I don't actually think he has many followers, the smarter candidates for succession to the Tory party leadership will be using him as a battering ram to knock over May when the time is right, I reckon their next leader will be either Rees-Mogg or Javid.
How am I supposed to have a debate with bitter and twisted people?
No way will it be Rees-Mogg, his religious views are pretty extreme for a lot of ordinary people in this country.
However, like a lot of other religious nutjobs, he is a fucking hypocrite
Anti-abortion MP Jacob Rees-Mogg admits profiting from sale of abortion pills
In his warped mind he believes it wrong for a rape victim to seek an abortion, yet his happy to profit from it.
Javid is much, much more likely.
He was cornered on question time on Thursday by one of the other panielists as to why he’s felt it necessary to open an office in Dublin for his investment firm. He started going on about it being an international business having offices in New York, Sydney etc. All offices in different time zones and 8+ hours away by plane which is understandable. Dublin is less than an hour and a half away from London and in the same time zone, there can be only one need to open an office there. To retain access to the EU. Fine if he believes that it’s a price worth paying and the cost of doing this to his business is going to be offset with the comfort of it being in the best interests of the U.K. but he never said that, he hid behind a cloud of we’re an international business instead.
Lol it confirms in the interpretation of the data that the result is likely to be unchanged
If the pound falls against the Euro he can transfer some Euros back and cash in on the exchange rate.
SB, are these people not part of the two major parties as I mentioned? at no point did I imply that the mob you mentioned are sticking up for the people 'left behind' quite the opposite. If you read my post again, I am quite clearly saying that the protest vote happened because the political elite, in it's entirety, has left people behind, I don't just mean the posh twat's when I say political elite, I include every serving MP.Personally I'd say the likes of Rees Mogg, Gove, Johnson, Patel etc are very much part of the political class. To think that these sort of politicians are sticking up the people left behind is insane.
SB, are these people not part of the two major parties as I mentioned? at no point did I imply that the mob you mentioned are sticking up for the people 'left behind' quite the opposite. If you read my post again, I am quite clearly saying that the protest vote happened because the political elite, in it's entirety, has left people behind, I don't just mean the posh twat's when I say political elite, I include every serving MP.
I can't form an argument in reply, as most of the points you are attempting to attack me with, apart from me not agreeing that JC is the answer, I have never suggested or implied. Now, you can try and put words in my mouth, however Mart, Iv'e always considered you more intellectually capable than stooping to that.And who is behind the Rees Mogg plans for deregulation and an open doors trade policy?
US groups raise millions to support rightwing UK thinktanks
That plus Banks‘ millions for the leave campaign... maybe the Russian millions supposedly for some mining deal which never arrived at the mining company.
Do you think that the millions being donated are for the benefit of the ‚left behind‘? I think the ‚left behind‘ were influenced into backing the wrong horse for other people’s benefit. Frankly, Jeremy Corbyn is the only chance for them. ... and dropping article 50. The EU protects their rights as opposed to the Rees Mogg and BoJo ideas.
I can't form an argument in reply, as most of the points you are attempting to attack me with, apart from me not agreeing that JC is the answer, I have never suggested or implied. Now, you can try and put words in my mouth, however Mart, Iv'e always considered you more intellectually capable than stooping to that.
Fuck me. Just seen Robert Pestons interview with Boris where Boris tried to explain why just in time supply chains won't be affected by leaving the single market.
We're being lead over a cliff by morons with posh voices.
Which part of it is bullshit then?
Can't have been any worse than the car crash May has had on Marr this morning.
At least we've got the Festival of Brexit to look forward to
Theresa May proposes £120m Brexit festival to take place in 2022
Festival of Brexit! Heard it all now. Might end up being a wake.
Can't have been any worse than the car crash May has had on Marr this morning.
At least we've got the Festival of Brexit to look forward to
Theresa May proposes £120m Brexit festival to take place in 2022
JIT worked before the EU, it works in non-EU countries. The scheduling has to be changed, may or may not result in additional costs. Hardly a cliff-edge...but hey, I love a good dramaFuck me. Just seen Robert Pestons interview with Boris where Boris tried to explain why just in time supply chains won't be affected by leaving the single market.
We're being lead over a cliff by morons with posh voices.
Pretty big in Pharma, agriculturals, machines...to name a few. Mock them at leisureUsed an example of why it will work using the aero industry where one of the two movements of goods happened within the single market so goods arrived JIT in Derby from Berlin and then used Switzerland which is all but in name in the single market (not sure what Switzerland makes apart from cuckoo clocks, sewing machines and chocolate). The bloke doesn’t have one single answer.
JIT worked before the EU, it works in non-EU countries. The scheduling has to be changed, may or may not result in additional costs. Hardly a cliff-edge...but hey, I love a good drama
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
JIT worked before the EU, it works in non-EU countries. The scheduling has to be changed, may or may not result in additional costs. Hardly a cliff-edge...but hey, I love a good drama
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Pretty big in Pharma, agriculturals, machines...to name a few. Mock them at leisure
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
That's why the scheduling would need to be revisited. It isn't rocket science. They just simply undertake the same process in scheduling as they did in the first place...and no doubt revisit regularly...& make adjustments. Brexit is only one of a vast number of variables involved. That's the idea of JIT!Will almost certainly result in additional costs. Free movement of goods are critical with JIT manufacturing. The alternative is stockpiling which means investment in material, investment in infrastructure to hold those materials and investment in capital because materials have to be bank rolled while they’re sitting on a shelf waiting to be used.? It’s not just final assembly that is put at risk it’s all the manufacturers in the supply chain that carry the risk. If you’re a U.K. supplier of widgets to a manufacturer in the EU and all of a sudden you have a customs barrier in the chain it’s an unknown to deal with and you have to prepare for every eventuality and possibility.
That's why the scheduling would need to be revisited. It isn't rocket science. They just simply undertake the same process in scheduling as they did in the first place...and no doubt revisit regularly...& make adjustments. Brexit is only one of a vast number of variables involved. That's the idea of JIT!
Stockpiling possibly, not definitely, will be needed in some cases, but only during transition.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I’m not mocking them I’m pointing out that they have access in all but name to the single market and it benefits them. Boris is trying to hoodwink people by using them as an example of why a hard brexit will be OK, he’s then mocking the chequers plan in the next breath at the same time saying that it isn’t what people voted for and we’ll still be tied into EU standards and law. That’s exactly what Switzerland has done to gain access to the single market. Adopted EU law by way of a treaty to gain access to the single market for its manufacturing industries. There really isn’t much difference between Switzerland’s arrangement and the chequers plan. If anything Switzerland’s arrangement is even further away from what he’s trying to say people voted for than chequers is.
Oh...you mean moves to accommodate the necessary changes are already happening? Gasp!over 2.5 million trucks arrive from the EU every year, add 10 minutes to processing each of them at the port and you get some osrt of idea of the scale of the issue.
Holland have taken on over 750 extra customs officers to deal with vehicles arriving from the UK.
Oh...you mean moves to accommodate the necessary changes are already happening? Gasp!
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Despite talking a degree of sense on some issues, he has blotted his copybook so many times he has become figure of fun predominantly to most us I suspect (and always was to a significant proprtion anyhow...but peolle listened. Don't think they do anymore outside of the media)
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
That's why the scheduling would need to be revisited. It isn't rocket science. They just simply undertake the same process in scheduling as they did in the first place...and no doubt revisit regularly...& make adjustments. Brexit is only one of a vast number of variables involved. That's the idea of JIT!
Stockpiling possibly, not definitely, will be needed in some cases, but only during transition.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
JIT worked before the EU, it works in non-EU countries. The scheduling has to be changed, may or may not result in additional costs. Hardly a cliff-edge...but hey, I love a good drama
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Will almost certainly result in additional costs. Free movement of goods are critical with JIT manufacturing. The alternative is stockpiling which means investment in material, investment in infrastructure to hold those materials and investment in capital because materials have to be bank rolled while they’re sitting on a shelf waiting to be used.? It’s not just final assembly that is put at risk it’s all the manufacturers in the supply chain that carry the risk. If you’re a U.K. supplier of widgets to a manufacturer in the EU and all of a sudden you have a customs barrier in the chain it’s an unknown to deal with and you have to prepare for every eventuality and possibility.
Suddenly you are an expert on JiT?
Surely you just build in an extra customs delay. Not the end of the world. Same thing in reverse, and what about components sourced from USA/Taiwan/China etc., that is even more tricky.
Suddenly you are an expert on JiT?
JIT worked before the EU
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?