Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (14 Viewers)

fatso · Sunday at 11:10 AM

Sky Blue Pete said:
Protests don’t have to be peaceful to be
Lawful

That depends on your definition of "peaceful"
I'm sure you will find the local police chief will make that call, as he's the one held responsible if things go T.U.

In London last year the public were outraged at the disruption caused by "just stop oil"
And there were a number of complaints raised about "soft policing" "two tier" policing and accusing police of standing idly by and doing nothing, even when emergency services vehicles were being held up.

So it's clearly a difficult situation for the police to manage.

Brighton Sky Blue · Sunday at 11:25 AM

fatso said:
There's a huge difference between protesting peacefully, and doing so in a place that's directly going to cause a breach of the peace.

For example, that lad who shouted abuse at Prince Andrew during the Queens funeral procession, he was very quickly silenced and ejected, and quite rightly so.
And we all know Prince Andrew is a "wrong un" but there's a time and a place.

In short, you DO have the right to peaceful protest, but you DO NOT have the right to decide when and where to protest.
The police have a duty to protect life and property and that will take precedent.

You have the right to protest, but only when and where the state decides? In cases such as this extra protection should be given to those expressing the 'unpopular' opinion, instead of censorship.

wingy · Sunday at 11:27 AM

Brighton Sky Blue said:
You have the right to protest, but only when and where the state decides? In cases such as this extra protection should be given to those expressing the 'unpopular' opinion, instead of censorship.

That ain't gonna happen when you've got an authoritarian in command, fascist.

Brighton Sky Blue · Sunday at 11:28 AM

wingy said:
That ain't gonna happen when you've got an authoritarian in command, fascist.

Intrigued to know when fatso thinks it's acceptable for someone to declare their opposition to the monarchy in this country.

fatso · Sunday at 11:42 AM

Brighton Sky Blue said:
You have the right to protest, but only when and where the state decides? In cases such as this extra protection should be given to those expressing the 'unpopular' opinion, instead of censorship.

It's not censorship if the police decides your action is likely to endanger life or property.

The protesters at the coronation (for example) could of walked the few hundred yards to Hyde park, and protested quite lawfully. Without the fear/risk of causing a disturbance.

SBT · Sunday at 12:03 PM

fatso said:
In short, you DO have the right to peaceful protest, but you DO NOT have the right to decide when and where to protest.

Yes you do. You have the right to protest in any public place. If the police subsequently want to restrict such a protest then it’s incumbent on them to prove to a court or the government that it poses a threat to public order.

Brighton Sky Blue · Sunday at 12:19 PM

fatso said:
It's not censorship if the police decides your action is likely to endanger life or property.

The protesters at the coronation (for example) could of walked the few hundred yards to Hyde park, and protested quite lawfully. Without the fear/risk of causing a disturbance.

Who is going to kill someone over saying there shouldn't be a monarchy? Likewise, who is going to kill someone over protesting against Israel?

Sick Boy · Sunday at 12:36 PM

Otis said:
Honestly, where does Trump get these people from?

BBC News - Trump envoy dismisses Starmer plan for Ukraine

Trump envoy Steve Witkoff dismisses Starmer plan for Ukraine

Steve Witkoff says the UK plans for an international force to support a ceasefire are a "posture".

www.bbc.com

Putin is not a bad guy? And he likes him?

Ukraine is a false country?

Unbelievable really isn't it

It was always going to get dismissed. I’m surprised Starmer didn’t wear army gear in the photo though.

rondog1973 · Sunday at 12:55 PM

fatso said:
It's not censorship if the police decides your action is likely to endanger life or property.

The protesters at the coronation (for example) could of walked the few hundred yards to Hyde park, and protested quite lawfully. Without the fear/risk of causing a disturbance.

Was there a danger to life or property at the Coronation protests?

Could have btw.

Sick Boy · Sunday at 12:58 PM

fatso said:
There's a huge difference between protesting peacefully, and doing so in a place that's directly going to cause a breach of the peace.

For example, that lad who shouted abuse at Prince Andrew during the Queens funeral procession, he was very quickly silenced and ejected, and quite rightly so.
And we all know Prince Andrew is a "wrong un" but there's a time and a place.

In short, you DO have the right to peaceful protest, but you DO NOT have the right to decide when and where to protest.
The police have a duty to protect life and property and that will take precedent.

What danger to life was there caused by someone shouting at Andy?

fatso · Sunday at 1:10 PM

Sick Boy said:
What danger to life was there caused by someone shouting at Andy?

Probably someone in the crowd knocking the twats teeth out.

fatso · Sunday at 1:11 PM

rondog1973 said:
Was there a danger to life or property at the Coronation protests?

Could have btw.

I don't know. I wasn't there, you'd need to ask the met police chief who I'd imagine gave the instruction to move them on.

Brighton Sky Blue · Sunday at 1:15 PM

fatso said:
Probably someone in the crowd knocking the twats teeth out.

The mask has slipped.

Sick Boy · Sunday at 1:15 PM

fatso said:
Probably someone in the crowd knocking the twats teeth out.

For what?

fatso · Sunday at 1:16 PM

Brighton Sky Blue said:
Who is going to kill someone over saying there shouldn't be a monarchy? Likewise, who is going to kill someone over protesting against Israel?

Well go and protest outside a mosque against Islam, or Muhammad or shariah law, and see how you get on.

I mean who would kill someone over protesting about a long dead prophet?

Try being a Jew in London just going about your legal daily business when there's a pro Palestine march going on.

Should the police allow a pro Palestine March to go through a Jewish area, and if so who's at fault if someone gets hurt?

fatso · Sunday at 1:17 PM

Brighton Sky Blue said:
The mask has slipped.

You clearly have no argument left.

Brighton Sky Blue · Sunday at 1:24 PM

fatso said:
You clearly have no argument left.

Yours is clearly that criticising the monarchy deserves a beating.

fatso · Sunday at 1:24 PM

Sick Boy said:
For what?

Showing such disregard and disrespect for the Queen's funeral.

(Not for upsetting Andrew, he's just a nonce)

fatso · Sunday at 1:26 PM

Brighton Sky Blue said:
The mask has slipped.

You might be the kind of low life scumbag who thinks it's OK to scream and shout obscenities at a funeral, but I don't.

So if that puts me in a different boat to you, then trust me, I'm more than happy.

fatso · Sunday at 1:27 PM

Brighton Sky Blue said:
Yours is clearly that criticising the monarchy deserves a beating.

Your clueless.

Sick Boy · Sunday at 1:31 PM

fatso said:
Showing such disregard and disrespect for the Queen's funeral.

(Not for upsetting Andrew, he's just a nonce)

If you think he's a nonce, I'd be more concerned about him escaping unpunished than someone shouting something nasty at him. Luckily, not everyone is a subservient cap doffer who thinks the Royals are above the law.

fatso · Sunday at 1:38 PM

Sick Boy said:
you think he's a nonce, I'd be more concerned about him escaping unpunished than someone shouting something nasty at him. Luckily, not everyone is a subservient cap doffer who thinks the Royals are above the law.

I look forward to the day Andrew gets to answer for his crimes in court.

Unfortunately in the court of social media it's almost impossible to hold one point of view without some idiot coming out and saying you are 100% pro or anti that issue.

This being a typical example, I've said it's disrespectful for anyone to shout abuse and obscenities at a funeral, so you now say, I must be a "subservient cap doffer" and no doubt in your tiny mind I'm now a 100% loyalist supporter, honestly it's laughable.

Sick Boy · Sunday at 1:46 PM

fatso said:
I look forward to the day Andrew gets to answer for his crimes in court.

Unfortunately in the court of social media it's almost impossible to hold one point of view without some idiot coming out and saying you are 100% pro or anti that issue.

This being a typical example, I've said it's disrespectful for anyone to shout abuse and obscenities at a funeral, so you now say, I must be a "subservient cap doffer" and no doubt in your tiny mind I'm now a 100% loyalist supporter, honestly it's laughable.

I didn't say you were, it was just a remark in general - don't be such a snowflake.

fatso · Sunday at 1:48 PM

Sick Boy said:
I didn't say you were, it was just a remark in general - don't be such a snowflake.

Lol, that's the first time I've ever been called a snowflake! I'll take that as a compliment

Sky_Blue_Dreamer · Sunday at 1:49 PM

fatso said:
Your clueless.

Really doesn't work when you get the wrong you're

SBT · Monday at 5:30 PM

Yeah we’re totally screwed

The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans

U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat about upcoming military strikes in Yemen. I didn’t think it could be real. Then the bombs started falling.

www.theatlantic.com

mmttww · Monday at 6:54 PM

SBT said:
Yeah we’re totally screwed

The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans

U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat about upcoming military strikes in Yemen. I didn’t think it could be real. Then the bombs started falling.

www.theatlantic.com

Has Team Trump claimed it was deliberate yet?

chiefdave · Monday at 8:20 PM

SBT said:
Yeah we’re totally screwed

The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans

U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat about upcoming military strikes in Yemen. I didn’t think it could be real. Then the bombs started falling.

www.theatlantic.com

while everyone is busy laughing at how incompetent they are Justin Amash raised a good point. They didn't take this to congress as they claimed it was an emergency situation, this chat shows that was entirely untrue.

SkyBlueCharlie9 · Tuesday at 8:16 AM

fatso said:
Lol, that's the first time I've ever been called a snowflake! I'll take that as a compliment

Compassionate, kind and logical Fatso ? .... nah I'm not buying it. !

PVA · Tuesday at 11:31 AM

That story is astonishing. I'm sure MAGA will be as outraged by this as they were by Hilary's emails.

Oh wait - President Donald Trump said yesterday he knew nothing about the incident, and is "not a big fan of The Atlantic" - whose editor-in-chief first reported on the leak.

The emojis in response to dropping bombs is wild

'Steve Witkoff responded with five emoji: two hands-praying, a flexed bicep, and two American flags.'

SkyBlueMatt · Tuesday at 11:58 AM

Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk

PVA · Tuesday at 8:10 PM

Pissed up, sex pest and women abuser appointed as defence Secretary? Great guy.

Journalist added to conversation discussing classified information through no fault of his own? Sleazebag.

Flying Fokker · Tuesday at 10:06 PM

worth a listen. A mix of Trump and Umarine.

Flying Fokker · Wednesday at 6:55 AM

Sky Blue Pete · Wednesday at 7:11 AM

Flying Fokker said:
View attachment 42209

Least he speaks his mind and he’s a man of the people

Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (14 Viewers)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency