Sterling Archer
Well-Known Member
I said before today's game that regardless of today's result, I'm not sure Mowbray is the right choice for what we need. He's only really succeeded one season and that was with Middlesbrough.
The Telegraph have been pushing him as the saviour but I'm not sure he's the right man, I want him to be but there's just something nagging.
12 games in, 4 wins, 4 draws and 4 defeats before today's game is an OK record. Or is it? Are the players still not playing to the sum of their parts or are they just really not very good? I've been told on many an occasion that we have a squad with the 7th highest budget (wages) in the league but maybe they aren't good signings or maybe we've now got two managers who cannot get the best out of them?
The same form (prior to today's game) over the season would see us with approximately 61 Points, mid table in League One.
12 goals scored in those 12 games harks back to the full Coleman days but if he's just doing the necessary to keep us in the division, that's fine by me. I still like to think we should be ambitious enough to want to see us score more goals and win more games in League One.
What's more worrying is not being able to shake this awful home record of ours.
He has my full support whilst in charge and he is comfortably the "biggest name" we could've attracted but I'd have rather us gone for someone succeeding in League Two or possibly conference. I guess the experiences of Adams, Dowie, Boothroyd (a promotion under their belt before falling badly) has scarred me but I see Mowbray's career as being very similar to the aforementioned names.
Maybe it is the players? Maybe he's the best we could've got? Maybe I'm just sick and tired of accepting below mediocrity? Maybe I'm sick and tired of the Telegraph painting him as the messiah (he's not, he's a very naughty boy).
I do pray the usual buffoons don't misread this and think I want him sacked, far from it, just instigating some debate.
Thoughts?
The Telegraph have been pushing him as the saviour but I'm not sure he's the right man, I want him to be but there's just something nagging.
12 games in, 4 wins, 4 draws and 4 defeats before today's game is an OK record. Or is it? Are the players still not playing to the sum of their parts or are they just really not very good? I've been told on many an occasion that we have a squad with the 7th highest budget (wages) in the league but maybe they aren't good signings or maybe we've now got two managers who cannot get the best out of them?
The same form (prior to today's game) over the season would see us with approximately 61 Points, mid table in League One.
12 goals scored in those 12 games harks back to the full Coleman days but if he's just doing the necessary to keep us in the division, that's fine by me. I still like to think we should be ambitious enough to want to see us score more goals and win more games in League One.
What's more worrying is not being able to shake this awful home record of ours.
He has my full support whilst in charge and he is comfortably the "biggest name" we could've attracted but I'd have rather us gone for someone succeeding in League Two or possibly conference. I guess the experiences of Adams, Dowie, Boothroyd (a promotion under their belt before falling badly) has scarred me but I see Mowbray's career as being very similar to the aforementioned names.
Maybe it is the players? Maybe he's the best we could've got? Maybe I'm just sick and tired of accepting below mediocrity? Maybe I'm sick and tired of the Telegraph painting him as the messiah (he's not, he's a very naughty boy).
I do pray the usual buffoons don't misread this and think I want him sacked, far from it, just instigating some debate.
Thoughts?
Last edited: