Fair enough and I read your points well but with respect you didn’t directly address my points as my have validity to. It’s up for debate sure but the referendum was all about an individual choice no matter how poor or wealthy that person or who didn’t like the decision or not.
We (hopefully) won’t carry on paying money to an organization that haven’t had their accounts signed off for 20 years. That’s not indepedence also. It’s also not free trade like some claim on here. We pay 10b a year net and they sell us a trade deficit of circa 80b a year. Go figure.
Fact check on 80bn trade deficit:
The UK’s trade deficit with the EU
We gain more for our 10bn than it costs. Largely through services. We also have full employment and are still a major economy as a result of membership.
Are you claiming the referendum was people deciding based on economic facts and therefore with the knowledge that poor people could actually make themselves poorer through leaving? If the poor or „just about managing“ voted knowingly against their own interests, it is a very sad situation.
I cannot see how the poor will be better off outside the EU. I don’t get the suppressed wages arguments caused by cheap EU labour because we have full employment. If we had mass unemployment and cheap foreign labour was coming in, I could understand it. Wages are being outpaced by inflation. Unusual in times of full employment.
Has it got more to do with wage capping than the EU? Don’t know, but as I say, I don’t get the apparent failure of supply and demand in the labour market. With almost full employment there must be people short of staff who would pay UK workers more because they need staff. Maybe you could explain?