Wasps downward spiral... (37 Viewers)

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
For a Mayor who is struggling to get any recognition for the organization he runs, this could be the nail in the coffin for anyone from Coventry for the WMCA.
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
I guess this what happens when you force an organization onto people, then not giving the people a say on how they want to be governed.
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
Ann Lucas said in her reply to joining the WMCA, I believe, that Martin Reeves could not find any reason why we can't join the WMCA without a vote, or words to that general expression. I believe this is contrary to what Demsoc said about the process.

Well, I believe, I can't find a reason why we shouldn't give Martin Reeves due process and then sack him, or a change of Chief Executive because of this advice.
 
Last edited:

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I suspect we will be moving grounds again very soon
 

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
9
So what do we know

Interesting that acl companies are the only ones with charges from compass. Wasps holdings and finance don't.

Each of acl , acl 2006 wasps holdings and wasps finance secure the bond

Insolvency value of the lease would be well below current value.

Wasps finance the biggest creditor of acl. Acl owes wasps finance, then it is wasps finance that owes the bondholders.

Do we know where all the assets currently are. It is completely legal transfer assets around group companies especially if the security not affected

Accounts for ACL acl2006 & iec not filed and all could still be struck off but the Crown would seize any assets and any creditors would likely challenge the striking off- so not going to be allowed to happen

Default notice issued by bond trustees which is 30 day notice of action.

All assets are revalued in an insolvency and sold to the highest or preferred bidder. Liabilities are paid off at a discount.

Wasps not acl as far as has been said have applied for 13m assistance from WMCA.

These are serious financial people involved in this. They are not stupid. There is a plan.

Just thoughts it might not mean anything. Could easily be completely wrong I don't know.

If the Bonds are not paid it all collapses because of guarantees etc.

It would be interesting to see who is raisng the new finance - WF or WASPs Holdings or ACL. But if the suggestion is the £13m is not for the Bond Holders - what is this for?
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
Right now we don’t know what the £13m is for (or certainly I don’t). You throw the definition of ‘state aid‘ around to sensationalise it but have the rugby club received state aid or is that just your interpretation ?

Yes you could argue they are living beyond their means but you could say that about any outfit that has received funding for something unrelated to the playing side.

It’s interesting how many have now jumped on the cheating topic because of a reported £13m funding application but not before (if I’ve missed it before then I apologise)

You consider it ‘almost’ cheating…. the rights and wrongs of how the stadium business is run is unrelated to the players …. I accept I will be in the minority here with that view ….. so be it :)


State is government. The regional authority is local government. You can argue the semantics of that all you want.

I raised the issue about 'cheating' If people jump on the bandwagon that's up to them. Complain to them not me.

I know the game of rugby and how it works, you may not like that as you seem to take the view that us football fans don't understand your game, but accept it, and that I have a good idea on how Wasps are and will be viewed, certainly by other fans that I know.
 
State is government. The regional authority is local government. You can argue the semantics of that all you want.

I raised the issue about 'cheating' If people jump on the bandwagon that's up to them. Complain to them not me.

I know the game of rugby and how it works, you may not like that as you seem to take the view that us football fans don't understand your game, but accept it, and that I have a good idea on how Wasps are and will be viewed, certainly by other fans that I know.

State aid is not simply any government funding. Funding originating from a government entity is not always considered state aid. Reality is it doesn’t matter it’s £13m coming from somewhere which I have agreed is concerning.

I’m well aware you are familiar with rugby, I’ve seen your posts before and certainly wasn’t trying to suggest otherwise.

Im quite sure some of your Saints mates do view Wasps badly, nothing new there, that was the case long before the Coventry move.
 

mds

Well-Known Member
Did SISU play the long game perfectly, pushed and pushed with all the legal procedings ending up at the EU to then suddenly drop them using Warwick Uni to mask it.
They are a business built around money i wonder if they knew something, maybe inside info on the Wasps finances.

Whether they did or didnt IDGAF as long as Wasps end up in London where they started. Fuck em corrupt bunch of cnuts
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
Are all the Unite councillors still barred from the Union. I need something tonight to cheers me up.
 

Peter Billing Eyes

Well-Known Member
If the stadium does require 13 million in reparations (and the defects have been defined as structural), I wonder if that offers any leverage towards tearing up the rental agreement and moving again until the proverbial dust settles? It’s not something I would necessarily agree with but can see why this may be something to consider.
It would also be a tall ask finding a landlord with space for 12k> season ticket holders. Just putting this out there for debate….
 
Last edited:

Covkid1968#

Well-Known Member
If karma was working then the outcome of all of this would be CCFC owning the arena and CRFC being given a Premiership share.
[/QUOTE]
If Carlsberg did outcomes…….
 

Flying Fokker

Well-Known Member
Did SISU play the long game perfectly, pushed and pushed with all the legal procedings ending up at the EU to then suddenly drop them using Warwick Uni to mask it.
They are a business built around money i wonder if they knew something, maybe inside info on the Wasps finances.

Whether they did or didnt IDGAF as long as Wasps end up in London where they started. Fuck em corrupt bunch of cnuts
They are not that good. Maybe they learned something about trying to stress companies like ACL? A complete failure that put us into years of angst.
 

Flying Fokker

Well-Known Member
If the stadium does require 13 million in reparations (and the defects have been defined as structural), I wonder if that offers any leverage towards tearing up the rental agreement and moving again until the proverbial dust settles? It’s not something I would necessarily agree with but can see why this may be something to consider.
It would also be a tall ask finding a landlord with space for 12k> season ticket holders. Just putting this out there for debate….
We should never leave Coventry again. I’m also certain the fanbase would be decimated. A bit like last time really. I can’t see any reason to think 12k season ticket holders would follow.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
If the stadium does require 13 million in reparations (and the defects have been defined as structural), I wonder if that offers any leverage towards tearing up the rental agreement and moving again until the proverbial dust settles? It’s not something I would necessarily agree with but can see why this may be something to consider.
It would also be a tall ask finding a landlord with space for 12k> season ticket holders. Just putting this out there for debate….

I think if the stadium had serious structural issues, we wouldn't get a safety certificate for all or part of it (like Blues, perhaps). But I couldn't imagine it's that serious.

I also can't see any reason why CCFC would want to break their sub-lease at the moment.

Similarly, even if Wasps end up losing the head lease to either the council or the bondholders, in law I believe the sub-lease remains in force.

In any case, why would the new landlord want to kick out a paying tenant even if they could?

Personally, I don't see any great risk to CCFC from Wasps woes.

Maybe SISU get the 250-year head lease on the cheap as a result of all this, or maybe they don't, but I think we're safe with the remainder of the current sub-lease at least.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top