stupot07
Well-Known Member
Yep, and kids develop at different rates. Stevenson will come good, as I'm sure some of the others will too.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I don’t get this with some city fans saying that now we have Bayliss we can sell outlet other youngsters.
Stevenson has a bright future ahead of him-as have the DKE twins.
We should aim to keep our young players and reap the rewards of playing youngsters who have an affinity with the club.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Yeah, but do disagree on Devon Kelly-Evans. I still maintain that Dion is the better of the two.Yep, and kids develop at different rates. Stevenson will come good, as I'm sure some of the others will too.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
They play in different positions so have different attributes. Dion will be more tenacious as he's a defender, Devon is an attacking midfielder, so will have better vision for example. For what it's worth, I don't think we've seen the best of Devon, and I don't think we will whilst hes playing on the wing. He's not a winger for me, and would be better in a central midfield 3, or on the hole a bit like Oztumer who is of a similar statue for Walsall.Yeah, but do disagree on Devon Kelly-Evans. I still maintain that Dion is the better of the two.
He's more tenacious and has a better touch.
Might well be right, stu. Don't like him on the wing, but I don't think there is anything stopping him being tenacious.They play in different positions so have different attributes. Dion will be more tenacious as he's a defender, Devon is an attacking midfielder, so will have better vision for example. For what it's worth, I don't think we've seen the best of Devon, and I don't think we will whilst hes playing on the wing. He's not a winger for me, and would be better in a central midfield 3, or on the hole a bit like Oztumer who is of a similar statue for Walsall.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
They play in different positions so have different attributes. Dion will be more tenacious as he's a defender, Devon is an attacking midfielder, so will have better vision for example. For what it's worth, I don't think we've seen the best of Devon, and I don't think we will whilst hes playing on the wing. He's not a winger for me, and would be better in a central midfield 3, or on the hole a bit like Oztumer who is of a similar statue for Walsall.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Devon just looks like a carbon copy of his brother
I can tell the difference. Not visually, but in their play. Dion has a better first touch on him. He is stronger too.I think Dion and Devon are more similar than you think, they even look the same!
I don’t get this with some city fans saying that now we have Bayliss we can sell outlet other youngsters.
Stevenson has a bright future ahead of him-as have the DKE twins.
We should aim to keep our young players and reap the rewards of playing youngsters who have an affinity with the club.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Baylis is the best young player I have seen for ages at this club.
A nightmare to defend against because he drives forward with power and intent.
Two footed and intelligent.
Won’t be here for long, that’s inevitable.
What are you talking about?Who were the coaches telling robins Bayliss wasn’t ready for the first team
They need to go
What are you talking about?
Who said he wasn't ready did I miss something?
It is this standard froth at the mouth bullshit
Not sure we can do that. Not him behind a front two. What would then give us the width of two wide players?Or you could have Tom Bayliss in a three in midfield with Doyle and Kelly .
That would allow Tom Bayliss to play behind the front two , leaving him free to attack the penalty box witch would lead to alot more penalties and free kicks around the penalty box .
Didn't I just say that?The width would come from the fullbacks when we have the ball and are on the attack !!!
Bayliss is a huge goal threat compared to Kelly, Doyle, Stevenson , who all barely venture into opposition penalty area.
He could or should have scored in all the games hes played in apart from Port Vale.
This lad will score alot of goals. His first first instinct is to attack and run at the opposition defence. His driving runs forward are excellent. No fear.
Havnt seen that from one of CENTRAL midfielders in years.
Just cant help but but get very excited about this lad.
Afraid Kelly will have to bide his time.
That Burroughs looks really promising too and again in the Bayliss mould.If he gets the pppurtunity for taking free kicks and set plays more it will bring him on , as for the other lads I am quietly confident for them, the only concern is when we get promoted will there be a place for them . I do like DKE but it’s one of those players that can look fantastic and playing like a prem player then sometimes he is all over the place chasing the game. I am quite happy with the up and coming contingent and if they develop together and stay together on this team it could be good news in the long run for CCFC , they are still pups in my eyes
That Burroughs looks really promising too and again in the Bayliss mould.
Yes but not wing backs , we don't have any fullbacks who can play as wing backs !
Just let the fullbacks overlap when we have the ball but they're there to defend first and only attack when teams are sitting deep with 10 men behind the ball ! of course you don't have the two fullbacks attacking at the same time so we're not too open at the back .
Another Leicester born player as well.
Diamond?Or you could have Tom Bayliss in a three in midfield with Doyle and Kelly .
That would allow Tom Bayliss to play behind the front two , leaving him free to attack the penalty box witch would lead to alot more penalties and free kicks around the penalty box .
Who were the coaches telling robins Bayliss wasn’t ready for the first team
They need to go
Maycock has been in and around first team a month or two before Bayliss has.I do wonder why we signed maycock up first when bayliss is out of contract...not that I'm criticising maycock I've never seen him play
Seen a bit of Maycock and would say Bayliss looks much the better player, although their styles are different.Maycock has been in and around first team a month or two before Bayliss has.
Maycock seen a few times, came on for Liam Kelly vs Stevenage. Was awfull. Ran around like a headless chicken without even touching the ball. Not really stood out apart from looking out of his depth. But obviously must have something about him if his contract was extended.
Slightly unfair to judge him on that 45 minutes.
Bayliss should get a four year contract in next few weeks.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?