Supporters' group tells Coventry City FC owners to clarify stadium plans (23 Viewers)

Haigha

New Member
I'm comparing to the Ricoh when the club was in Northampton.

Interesting viewpoint, but I don't think you can't look at these things in isolation can you? When a football stadium was built in the north east of the city as little or no consideration was given to the economic vacuum that would be left around Highfield Road.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
I still believe that Sisu only moved us back because they got word of the Wasps deal.
It goes without saying that the negotiations had started with Wasps well before we came back.


The CET probably knew and sat on the story for the last 2 years..... you know to keep their pals at County Hall happy.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Doubt that would be the arrangement. If SISU were to pay for a huge redevelopment of the Butts they aren't going to hand it over to CRFC and then pay them rent to play there.

Personally I would set up a joint venture co set up in such a way that CCFC got the majority of the income, as they would presumably put in the majority of the capital, but ensured that CRFC were at worse on an equal footing as their current deal.

So its OK for a football team to screw over a Rugby team but not the other away around.
I don't believe CRFC are stupid enough to get into bed with Sisu.
At the end of the day the council have Screwed CCFC over, but don't kid yourself our owners don't give a fuck about CCFC ether!!
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
So its OK for a football team to screw over a Rugby team but not the other away around.

Certainly isn't, FWIW.

I know we're talking in IFs, but if CRFC didn't want the football club muscling in on their ground, it'd be time for another poorly attended protest I reckon ;)

At the end of the day the council have Screwed CCFC over, but don't kid yourself our owners don't give a fuck about CCFC ether!!

I think that's a given.
 

Nick

Administrator
So its OK for a football team to screw over a Rugby team but not the other away around.

Nope, far from it. If (not that I think it will) we did go to the Butts then it will certainly need to benefit them and help them. I wouldn't want CCFC muscling in and trying to take everything, it would need to benefit both but help both grow at the same time.
 

ceetee

Well-Known Member
I still believe that Sisu only moved us back because they got word of the Wasps deal.
It goes without saying that the negotiations had started with Wasps well before we came back.

Don't always agree with you but I do on this one. I would go further. There were two parties to the deal and I wonder if the then management of ACL were trying to put obstacles in the way of Wasps. After all the guy who did the deal didn't last very long afterwards
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Certainly isn't, FWIW.

I know we're talking in IFs, but if CRFC didn't want the football club muscling in on their ground, it'd be time for another poorly attended protest I reckon ;)

Those days are over our fans don't have the fight in them.
And I have used up all my Annual leave:)
 
Last edited:

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
If you dont like what he writes dont read it.

You seem happy to give your opinion, which is generally the opposite to Grendels, so why shouldnt he.

Never said he shouldn't?
Just said he and his mate Torch are boring and as you said that's just an opinion, oh and an observation.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/rugby/butts-park-arena-deal-secures-3067399

Unless anything has changed since this article then CRFC still have 120 years left on their lease, nothing can be done without their permission, and even if they wanted to join forces with SISU/CCFC in some kind of joint venture then I'd have thought the freeholder, CCC, would have to agree to someone else coming in on the lease.

Ok, so they are not going to live happily ever after. Pity, but I am going to bed anyway.....thought reality would click in at some time. Night all...
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
More like you are shown up as the fool you are time and time again. I thought that the franchise had cemented their place in the city? Instead they peddle lies to cover up their pathetic attendances.

:laugh: Lies/fool:laugh:
:laugh:
That coming from the believer:laugh:
 
The CET probably knew and sat on the story for the last 2 years..... you know to keep their pals at County Hall happy.

They definitely knew about the Wasps deal well before they ran that story. They've been in bed with the council for years.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
Nope, far from it. If (not that I think it will) we did go to the Butts then it will certainly need to benefit them and help them. I wouldn't want CCFC muscling in and trying to take everything, it would need to benefit both but help both grow at the same time.

From experience I think they can trust Sisu ?
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
So its OK for a football team to screw over a Rugby team but not the other away around.
I don't believe CRFC are stupid enough to get into bed with Sisu.
At the end of the day the council have Screwed CCFC over, but don't kid yourself our owners don't give a fuck about CCFC ether!!

Its also OK for a football team to look after a Rugby team for mutual benefit but not the other way round.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Don't always agree with you but I do on this one. I would go further. There were two parties to the deal and I wonder if the then management of ACL were trying to put obstacles in the way of Wasps. After all the guy who did the deal didn't last very long afterwards

Don't think so, the board of directors was composed of 2 CCC officers, 2 Higgs Charity representatives and one independent. If anything the Higgs reps. might have resisted the poor price till they came to a point of acceptance, but once CCC decided to sell I don't think they had much choice and with all the legal stuff going on I don't blame them for getting out.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Do you expect us to be benefiting from CRFC games if we own the Butts?

My starting point would be CRFC gets full benefit of any rugby events, CCFC gets any benefit of any football events. The rest then gets split on some basis but if we're assuming CCFC / SISU are in someway funding the redevelopment then they would get most of the benefit.

For me the key point is CRFC are no worse off. If they can make a bit more while we also prosper then everyone is happy.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
My starting point would be CRFC gets full benefit of any rugby events, CCFC gets any benefit of any football events. The rest then gets split on some basis but if we're assuming CCFC / SISU are in someway funding the redevelopment then they would get most of the benefit.

For me the key point is CRFC are no worse off. If they can make a bit more while we also prosper then everyone is happy.

Do we know whether or not CRFC are worse off since Wasps arrived?
 

Nick

Administrator
Do you expect us to be benefiting from CRFC games if we own the Butts?
I would expect both teams to be benefiting. Not just one way. I wouldn't expect ccfc to go in and take any crfc revenue and name them worse off, I'd want them to be better off to make it worthwhile.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Do we know whether or not CRFC are worse off since Wasps arrived?

Short term probably not. Long term... absolutely.

(unless, of course, there's an ideal world scenario for them where Wasps raise interest in Rugby in the city in general, before bogging off elsewhere/going pop)

(AND ANOTHER THING, still wondering why an owner desperate to bring top flight Rugby to the city of Coventry didn't buy the club already in the city, and give them the funds to get there. Not *that* many divisions they'd have to climb, after all.)
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
My starting point would be CRFC gets full benefit of any rugby events, CCFC gets any benefit of any football events. The rest then gets split on some basis but if we're assuming CCFC / SISU are in someway funding the redevelopment then they would get most of the benefit.

For me the key point is CRFC are no worse off. If they can make a bit more while we also prosper then everyone is happy.

What if CRFC see it as they're providing the land/lease and no doubt there will be some sort of grant available to them from the EU, RFU or maybe from there own backers for the redevelopment. How do you know that we won't be their tenants and us being their tenant is the motivation they need to redevelop the Butts? For all you know our situation could be worse than the one we're currently in as we're still renting, have limited access to revenue streams and have limited ourselves to a ceiling of 15k a game in ticket revenue.
 
Last edited:

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
What if CRFC see it as they're providing the land/lease and no doubt there will be some sort of grant available to them from the EU, RFU or maybe from there own backers for the redevelopment. How do you know that we won't be their tenants and us being their tenant is the motivation they need to redevelop the Butts? For all you know our situation could be worse than the one we're currently in as we're still renting, have limited access to revenue streams and have limited ourselves to a ceiling of 15k a game in ticket revenue.

Why would the EU grant money to Cov RFC to redevelop their ground? Why would the RFU?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
I seem to remember that the Ricoh was part funded with grants from everyman and their dog. Why wouldn't similar grants be available for the redevelopment of the Butts?

The Ricoh had £4.4m from European Regional Development Fund and £4.8m from Advantage West Midlands.

To get an ERDF grant the Butts redevelopment would have to qualify as sustainable urban development.

AWM is a lot more vauge, you could get pretty much anything to meet their requirements so I guess its more down to if they want to support your project or not.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
The Ricoh had £4.4m from European Regional Development Fund and £4.8m from Advantage West Midlands.

To get an ERDF grant the Butts redevelopment would have to qualify as sustainable urban development.

AWM is a lot more vauge, you could get pretty much anything to meet their requirements so I guess its more down to if they want to support your project or not.

So it is possible then that the Butts will receive grants for development. As I also said how do you know that it won't be CRFC doing the development and we'll be their tenants? It is possible. Might also explain the lack of ambition where capacity is concerned, CRFC don't need a 25k stadium and in all likelihood never will. We possibly might on the other hand.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
I seem to remember that the Ricoh was part funded with grants from everyman and their dog. Why wouldn't similar grants be available for the redevelopment of the Butts?

It was a derelict brownfield site though and the applicant was the Regional Development Agency who managed ERDF at that time.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
So it is possible then that the Butts will receive grants for development. As I also said how do you know that it won't be CRFC doing the development and we'll be their tenants? It is possible. Might also explain the lack of ambition where capacity is concerned, CRFC don't need a 25k stadium and in all likelihood never will. We possibly might on the other hand.

Its possible of course, we don't know any of the details so pretty much anything is possible. For all we know it could be a 80K underground stadium :p
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
The Ricoh had £4.4m from European Regional Development Fund and £4.8m from Advantage West Midlands.

To get an ERDF grant the Butts redevelopment would have to qualify as sustainable urban development.

AWM is a lot more vauge, you could get pretty much anything to meet their requirements so I guess its more down to if they want to support your project or not.

Not sure about that chief, AWM and the other Regional Development Agencies were abolished in 2010. The local enterprise partnership may be able to draw down European money, but I doubt redeveloping an existing stadium would qualify.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Not sure about that chief, AWM and the other Regional Development Agencies were abolished in 2010. The local enterprise partnership may be able to draw down European money, but I doubt redeveloping an existing stadium would qualify.

Probably be quite tricky to get a grant from them if they don't exist anymore :laugh: did anything similar replace it or do it just get cut?

EDRF has state aid implications, can't be used to distort the market so might be a non starter even if stadium redevelopment did meet their criteria.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Its possible of course, we don't know any of the details so pretty much anything is possible. For all we know it could be a 80K underground stadium :p

Indeed. And as the article that the thread is supposed to be about is the Trust asking for clarity on just that. Shame it got twisted into another Wasps thread.

Only two clubs should have been discussed on this thread and that's CCFC and CRFC. That lasted as far as post #2.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top