Transfer targets (16 Viewers)

Viktor17

Well-Known Member
The club know what CoH wants. The 2 parties were not aligned, hence COh comment no contract been presented.

He will stay at what he believes his worth is, suspect we may move a little, but like Hamer, if he wanted to stay with a decent offer from
Club, he would have.

Good luck to him, he doesn’t owe the club anything which some seem to think he does.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
The club know what CoH wants. The 2 parties were not aligned, hence COh comment no contract been presented.

He will stay at what he believes his worth is, suspect we may move a little, but like Hamer, if he wanted to stay with a decent offer from
Club, he would have.

Good luck to him, he doesn’t owe the club anything which some seem to think he does.
Bollox
Course he does we gsve him his first team chance and have paid his wages for no work performance for almost a year!
Doesn’t mean he’ll stay but there’s mutual respect there
The things certain are
He will be sold if he doesn’t sign during January
Robins loves him
Ohare loves robins
He’s hugely popular in the squad
He’s hugely popular to the fans

he’s the last of the 3 stars but we are already seeing the rise of others
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
We wouldn’t get much money for him in Jan considering he can go for a free in summer, so keeping him till the end of the season will give us the best chance of a push for the playoffs
 

Deity

Well-Known Member
We wouldn’t get much money for him in Jan considering he can go for a free in summer, so keeping him till the end of the season will give us the best chance of a push for the playoffs
This is the crux of the clubs dilemma

What fee in January is the minimum we need to make the decision to let him go the right one ?

In reality we are chasing the 6th play off spot. At a push 5th or 6th spot. The others have gone already.

It’s easy to say turn down the money and focus on the play off push but if we fall short we then have to replace COH in the summer with an even smaller pot of money.
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
This is the crux of the clubs dilemma

What fee in January is the minimum we need to make the decision to let him go the right one ?

In reality we are chasing the 6th play off spot. At a push 5th or 6th spot. The others have gone already.

It’s easy to say turn down the money and focus on the play off push but if we fall short we then have to replace COH in the summer with an even smaller pot of money.

We wouldn’t be able to get a player like him at his stage, so I would keep CoH and spend some of the Gus money on the next one with a few years of development needed to replace him. Then spend a decent amount on that Gus replacement we still need.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Michael Obafemi could become available I think

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
And would we refuse that?
Statement if so but we mustn’t allow any of our better players to have less than 12 months left again

I know there was a big reason why this has happened
It's unavoidable sometimes and certainly was in this case. Giving some players overly long contracts can be equally as risky.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
And would we refuse that?
Statement if so but we mustn’t allow any of our better players to have less than 12 months left again

I know there was a big reason why this has happened

Depends on the player and league position at the time of the offer I guess. We’ve closed the gap on top six recently which if we keep it up, hopefully makes us a more attractive option for new players….and ohare to stay…come on Cal, sign up, it’s Christmas !
 

GaryJones

Well-Known Member
If he chooses not to sign and starts looking elsewhere this also represents a huge gamble on his part too remember - imagine the scenario if he doesn’t sign then in the latter part of this season he picks up another serious injury!
This is not that straightforward or a done deal yet - anything could happen.
He should sign now for a year with a buyout clause inserted - this makes perfect sense to me and shows some loyalty to the club which stood by him for that year when he was out of action.
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
Gets you Callum Styles on a perm. If he won't sign, it's good business.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Is he any better than what we have? I don't know but am not sure he is. Isn't he more of a central midfield player anyway. If O'Hare went we need a number 10 and a centre forward.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Depends on the player and league position at the time of the offer I guess. We’ve closed the gap on top six recently which if we keep it up, hopefully makes us a more attractive option for new players….and ohare to stay…come on Cal, sign up, it’s Christmas !
Very true
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
Is he any better than what we have? I don't know but am not sure he is. Isn't he more of a central midfield player anyway. If O'Hare went we need a number 10 and a centre forward.

Centre mid who’s played a lot of time at LWB. Think he’d fit in the 433 lineup very well. Agree though we’d still need O’Hare or another number 10. That’s maybe where Twine comes into the equation.
 

Cally Fedora

Well-Known Member
Look at it from the buyers perspective. A player who is out of contract in six months and has had a huge amount of time out with a serious injury. It’s not a combination that draws a big offer. We’ll look to sell him in Jan and he and his agent will want a summer move with a fair chunk of the saved transfer fee split between them.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
Hmm. You know I like Styles, we've been here before.

He's no O'Hare though!
I didn't say he was I just meant you get 2 million which pays for his fee and you own him for 4 years or whatever. No brainer to me. O'Hare would still have to be replaced elsewhere.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

Flying Fokker

Well-Known Member
O'Hare being offered a big bucks new contract is a really tough one. Today and in many earlier matches he has looked a bit off the pace and reluctant to tackle like he used to. Against Birmingham and in glimpses at Sunderland he looked back to his best. I still think he has some way to go to regain his consistent form before his injuries and may struggle with two games a week. There is still that lingering doubt his injury may recur. We look mugs if he leaves on a free and prospers, or we pay him a fortune and he breaks down. The outcome is in the laps of the Gods (and our staff). Clearly we can't get away with the one year contracts we offered Jodie Jones
+++

£2m max I reckon
I’d risk paying him a big salary. So if he’s worth £2m to someone he must be worth £750k to us.

5k per week over 3 years on top of his wages may not be enough for him?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I’d risk paying him a big salary. So if he’s worth £2m to someone he must be worth £750k to us.

5k per week over 3 years on top of his wages may not be enough for him?

Sounds like he wants £25k/wk as that’s what Wright is on.

That’s £5.2m over a four year deal, though it would probably be 3.5 so more like £4.5m

I’d argue we’ll be spending that on wages and fee for a replacement anyway. £10k/wk is £1.8m over three and a half years, and that’s at the cheap end. So the question is is he worth £2.5m give or take? I think the answer is obviously yes. For about the same cash if not a little more you’re getting Scott Twine who has hardly set the division alight.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Sounds like he wants £25k/wk as that’s what Wright is on.

That’s £5.2m over a four year deal, though it would probably be 3.5 so more like £4.5m

I’d argue we’ll be spending that on wages and fee for a replacement anyway. £10k/wk is £1.8m over three and a half years, and that’s at the cheap end. So the question is is he worth £2.5m give or take? I think the answer is obviously yes. For about the same cash if not a little more you’re getting Scott Twine who has hardly set the division alight.
When put like that it’s a no brainer
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top