Nick
Administrator
He probably wasn't trying to patronise me with it was he?
He probably wasn't trying to patronise me with it was he?I was referring more to the last few months. If you haven't used it at least 10 times then I will apologise for using you as an example.
On the subject of the hashtag, never seen you say this before when people have used it. I'm sure Stupot used it a couple of weeks ago (if I'm wrong I hold my hands up) possibly on a Wasps thread that you had posted on too but never seen you have a pop at him. However, I'm sure if it was Stupot and on a Wasps thread then I'm sure it was just an oversight on your part........
You counting? Now that is stalker beahivour. Whose crying? I find it funny I've wound you up over the Internet. You must live a sheltered life to call people cocks over a Internet forum
He probably wasn't trying to patronise me with it was he?
Oh, so it wasn't the hashtag then?
Not counting, two is an easy number to remember without using fingers, you ought to try it sometime. You havent wound me up girlfriend like I say just being honest.
Clearly you are counting, that's why you rememberedgirlfriend? okay, stick to your cringey yank phrases, I'm going to pub with the lads and then Yeovil tomorrow. Hard life being a cock
Another poll? Astonishing. Is this really what we need to be doing? Where are the mass meetings, the properly organised protests, the membership renewal?
We need more ideas like your invention of the Sky Blue Ribboning of the town and the two hour silent sit-ins at Sixfields. The irony and effectiveness of both was lost on many who didn't have the power of understanding needed but they totally contributed to our return to the Ricoh more than Marches, Banners and Boycotts and that's now on the record as a verifiable and historical fact.
Steve, I reckon you and the other Board members should hand over to the people on here who seem to have the answers to everything and know exactly how things should be done!
Good Idea. Could be the big second chance that some have been dreaming of to get their noses back in the ego trough and a gorge on the adulation of being a self appointed representative of no one but themselves. Perhaps an opportunity to start another scheme of crackpot campaigns and tedious self righteous emails frothing with pompous rhetorical nonsense. Seeing the Council are home and dry though and no longer need any apparatchiks running distraction plays for them what would be the point eh?
Ha Ha Ha Ha
Its nice to have laughter on the site for once (for whatever reason it was posted) as opposed to bickering!
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
Its nice to have laughter on the site for once
Instead of bickering, why don't we have a vote of some description? Get the trust to poll supporters on things more often. I think when Preston Haskell was just about to step in and buy everything (before he tragically didn't) I think he was going to give The Trust Board control over all playing issues as he famously "knows nothing about Football...". They could have run weekly polls to pick the team, decide on transfers, catering options, whether to put us in admin, or pay the rent etc. it would've been ace. Much more better than that bonkers text a sub idea that never caught on. We need more democracy not less!
You are a bit lost now I think.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't think you will find any investors putting in millions and then turn over any kind of control of that money to supporters.
Why aren't the trust sharing information from the stadium forum? Sworn to secrecy??
I imagine they have been asked to wait until the minutes are published, which sounds fair enough, otherwise we get rumours that are false rather than the official line (which may also be false).
He probably wasn't trying to patronise me with it was he?
I don't think you will find any investors putting in millions and then turn over any kind of control of that money to supporters.
That is Precisely what Preston Haskell IV was proposing to the Sky Blue Trust Leadership. It could have happened and that is the Tragedy of this whole situation.
I don't mind the trust holding a poll at all, at least there's an attempt to be democratic. However what strikes me is that once again the actions proposed aren't going to do anything other than alienate the club, who clearly already don't trust the Trust.
How can you now sit down and talk calmly to a man who you have just proposed publicly should be sacked. This isn't the way to build bridges.
Fisher, for better or worse, is paid by SISU. If we get someone else to replace him, they will represent SISU too, and therefore are likely to be about as useful.
For what it's worth, I'd just keep it polite, and keep niggling away with the specific questions. How much will the stadium cost, where will it be, how will we finance it, is this impacting on the playing budget etc. Many of the same questions could be asked regarding the ongoing legal actions.
If we make this 'us and them', then as satisfying as it is to keep having public digs, where does it get us?
And that's exactly what I'm talking about. If you went up to Fisher and said that, would you be surprised if he just ignored you.
Sure, you'd feel better, but other than that where does this kind of approach actually get us?
And that attitude is why our fanbase has turned into bickering between eachother softies.
I must have missed you running on the pitch, smashing everything up and burning down SISU HQ?
Ah I see your in I am a constant prick mode again.
Completely agree about the negotiation point, but what you're saying could just as easily be used to justify more radical/confrontational protests. Clearly there are large portions of the fanbase who see no benefit in trying to "build bridges" or "keep it polite", because they either feel it's a fruitless endeavour, or that things are far more urgent than that. The way we handle our stadium plans over the next 6-18 months will define the long-term future of the club, and I fully expect things to come to a head one way or another once it all comes out in the open.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?