Not at all.....as usual. I say about scroungers. You try to make out that I am against those who need help. You made out that we were talking about people with MS. We're they scroungers?How is it changing the subject? I'm not the one who always has to be 'right' here.
You were the one who started droning on about mobility benefits and 'scroungers', so I pointed out an example where it is fair enough if people need to use if for a car, which I believe you actually agreed with.
One man crusade? You certainly have a very inflated sense of importance.
Not at all.....as usual. I say about scroungers. You try to make out that I am against those who need help. You made out that we were talking about people with MS. We're they scroungers?
My self importance? Yeah let's get rid of monarchy because they are worthless. Let's get rid of private schools because it isn't fair on those who can't afford to send their children to private schools. So what if some can afford it.
If I had made comments lime that I would be on a one man crusade.
You are like Mart. You don't live in the UK but you want to change everything in the UK.
Sometimes I pop on this thread and think I comprehend the English language very differently to some others...
I'm still wondering why you ask obliquely tangential questions in order to try and throw a position off track.I’m still wondering which countries around the globe you’d like to live in that do not allow private education
Actually, I'm not.I'm still wondering why you ask obliquely tangential questions in order to try and throw a position off track.
Not at all.....as usual. I say about scroungers. You try to make out that I am against those who need help. You made out that we were talking about people with MS. We're they scroungers?
My self importance? Yeah let's get rid of monarchy because they are worthless. Let's get rid of private schools because it isn't fair on those who can't afford to send their children to private schools. So what if some can afford it.
If I had made comments lime that I would be on a one man crusade.
You are like Mart. You don't live in the UK but you want to change everything in the UK.
I'm still wondering why you ask obliquely tangential questions in order to try and throw a position off track.
No I didn't, that's something you've made up. I didn't make out we were talking about MS, I used it as an example to agree with you, ffs. I would get that need to play the victim all of the time looked into.
Again, more nonsense that you have made up.
My reasons for not being pro-monarchy have nothing to do with them being 'worthless'. My reasons for not liking private schools have nothing to do with it being unfair on those who can't afford to go to them.
You've just made that up or made your usual assumptions about someone's opinions.
I didn't actually make those comments, you've just made them up.
I don't want to change everything in the UK, surprise surprise...again, you've made it up.
We are both still citizens of the country, moving away does not change that.
Lie 1 proven.
A fairer system for all? As in not all can afford private education? Or would you like to explain for once.My feelings about private schools have nothing to do with prejudice, just wanting to see a fairer system for all and more investment into the education sector.
I'm wondering why you ask obliquely tangential questions in order to try and throw a position off track.Actually, I'm not.
What's your favourite school uniform, and who would you prefer to wear it?
Excellent that you agree with me.I'm wondering why you ask obliquely tangential questions in order to try and throw a position off track.
You do make me laugh. This board wouldn't be the same without you.Well I’m wondering given your mantra of fairness and equality which examples of that you can supply to support the assertion that forced denial of freedom and choices will actually be represented in the societies where such beliefs exist
That you take topics off the subject yet accuse others of the same? Yes I agree.Excellent that you agree with me.
Really, there isn't a jet engine big enoughb to make a loud enough whOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHing noise right now.That you take topics off the subject yet accuse others of the same? Yes I agree.
Really, there isn't a jet engine big enoughb to make a loud enough whOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHing noise right now.
It's either:
1. Move House
2. Blag they have moved house
3. Pay for school
Not much choice really.
Parenting pays a part as well, I'm by no means Super Nanny but when there are kids going to school and the teachers have to dress them, take them to the toilet and generally act like a parent to them they don't have time to do much else.
The problem is that other agencies that used to pick up this kind of thing are simply not there anymore. Surestart centres, multi-agency support networks which where often offshoots from social work have been axed. It seems strange that this kind of thing would even be necessary, but this vicious circle begins where you have vulnerable young people that can't access the support they need. It manifests itself, often meaning they're kicked out of school, no qualification etc and no future prospects. Then they procreate and often the circle starts again.
At the centre of this is a government that has deliberately underfunded an entire network for young people from birth through to adulthood. Not because they could never afford it, but because they simply don't give two shits.
Will remind you next time it happens.Really, there isn't a jet engine big enoughb to make a loud enough whOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHing noise right now.
I agree but there's only so much parents can blame others and agencies. There are generations of them, people who I went to school with have kids like it and they will have kids etc.
Used to feel sorry for some of the kids in the playground, no matter how bright you could tell how they will end up.
That's not being snobby, it's just how it is / was.
So how do you break the cycle? You start by investing in communities, local schools, nurseries. It has to be preventative, not just reactive. You pay for these things where you have the capacity to make a difference, instead of merely throwing money at a problem once it has happened. If you have to spend money to put a social worker in every inner-city primary and secondary school as an example, does that not ultimately work out cheaper than if that means you can influence young peoples lives to stop them falling into the penal system or things like that? It's perhaps a crude example I know, but you get the point.
Lie 1 proven.
So why should private schools be banned?
A fairer system for all? As in not all can afford private education? Or would you like to explain for once.
I agree but there's only so much parents can blame others and agencies. There are generations of them, people who I went to school with have kids like it and they will have kids etc.
Used to feel sorry for some of the kids in the playground, no matter how bright you could tell how they will end up.
That's not being snobby, it's just how it is / was.
So if it wasn't for gated communities the rich would live on council estates?Private schools should be banned for the same reason gated communities (and burkas) should IMHO. They prevent integration and the embed privilege and hidden social networks.
Any system that puts the likes of Johnson, Osborne and Cameron in charge of the country needs serious questions asking of it (and for that matter, grammar schools for the middle classes, see Corbyn in power).
Also you shouldn’t be able to opt out of the National systems becau
I don't get the gated community thing either.
If I won the lottery I'd buy a big house surrounded by a huge fence and gates.
So would those who complain. It’s the politics of envy and a desire to drag everyone down to their level
Especially as gated communities aren't even for the uber well off half the time!It’s ridiculous to claim those who oppose it are living in envy and relative poverty.
They create a divide, and offer a physical division. Place is used as a marker of division and difference.What's the issue with people living behind gates? They do go outside them, they aren't (well, not the ones I have seen) are cults where they live there and only there.
It’s ridiculous to claim those who oppose it are living in envy and relative poverty.
How many of them can afford to take advantage who oppose them then? Name some.
They create a divide, and offer a physical division. Place is used as a marker of division and difference.
So would those who complain. It’s the politics of envy and a desire to drag everyone down to their level
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?