The EU: In, out, shake it all about.... (51 Viewers)

As of right now, how are thinking of voting? In or out

  • Remain

    Votes: 23 37.1%
  • Leave

    Votes: 35 56.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Not registered or not intention to vote

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .

Astute

Well-Known Member
Not all of the money disappears and it goes to a variety of different schemes, most are not mafia contracts either.
So do you agree that they should be more careful where the money goes as the frauds have cost many billions and happen each year?
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
So are you saying that the EU is best keep putting money into road building schemes where most of it ends up in the hands of the mafia as it will help people living in those areas?

You just said you shouldn’t believe headlines. You are now making your own up.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
You just said you shouldn’t believe headlines. You are now making your own up.
Why not ask SB.

We went through it in detail. But it didn't look good on the EU so you have forgotten about it. How unusual.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
So do you agree that they should be more careful where the money goes as the frauds have cost many billions and happen each year?

The mafia is so much ingrained within society there that it's not a case of 'just being careful'. A lot of Sicilian friends I have from my time living down there claim that the government is the mafia itself. It's partly why the likes of 5Star have done so well there as they are a reaction to it, they're just incompetent when they get any kind of power.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
The mafia is so much ingrained within society there that it's not a case of 'just being careful'. A lot of Sicilian friends I have from my time living down there claim that the government is the mafia itself. It's partly why the likes of 5Star have done so well there as they are a reaction to it, they're just incompetent when they get any kind of power.
And as you know we agree on this.

We don't know fully what goes on. But fraud is rife in Italy. And it will continue until something is done about it by the EU.

I await Mart like last time to come out qith a small amount of fraud from the UK that means it is OK for it to continue happening in Italy. But it should all be looked into as much as possible.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
You just said you shouldn’t believe headlines. You are now making your own up.
Wassup Mart?

So what headlines have I made up?

Would you like more?

Why did you agree with him SB?
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
And as you know we agree on this.

We don't know fully what goes on. But fraud is rife in Italy. And it will continue until something is done about it by the EU.

I await Mart like last time to come out qith a small amount of fraud from the UK that means it is OK for it to continue happening in Italy. But it should all be looked into as much as possible.

So now you're happy for the EU to interfere in domestic politics and use EU funds to get rid of the mafia? Wow!
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
So now you're happy for the EU to interfere in domestic politics and use EU funds to get rid of the mafia? Wow!
Oh how you like to twist things.

So where did I say that? I didn't. But you would love me to defend something that I haven't said to change the subject.

Domestic politics? Giving billions away and knowing a large amount is going on fraud and they should do nothing? How about releasing the money a bit at a time and only when you see the work happening?

This is the problem with the EU. They don't spend money on counter fraud. And people that defend them don't have a problem with it. But it is a massive problem to the same people if just a fraction of this happens in the UK.

So are you saying nothing should change with the way money is distributed in Italy when you bring up the chance of even the government being involved in the fraud?
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
And because you can name just a few out of the vast majority you must be right?

I assume I am right as the said people are already asking for a continuation of sisbsidies. It would be unusual for only a few to want to keep money. The point is that these people slag the EU on the one hand for giving money to projects, but have made it clear that they want their hand outs to continue after Brexit. Only difference being that the U.K. pays direct into their pockets. No difference between remain and leave on this point. So what are we apparently gaining in that case?
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Wassup Mart?

So what headlines have I made up?

Would you like more?

Why did you agree with him SB?

Dramatic statements that when analysed have a basis of truth, but are exaggerated to make a point. You say that over half the money goes to rich landowners. Not quite. There are conditions attached, but it is true there are people just riding the gravy train. Some of these people are already lobbying for the U.K. to continue the payouts after Brexit, which means leaving the EU doesn’t necessarily end the gravy train.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
I assume I am right as the said people are already asking for a continuation of sisbsidies. It would be unusual for only a few to want to keep money. The point is that these people slag the EU on the one hand for giving money to projects, but have made it clear that they want their hand outs to continue after Brexit. Only difference being that the U.K. pays direct into their pockets. No difference between remain and leave on this point. So what are we apparently gaining in that case?
The UK does not pay direct into these accounts. They follow EU laws and rules.

The money comes from one of two pots funded by those countries like us that fund the EU. The pots total about 67% of the whole EU budget. And if they are registered as being British it is counted as a rebate against what we pay into the EU each year. Yet the tax man sees nothing of it.

But you already know this.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Dramatic statements that when analysed have a basis of truth, but are exaggerated to make a point. You say that over half the money goes to rich landowners. Not quite. There are conditions attached, but it is true there are people just riding the gravy train. Some of these people are already lobbying for the U.K. to continue the payouts after Brexit, which means leaving the EU doesn’t necessarily end the gravy train.
So which part is false?

And as you say......link?
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Oh how you like to twist things.

So where did I say that? I didn't. But you would love me to defend something that I haven't said to change the subject.

Domestic politics? Giving billions away and knowing a large amount is going on fraud and they should do nothing? How about releasing the money a bit at a time and only when you see the work happening?

This is the problem with the EU. They don't spend money on counter fraud. And people that defend them don't have a problem with it. But it is a massive problem to the same people if just a fraction of this happens in the UK.

So are you saying nothing should change with the way money is distributed in Italy when you bring up the chance of even the government being involved in the fraud?
The UK does not pay direct into these accounts. They follow EU laws and rules.

The money comes from one of two pots funded by those countries like us that fund the EU. The pots total about 67% of the whole EU budget. And if they are registered as being British it is counted as a rebate against what we pay into the EU each year. Yet the tax man sees nothing of it.

But you already know this.

Yes. I have not said that the UK pays direct.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Yes. I have not said that the UK pays direct.

The point is that these people slag the EU on the one hand for giving money to projects, but have made it clear that they want their hand outs to continue after Brexit. Only difference being that the U.K. pays direct into their pockets.

You were saying......

So how about backing up you saying I had twisted the truth.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
You were saying......

So how about backing up you saying I had twisted the truth.

In the future.... they want to continue hand outs after Brexit... then they will be direct.., I said „ only difference „ meaning difference to getting payouts from the EU..
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
In the future.... they want to continue hand outs after Brexit... then they will be direct.., I said „ only difference „ meaning difference to getting payouts from the EU..
That makes less sense than before
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
They landowners, even those supporting Brexit, are happy enough to continue the system after Brexit with direct payments from them UK.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
They landowners, even those supporting Brexit, are happy enough to continue the system after Brexit with direct payments from them UK.
Link?

Might have a clue what you allege then.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Link?

Might have a clue what you allege then.

E.g. Dyson:
EU farming subsidies: One in five biggest recipients are billionaires and millionaires on the UK rich list
Sir James Dyson's farming business was the biggest private recipient of EU basic payments in the UK in 2016, receiving £1.6 million, Greenpeace says
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Link?

Might have a clue what you allege then.

This racket is perhaps the strongest of all arguments for leaving the European Union, but the Brexiters’ silence resounds. Among the 13 Conservative MPs who signed an open letter last week undertaking not to cut subsidies for owning or leasing land if Britain leaves the union was Iain Duncan Smith. His wife’s family’s estate, on which he lives, receives £150,000 a year of your money, handed to them by the EU.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Link?

Might have a clue what you allege then.

„The minister responsible for cutting income support for the poor, Iain Duncan Smith, lives on an estate owned by his wife's family. During the last 10 years it has received €1.5m in income support from taxpayers. How much more obvious do these double standards have to be before we begin to notice?“

And he has already joint signed a letter to the government insisting that these subsidies continue after Brexit. Britain was one country against reforming the COP. I wonder why?
 

martcov

Well-Known Member

And there are people on here who maintain that both sides have lied equally. Experts can make mistaken predictions on not yet known events, remain got some things wrong and some things can still happen, but the government had access to the rules and regulations of the EU and the EU had laid out the facts. To try and deny these known facts is called lying. It is amazing that despite the results listed in your post, people are still in denial and claim they have not been conned.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Are you still seeing Nazi's on every street corner Mart ??

Gotcha! One less. Arrested in Budapest. Made a living spreading fear, slagging Merkel and other politicians and the press, slagging foreigners and praising the third Reich. Through Facebook and Internet and then selling frightened and angry people weapons and pepper spray etc.. Had over 2 million likes for his lies and lots of people received death threats because of the them. Some people on here think that these Facebook posts have little influence. Hope he gets a long sentence.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Well, that went well then. If this has set the precedent for trade negotiations with not just the EU but the rest of the world (and let’s face it, odds are it has) I wonder how many brexit voters will be big enough to admit that they got it wrong?

I can answer that. No.

What will happen is that they will blame the remainers for not being patriotic. They will malign them with insults such as „crank“, „stupid“, „slobbering“ and hope that the constant insults stop them saying „I told you so“.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
E.g. Dyson:
EU farming subsidies: One in five biggest recipients are billionaires and millionaires on the UK rich list
Sir James Dyson's farming business was the biggest private recipient of EU basic payments in the UK in 2016, receiving £1.6 million, Greenpeace says
Which is exactly what I have been saying. And you have tried to disagree.

So do you think it is a good way for the EU to waste tax payers money?

And strangely enough he wants out of the EU. He certainly doesn't need the EU money.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top