God you're fucking tedious. Google him if you're that desperate to find out about him.
It was a throwaway tweet about a Russian nut job. Quite why you want to spend your time forensically analysing his background is beyond me.
You also didn’t say she was. Someone had to bring balance to the discussion. You’re welcome.I didn't say she wasn't?
You also didn’t say she was. Someone had to bring balance to the discussion. You’re welcome.
You’re thinking of voting brexit to punish big corporations. How did that work out by the way? I’ll check my notes. You crashed the pound inflating big corporations overseas profits sending their share values through the roof. No, that didn’t work. Maybe you voted brexit to empower the hard left. How did that work out? I’ll check my notes again. It says brexit converted them to hard right smashing the red wall and giving Boris Johnson a record majority so he could fuck you over with your blessing.Do you understand balance Tony? Is that like voting UKIP to offset the threat of UKIP?
Do you understand balance Tony? Is that like voting UKIP to offset the threat of UKIP?
You really don't understand the argumentYou’re thinking of voting brexit to punish big corporations. How did that work out by the way? I’ll check my notes. You crashed the pound inflating big corporations overseas profits sending their share values through the roof. No, that didn’t work. Maybe you voted brexit to empower the hard left. How did that work out? I’ll check my notes again. It says brexit converted them to hard right smashing the red wall and giving Boris Johnson a record majority so he could fuck you over with your blessing.
You’re not to good at this balance thing yourself.
What argument are you talking about? All I did was fill in your gap that this woman is a nut job herself, which she is. You couldn’t counter that so went off on a tangent which given your own history of what you thought you were voting for against what it turned out to be and your “reasoning” for doing so in the first place is a glass house of an argument for you. What I said in both cases is factually correct.You really don't understand the argument
If these tanks are as effective as believed to be this could be a game changer. Especially if Russia really is sending 1950’s era tanks to the front lines. It should be shooting fish in a barrel.
Ukraine war: Germany sends much-awaited Leopard tanks
The first 18 of the cutting-edge tanks are sent, amid reports UK Challenger 2s have also arrived.www.bbc.co.uk
She shouldn’t have poked the bear.What a fucked up country. Poor little girl.
Well that's cheerful.Dmitry Muratov: Nuclear warning from Russia's Nobel-winning journalist
Dmitry Muratov says Russian propaganda is preparing people to think nuclear war isn't a bad thing.www.bbc.com
Dmitry Muratov: Nuclear warning from Russia's Nobel-winning journalist
Dmitry Muratov says Russian propaganda is preparing people to think nuclear war isn't a bad thing.www.bbc.com
Boomer by name…Boomer by nature. And if I may say, STFU.Boomers all over the world causing utter fucking chaos really
The bear shouldn’t have poked…Russia's border with NATO just doubled in size.
Another strategic masterstroke from Putin.
Similar to pre-2014 hardly any NATO forces in the "border" countries. Then a small increase. Since invasion significant increases in NATO troops and equipment in these areas and destined to stay for a long timeRussia's border with NATO just doubled in size.
Another strategic masterstroke from Putin.
Undoubtedly will be used by the Russian propaganda machine. "We said NATO were looking to put more troops closer to our border. They have. NATO cannot be trusted. We can".Similar to pre-2014 hardly any NATO forces in the "border" countries. Then a small increase. Since invasion significant increases in NATO troops and equipment in these areas and destined to stay for a long time
Undoubtedly will be used by the Russian propaganda machine. "We said NATO were looking to put more troops closer to our border. They have. NATO cannot be trusted. We can".
Same as they'll use the likes of Finland joining as NATO were always looking to expand.
Another one for the 'invite Russia for a cup of tea' folk:
Especially those glow-in-the-dark varieties.Russian tea is very nice actually - many different varieties
Hmm novichok, it's a Russian speciali-teaEspecially those glow-in-the-dark varieties.
Have you got some notes ?You’re thinking of voting brexit to punish big corporations. How did that work out by the way? I’ll check my notes. You crashed the pound inflating big corporations overseas profits sending their share values through the roof. No, that didn’t work. Maybe you voted brexit to empower the hard left. How did that work out? I’ll check my notes again. It says brexit converted them to hard right smashing the red wall and giving Boris Johnson a record majority so he could fuck you over with your blessing.
You’re not to good at this balance thing yourself.
A couple of weeks old but interesting article regarding masses of Russian tanks.
In my view:
1. There is of course the probability that Ukraine has just as many anti-tank weapons without putting their tanks in harms way.
2. The range/ effectiveness of the guns of ‘big tanks’ such as the Leopard may prove to be effective.
3. Russia is likely to use their tanks ‘dug in’ and used as artillery rather than field.
Make no mistake huge numbers of Russian tanks will terrorise Ukraine
There has been a general chortling in the commentariat over news that the Russians are now apparently transporting obsolete tanks to the Ukraine war zone.www.express.co.uk
Issue with the article is that frequently reported that Russia don't have the "bells and whistles" mentioned to upgrade these tanks or even repair damaged modern ones. The high Tec bits were made from parts from the likes of Germany and France. Sanctions cut that supply route.A couple of weeks old but interesting article regarding masses of Russian tanks.
In my view:
1. There is of course the probability that Ukraine has just as many anti-tank weapons without putting their tanks in harms way.
2. The range/ effectiveness of the guns of ‘big tanks’ such as the Leopard may prove to be effective.
3. Russia is likely to use their tanks ‘dug in’ and used as artillery rather than field.
Make no mistake huge numbers of Russian tanks will terrorise Ukraine
There has been a general chortling in the commentariat over news that the Russians are now apparently transporting obsolete tanks to the Ukraine war zone.www.express.co.uk
Obviously want to ensure all Ukrainian soldiers fight to the death. No point surrendering if you’re just trying to avoid certain death by committing to certain death. Not sure the Russians have thought this through. Not sure the Russians have thought any of it through though.Russians are now beheading Ukranian captives (on video).
Yet more reasons not to give them what they want.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?