They always contain facts. Ask a question and ill factually answer it. Here's a fact. We were charged the highest rent in league one. Here is another fact we were charged the highest rent in the championship. Oh one more fact all other clubs with council owned stadiums have a FAR better deal than us
Sadly the other fact is supporters like you seem to get off on these facts without realising the damage they have done.
And where the thrust of your stance falls over sir, is that you can't negotiate with yourself. Both parties have to sit at the table and be fair and reasonable, and BOTH parties have suggested they have been so and that the other party hasn't. But for some reason people seem intent on believing and listening to only one side.
That's as poor a conspiracy theory as me being TF.
Although it's conceivable, its highly improbable, and total speculation on your part!
So ultimately you have no proof. You are just taking ACL's word. Just like I am taking SISU's word but backing it up with this logic; Where would the sense be in moving home if they really were offered such an attractive deal?
And where the thrust of your stance falls over sir, is that you can't negotiate with yourself. Both parties have to sit at the table and be fair and reasonable, and BOTH parties have suggested they have been so and that the other party hasn't. But for some reason people seem intent on believing and listening to only one side.
You are dumb to take Sisu's word on anything. Again, prove to me where ACL have lied in the past? There are numerous lies in the open that Sisu have told so I know who I believe and it ain't your poxy hedge fund
Why on a football forum do you continue your stance of defending a landlord that even it admits has fleeced the club by reducing the rent by 66%. It's very hard to understand your obsession with them.
I can give a ray of hope!
We don't need new owners, we need new fans!
The ACL lovers on here are in the wrong place - this is a CCFC forum and all they do is support ACL!
Piss off and get your own forum! Call it NOPM!
imp:
You really are so one dimensional. We had the best facilities in league 1 by a country mile. We are not a league one club. We have ended up here through spectacular miss management and a real reluctance to invest in the team. When the plan of minimal investment for maximum return failed, then (and only then) was the spectre of financials raised in relation to the Ricoh, and battle commenced. You really have it the wrong way around, the damage was, and is still being done by a fundamental inability of the owners to understand the business that they are in.
I'm not obsessed with them. I think the rent was far too high but it's more down to Sisu than ACL as to why it's come down to this. After all we were never evicted were we. Why can't you admit that Sisu have made mistake after mistake and have completely mismanaged the club? Surely a man of your supposed superiority and intelligence can see that?
Why on a football forum do you continue your stance of defending a landlord that even it admits has fleeced the club by reducing the rent by 66%. It's very hard to understand your obsession with them.
You really are so one dimensional. We had the best facilities in league 1 by a country mile. We are not a league one club. We have ended up here through spectacular miss management and a real reluctance to invest in the team. When the plan of minimal investment for maximum return failed, then (and only then) was the spectre of financials raised in relation to the Ricoh, and battle commenced. You really have it the wrong way around, the damage was, and is still being done by a fundamental inability of the owners to understand the business that they are in.
Why on a football forum do you insist on supporting owners that are taking the club from its very city? That's the most pertinent question
You are dumb to take Sisu's word on anything. Again, prove to me where ACL have lied in the past? There are numerous lies in the open that Sisu have told so I know who I believe and it ain't your poxy hedge fund
Why on a football forum do you insist on supporting owners that are taking the club from its very city? That's the most pertinent question
We are all falling into the trap.
It's all a PR ploy, they are dividing the supporters and we are abusing each other not what's right.
Both SISU and ACL are in the wrong but only one is taking us away from the City.
When I was younger we used to sing "swop shop". - "tizwas" at each other in the west end, now we will be singing ACL - SISU at each other at Nuneaton.
Sorry but cannot understand the SISU argument, not on the side of anyone but COventry CIty, but that must be in COVENTRY.
Since we're all asking questions here..
Are you really that naive to believe that our situation now is solely the fault of SISU?
I can't quite get my head around this issue of blaming SISU for everything and yet knowing at the same time they are the owners of our football club who we should unconditionally be supporting? They could simply liquidate and go away leaving nothing, no Sky Blues, gone forever?
I bloody hate SISU as a company and the approach they take in matters but they are the owners of my football club and as such I will support them as much as I can to ensure the survival of my club and not pay so much homage to a council led ACL who mean nothing to us other than a very poor landlord who did indeed charge far too much rent for a number of years until questioned. Seriously?
Yes SISU have to take the club away but that is because they can't get a better deal with ACL to rent the Ricoh, it's a catch 22 situation..
I can't quite get my head around this issue of blaming SISU for everything and yet knowing at the same time they are the owners of our football club who we should unconditionally be supporting? They could simply liquidate and go away leaving nothing, no Sky Blues, gone forever?
I bloody hate SISU as a company and the approach they take in matters but they are the owners of my football club and as such I will support them as much as I can to ensure the survival of my club and not pay so much homage to a council led ACL who mean nothing to us other than a very poor landlord who did indeed charge far too much rent for a number of years until questioned. Seriously?
That's not what he is saying is it?
But only one side is removing the cub from the City, and lets face it if they do they will not come back.
Who ever is in the Wong only one side is hurting the fans.
Yes SISU have to take the club away but that is because they can't get a better deal with ACL to rent the Ricoh, it's a catch 22 situation..
No it's not but I wanted to ask that question just for MMM's opinion.. Is that a crime?
Who ever is in the Wong? Hello there from Tokyo :wave::wave::wave::wave::wave:
Agreed, but f they had done the deal months ago it would not be like this now. You not just stop stop paying rent because its wrong. It's so obvious that Fisher is trying to divide us and when w leave Coventry we will not be coming back
ACL have offered the absolute best they can without just giving the whole lot away.
I have read most of this thread and have not seen one post blaming Sisu for everything just that they are most to blameI can't quite get my head around this issue of blaming SISU for everything and yet knowing at the same time they are the owners of our football club who we should unconditionally be supporting? They could simply liquidate and go away leaving nothing, no Sky Blues, gone forever?
I bloody hate SISU as a company and the approach they take in matters but they are the owners of my football club and as such I will support them as much as I can to ensure the survival of my club and not pay so much homage to a council led ACL who mean nothing to us other than a very poor landlord who did indeed charge far too much rent for a number of years until questioned. Seriously?
Where's he going to go the Moon?!
Sorry if I don't take the words from someone who told us four weeks ago that he was sure we would be playing at Wasall this season :facepalm::facepalm:
ACL have offered the absolute best they can without just giving the whole lot away.
And why did that change?
Because there was an outcry from the Walsall fans.
The decision was not with the football fans but the stadium owner who had said yes
I want the same from Northampton now.
I couldn't answer that, yes a reduced rent was very kind (If not well overdue) although I am not privvy to the rest of the terms, so I can't answer that I am afraid.
Why on a football forum do you insist on supporting owners that are taking the club from its very city? That's the most pertinent question
That's not what he is saying is it?
But only one side is removing the cub from the City, and lets face it if they do they will not come back.
Who ever is in the Wong only one side is hurting the fans.
Good luck..
BREAKING: Coventry City will be playing their home games at Sixfields on a temporary basis. More on http://ntfc.co.uk shortly
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?