Explain yourself.
So what part is wrong?
Why is it that I point out the bad with Brexit and other things in the EU but the Brexit part is ignored by certain people and the bad parts of the EU are ignored or argued against even though they are so obviously right?
So I quote things without reading them?The article you linked wasn’t even about brexit. I doubt you were even aware of the author or his opinion on brexit until you found a headline that suited your argument and I pointed out what the authors opinions was on brexit today.
Yes they need to start at the bottom. But they have been trying for years to get rid of the mafia problem.
But short term how does the problem get resolved?
So I quote things without reading them?
Take a day off. Of course I read what I link.
Have I?
I didn't vote leave. I have never voted UKIP like someone on here hey Tony.
You are only happy with someone who says EU good UK bad.
So are you disagreeing with SB or myself?
Was it you that agreed with me that Italy is too big to fail but too big to save?
And for putting things in your mouth? That is where I call you out when contradicting yourself. Or saying the opposite of someone that you always normally agree with no matter how wrong they are.
Some economists and scientists alike have been predicting doom and gloom for a while now. National and personal debt in many countries spiralling, trade wars between major nations, slowdown and uncertainty in some manufacturing industries, Nuclear arms agreements being revoked etc, fresh water shortages, famine, civil wars, environmental and ecological destruction.........At the end of the day if there is a sensible Bexit deal for both sides then it really isn't going to have the impact other world crises are having on everyday life for many people.
So I quote things without reading them?
Take a day off. Of course I read what I link.
Yes of course you do..how could I have ever doubted that...
And, yes, the Italy dilemma is that it is too big to fail, but too big to save. It won’t be another Greece.
The uncertainty caused by Brexit and Trump’s tariff war is already making the situation worse as Eurozone growth starts to slow, along with the world economy led by China.
No they haven’t. Successive governments have been complicit with the mafia for decades and have tread the same path. Any arrests and investigations have been for show not effect and on the whole the ringleaders are left unscathed.
The current government is about blaming the EU when it should be looking within first and then demanding EU assistance to deal with it.
What a load of shite. Don't expect anything else from you these days though.Always. That’s been long established. You’re someone with a long history of disagreeing with posters by agreeing with them while not realising that you were. I’ve lost count of the amount of times that you’ve posted a link based on a headline that you’ve presumed backs you but when you actually read the article it either dismisses you or confirms what the other poster has told you in the first place. We’ll call it doing an astute if you like.
The problem is that some can't handle the truth.So you would've thought a sensible deal would be a top priority for all. I note that those who appear to want to see the UK fail post Brexit were quoting Eurozone growth figures last year and earlier this, and some would say gloating when the economy slowed down in the UK. Well as everyone knows economies/growth will vary from month to month, quarter to quarter, year to year for a variety of reasons. Eurozone last quarter was 0.2 (0.4 previous quarter), UK was 0.6 for third quarter (0.4 for previous quarter). It is also to be seen how the ceasing of quantative easing (which many say has supported its consistent growth) will impact the Eurozone in the coming months.
The Eurozone slow down is not good for the UK and nor are some of the wider world issues which is why it is important for a sensible deal so as to not accentuate economic issues. Its also just as important for the EU/remainers to recognise this though.
Lost what argument?Ha ha ha, yeah good one. Confirmation again that you’ve lost the argument.
Rita Borsellino, 73, Dies; a Murder Made Her an Anti-Mafia CrusaderCorrect, the mafia is so embedded within the government it's more less impossible to put it to an end. It's funny how after the bombings in Sicily and mass outrage amongst civilians, that the leader of the Sicilian mafia was suddenly found in Palermo after being on the run for years.
So you would've thought a sensible deal would be a top priority for all. I note that those who appear to want to see the UK fail post Brexit were quoting Eurozone growth figures last year and earlier this, and some would say gloating when the economy slowed down in the UK. Well as everyone knows economies/growth will vary from month to month, quarter to quarter, year to year for a variety of reasons. Eurozone last quarter was 0.2 (0.4 previous quarter), UK was 0.6 for third quarter (0.4 for previous quarter). It is also to be seen how the ceasing of quantative easing (which many say has supported its consistent growth) will impact the Eurozone in the coming months.
The Eurozone slow down is not good for the UK and nor are some of the wider world issues which is why it is important for a sensible deal so as to not accentuate economic issues. Its also just as important for the EU/remainers to recognise this though.
The problem is that some can't handle the truth.
Yes we need the EU. We all agree on this. But the EU needs us. And that is where the problem lies. They need our money. And they will do what they can to keep getting our money.
In all seriousness at what point does the result come in to question? Is there any set criteria or is it based on what the government and / or public opinion dictates?
In all seriousness at what point does the result come in to question? Is there any set criteria or is it based on what the government and / or public opinion dictates?
Well as the remain side had a £9 million soviet style propaganda leaflet - which has proven to be a pack of lies - I’d say the remain side was heavily weighted in terms of manipulation from the start.
There is no verdict on this either is there?
Yet it was full of lies and predictions that were miles away from what happened. It was all about the benefits of remaining.Well you would. The leaflet had to be produced because of the HOL and was outside of the regulated campaign. The regulated campaign was seriously violated by leave. No amount of whataboutery will distract from that. I hope the culprits get well punished.
In all seriousness at what point does the result come in to question?
In all seriousness at what point does the result come in to question? Is there any set criteria or is it based on what the government and / or public opinion dictates?
Yet it was full of lies and predictions that were miles away from what happened. It was all about the benefits of remaining.
And as you know there was an overspend on the remain side.
Remain, not Leave, had an unfair advantage in the EU referendum - CapX
Subscribe to read | Financial Times
Official EU Remain campaign and Lib Dems fined thousands by election watchdogs
If the likes of Banks were involved in anything pro-EU-related, you'd be all over it.
Yet it was full of lies and predictions that were miles away from what happened. It was all about the benefits of remaining.
And as you know there was an overspend on the remain side.
Remain, not Leave, had an unfair advantage in the EU referendum - CapX
Subscribe to read | Financial Times
Official EU Remain campaign and Lib Dems fined thousands by election watchdogs
Talk about over simplification of a complex issue.Regardless of your stance, this is a nice piece of data visualisation:
Talk about over simplification of a complex issue.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?