Well it hasn’t and I can assure you that having spoken to leading people in German motor manufacturers they seem far far more concerned than major UK motor manufacturers. That is a 100% fact and you like me as a person who puts the UK first I’m sure finds some reassurance from that.
Well it hasn’t and I can assure you that having spoken to leading people in German motor manufacturers they seem far far more concerned than major UK motor manufacturers. That is a 100% fact and you like me as a person who puts the UK first I’m sure finds some reassurance from that.
Just apart from the slight issue of not being able to discuss trade immediately. I don't why the mighty UK didn't get its way with that one. What happened? I thought the UK was calling the shots?
Good to see that the government has made yet another concession in giving MPs a full vote on Brexit as well.
I'm more interested in what's best for both sides not just one.
I’m purely interested in what’s best for the uk I couldn’t give a fuck about the rest of Europe.
23 European countries just signed a European Defence Union. Europe just made a step towards independence. NATO stays, but Europe moves towards looking after it’s own interests. It seems the rest of Europe doesn’t give a fuck about you. Brexit and Trump has brought Europe together. So there are benefits.
I’m purely interested in what’s best for the uk I couldn’t give a fuck about the rest of Europe.
Awesome - I’m sure the collective might of an EU army will have Russia China et al quacking in their boots. The only thing the Eu are bringing together is the rise of the far right.
They are more interested in stability in Africa than arguing with China, and with security of the EU borders. I don’t see why Russia and China would be worried about a Defence Union. It is what it says.
Big mouthing, invading countries with brown skinned people and name calling of other crazy leaders is more for Trump.
Brexit and Trump has brought Europe together. So there are benefits.
Deluded. Europe is more divided now than at any time in the last 50 years.
Just for Grendel and Astute:
UK is 'number one country for criminals hiding money'
House of Commons
Parliament
Dame Margaret Hodge says that "unbelievably huge sums of money" are hidden in these jurisdictions.
She says: "We cannot claim we are leading the fight against tax avoidance when we are enabling tax avoidance to prosper, and not just that, but also corruption [and] money laundering."
"We're now being seen as the number one country for criminals to hide their money through tax avoidance and evasion."
Corruption? She doesn't have a clue.Just for Grendel and Astute:
UK is 'number one country for criminals hiding money'
House of Commons
Parliament
Dame Margaret Hodge says that "unbelievably huge sums of money" are hidden in these jurisdictions.
She says: "We cannot claim we are leading the fight against tax avoidance when we are enabling tax avoidance to prosper, and not just that, but also corruption [and] money laundering."
"We're now being seen as the number one country for criminals to hide their money through tax avoidance and evasion."
Corruption? She doesn't have a clue.
The EU commission knows what is.going on
Corruption across EU 'breathtaking'
The UK wanted to guarantee citizens rights from day one, so already has the moral high ground on this point but on the basis that your EU friends want to use them as bargaining chips then we are absolutely correct to do the same.
Margaret Hodge has repeatedly accused the government of encouraging corruption and dodgy deals while st the same time having a family business which paid less than 0.1% corporation tax. She also in an election manifesto said expense scandal MPs should be bought to book but that her £700,000 in one year was perfectly reasonable.
Sort of proves my point that we have a bad name about tax dodging. Juncker has not yet been caught dipping the till for 700000 as far as I know and I thought Amazon paid 2% in Luxemburg. He could learn a lot from our MPd.
How about coming out with evidence on what rights would be taken away instead of looking for someone like Margaret Hodge to back up what you say.Why did the EU have to tell Davis again today that the EU wants citizens to retain their rights?
„The Parliament’s Brexit coordinator Guy Verhofstadt wrote to the UK’s Brexit Secretary on Tuesday to warn that EU citizens in Britain should have “exactly the same rights as they have today” after the UK leaves.“
It is the UK who want to take away citizens rights.
How about coming out with evidence on what rights would be taken away instead of looking for someone like Margaret Hodge to back up what you say.
How about coming out with evidence on what rights would be taken away instead of looking for someone like Margaret Hodge to back up what you say.
No my point is her views on tax evasion are about as valid as the McCanns on childcare (cue faux pas outrage)
So an EU citizen should be able to leave the UK for a long time and then come back whenever they feel like it?This:
INTERNATIONAL
All the rights EU citizens in the UK are set to lose after Brexit
- 27.06.2017, 10:13
- 1,158
EU citizens protest against BrexitThomas Lohnes / Getty
WERBUNG
inRead invented by Teads
- Right for EU citizens to leave the UK for long periods will be restricted post-Brexit.
- Two classes of EU citizens will be created in the UK.
- Right to bring over family members will be restricted.
- EU citizens will lose protection of the European Court of Justice.
So,everything in the UK and it’s dependencies is ok because she said it isn’t, but the EU is corrupt and helps tax dodging. Like your logic.
Margaret Hodge has repeatedly accused the government of encouraging corruption and dodgy deals while st the same time having a family business which paid less than 0.1% corporation tax. She also in an election manifesto said expense scandal MPs should be bought to book but that her £700,000 in one year was perfectly reasonable.
Don't you get how ironic it was coming from her? It is people like herself doing it.Doesn’t actually address her point though does it?
I know you’re king of shit arguments and logical fallacies, but cmon, at least try for a cogent argument.
If you tell me the sky is blue, you’re not wrong just because you’re a despicable c**t are you?
Doesn’t actually address her point though does it?
I know you’re king of shit arguments and logical fallacies, but cmon, at least try for a cogent argument.
If you tell me the sky is blue, you’re not wrong just because you’re a despicable c**t are you?
What next - you are going to present a statement food has risen by 20% or show some random graphs without comprehending their meaning.
If I’m the King then you truly are the God of the entire universe and beyond.
She doesn’t have a point.
She made a statement with zero evidence. I’d imagine she’s someone you can relate to very well.
So an EU citizen should be able to leave the UK for a long time and then come back whenever they feel like it?
Two classes? Oh yeah. Is that like a UK citizen and those that don't want it?
Distant family members?
If they stay in the UK they should be under the UK law. If they want to be under another like the EU they need to live there.
What a load of bollocks.They came under EU law and don’t want their rights taken from them. The EU is protecting those rights. I hope the UK will be protecting my rights in the EU. I doubt it though with the present tosser government.
What a load of bollocks.
If we.leave the EU we shouldn't still be ruled by the EU. If you want to be ruled bu the EU then live in it like you still will.
Or do you think that those who have left the UK to live in the EU should be ruled bu the UK still once we leave?
What about the concession that you just ignored?
The right to bring a non EU spouse to the UK as an example.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?