Juergen Turdbull (19 Viewers)

mark82

Super Moderator
Lol football fans.dont half.talk.some shit ehen a player leaves

He was awful for us last year. I actually think there is a player in there but his attitude this summer probably shows a lot of why that player isn't on show very often.
 

Gaz

Well-Known Member
Glad he is gone.
I haven't got time for players that don't want to be here.
I hope we don't see him in a city shirt again.

I can understand not wanting to play in league 2, but he was part of the team that put us there so should have gave it his best to get us back into league 1.

Overall strange it's a loan.
Can only suggest that a fee would have been payable to us with a perm move.
 

steve82

Well-Known Member
The irony, committed!
Will you join him him? What flat on his arse? It's where he spent most his CCFC career.

d590c67d5eafe15c10d6a88a2b65f183.png
 

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
If Partick are fully paying his wages it's really not such a bad move. Still a year left on his contract after this loan, a year in Glasgow might sort his head out, we'll be back in L1 and can decide if he's worth keeping on or not for his final year. Also, if he does well there, we may be in with a shout of selling him to Celtic for a few million. Because after all..
SPL is IMHO at least mid to top end Championship or lower EPL.

giphy.gif
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
If Partick are fully paying his wages it's really not such a bad move. Still a year left on his contract after this loan, a year in Glasgow might sort his head out, we'll be back in L1 and can decide if he's worth keeping on or not for his final year. Also, if he does well there, we may be in with a shout of selling him to Celtic for a few million. Because after all..


giphy.gif
Celtic just smashed Sunderland 5-0. They won't win many games this season by that amount.

How many that slag Scottish football off have actually watched it?
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
Celtic just smashed Sunderland 5-0. They won't win many games this season by that amount.

How many that slag Scottish football off have actually watched it?
That was just a friendly, Rangers lost in a competitive fixture over 2 legs to team that finished 4th in the Luxembourg league.

Furthermore, according to UEFA coefficient rankings, The SPL is worse than the Kazakh, Belarusian, Azerbaijani and Cypriot leagues, among others.
 

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
Celtic just smashed Sunderland 5-0. They won't win many games this season by that amount.

How many that slag Scottish football off have actually watched it?
Me. It was televised out here last couple of years because they didn't have PL rights in Czech. Celtic scored 4 goals or more in over a 3rd of their SP games last year. That's right, 37% of their games they scored at least 4 goals in, averaging 2.8 goals per game over the season.
Are you really quoting a friendly as evidence? Rangers lost to a mid table Luxembourg team and Celtic couldn't score at home against Rosenborg. Overall, it is dire.
 

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
Anyway, Turnbull reminds me of a pedigree puppy. Looked cute and the theory was great but after a year of shitting in his own bed it doesn't seem like such a clever decision to get him. Let's lend him to someone else to see if they can potty train him and maybe he won't be so much hard work in a year.
 

mark82

Super Moderator
Celtic just smashed Sunderland 5-0. They won't win many games this season by that amount.

How many that slag Scottish football off have actually watched it?

Celtic are probably top end Championship, lower EPL with their current squad (obviously their potential is huge if they played in English leagues).
Aberdeen & Rangers are probably low end Championship, high League 1 at their current level.
The rest of the league is probably maximum mid league 1 level, minimum mid league 2. You only have to look at the amount of average players that moved to the SPL from our squad that was relegated from league 1. They are all players we have probably replaced with better quality.
 

mark82

Super Moderator
Good fickin riddance.

Who on here will be welcoming Turncoat back at the end of next season when will be in League one and a level with which Turnballs finds adequate enough to play for us.

I hope he never plays for us again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

He won't. If he'd stayed wouldn't have been guaranteed first team this year. If we get promoted, unless he has an outstanding season this year, I don't think he would make the team. If he did have a good season suspect he'd be sold anyway.
 

Warwickhunt

Well-Known Member
As long as his wages have been freed up is the main thing as that will allow MR to get another striker in
 

AlansEyes

Well-Known Member
The Turnbull and Reid sagas prove one thing at least - that I know absolutely eff all. Was sure that both were excellent signings this time last year. By the looks of it SISU put wage reductions into their contracts in case of relegation, so fair play for that as I could imagine these two would have happily sat on their top-earner L1 contracts while giving half-arsed performances in L2.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
yeah gotta believe wage reductions included too, why else join partick thistle???? dont get it

need to get reid and g thomas sorted asap,and replace if needed by september 1st!
 

ccfc_Tom

Well-Known Member
Robins has said turnbull going has freed up 'significant' wages so they must be paying all of them and god knows what we were paying him in relation to everyone else
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Robins has said turnbull going has freed up 'significant' wages so they must be paying all of them and god knows what we were paying him in relation to everyone else

people ar emaoning on social media that sisu are paying alot of his wages still

but then they say they dont fund the team lol

either way if wage budget is freed up thats good, now lets get 1 cb,1amc/winger in asap
 

Nick

Administrator
Robins has said turnbull going has freed up 'significant' wages so they must be paying all of them and god knows what we were paying him in relation to everyone else

Which article was that in? Just to see Robins comments about it :)
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I’d say Gary Borrowdale, but we made a profit on him. Purely for the figures involv d maybe Hughes?
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
I would have said Gary Collier, 325,000 in about 1979 and played 2 games....however 7 months later we sold him for 365,000 to some American team, so perhaps not such a disaster after all.

But for me Freddie Eastwood.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top