Ball or their player up in the air.Mcfadz was also at fault for one of those when they tackling each other
I think with Kitching coming in he will make that LCB permanently his.
Thomas I reckon.Who's is Fadz long term replacement then, Latibeaudiere? Or does Thomas move in to the middle?
One was actually down to McFadz getting in the way and cocking up a simple backpass to Wilson . McFadz apologized immediately afterwards.I thought he had a decent game for the most part but did nearly gift them two goals toward the end of the game.
apparently Kitching carries the ball forward quite a lot too, and does that overlapping role so could see him as the LCBI don't see Thomas as the central player in the 3 personally. Those mental forward runs he goes on would be curtailed and it's a good bit of a threat to use him to overload. Similar to what Sheffield Utd did that year under Wilder.
I think it could end up being Joel or Kitching if/when he comes in. Binks or Kitching on the left. Thomas on right, Joel/Kitching centre. If Joel is comfortable enough on the ball to also play CDM then he should be able to play out from the back in that central role too.
Fadz is still the first name on the team sheet at the moment anyway
I would say LatibeaudaireWho's is Fadz long term replacement then, Latibeaudiere? Or does Thomas move in to the middle?
I would say Latibeaudaire
Compared to last season of of a 36yo, 3 loans and RoseIf we did agree a deal for Kitching that would be back line at 22/23 y/o on long term deals. That's some good future planning by the club.
They would be the 2Fadz is still the first name on the team sheet at the moment anyway
George Curtis would have done all threeRemember thinking Fadz should have just gone full steam into that, regardless if he booted Lati, the Ball or their player up in the air.
Wilson for me.I see that
And I raise you Ben Sheaf
Hope there's not 20 minutes added on each halfView attachment 31492View attachment 31493View attachment 31494
Long old trek on Saturday!! Fingers crossed for 3 points
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?