Poll: How long will Trump be President? (9 Viewers)

Poll: How long will Trump be President?

  • Up to 1 year (inaugurated 20 Jan 2017)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Up to 2 years

    Votes: 6 40.0%
  • Up to 3 years

    Votes: 2 13.3%
  • Up to 4 years (fulll term)

    Votes: 4 26.7%
  • 2 full terms (8 years)

    Votes: 3 20.0%

  • Total voters
    15
  • Poll closed .

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Can’t be right. We’re at the front of the queue. Aren’t we?

Subscribe to read

“You can’t just scratch out ‘EU’ and put in ‘UK’.”

Who knows KoK could turn out to be right, Trump is such a wild card he's impossible to predict. But looking at the blue skies negotiations, looking at the tariffs he's throwing around like confetti, it doesn't fill me with confidence.
 

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
Who knows KoK could turn out to be right, Trump is such a wild card he's impossible to predict. But looking at the blue skies negotiations, looking at the tariffs he's throwing around like confetti, it doesn't fill me with confidence.

Trump was voted on an American first ticket. He is delivering bigtime in America and he is set to win in 2020 as it stands.

Tarrifs are low in comparison to before. But trump wants a fair system not 10% one way and 2.5% the other way. I think that’s fair.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Trump was voted on an American first ticket. He is delivering bigtime in America and he is set to win in 2020 as it stands.

Tarrifs are low in comparison to before. But trump wants a fair system not 10% one way and 2.5% the other way. I think that’s fair.

they want a system that's weighed in Americas favour. That's just not Trump, that's how they do business. I'm not saying they're wrong, I'm saying it means they won't do us any favours unless they get something in return, we all know what that something is.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Look the guys attitudes are odious but he's cracking eggs .
The worst anyone can do when dealing with the twat is react.
On the surface he's got the ball rolling over NK credit for that.
We're headed backwards though under his model .
Despite the Crash (Banking Created),there is less order /certainty /security in the system.
More fluctuation will result, we should know by now who benefits from that.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
So Cambridge Analytica, anything worthwhile to the Mueller investigation here ?

McCabe took notes on his meetings with Trump and he is now unemployed without a pension. Could be interesting. Stormy‘s lawyer said 6 other women have come forward. Trump is reckless. Question is if it costs him his presidency before he wrecks the world economy?
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
So??
The split is even on Military action in Syria both around 35% for and against
Should it involve engaging Russia it swings to 28%-48% against.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
Sometimes I wish I lived in a little island in the middle of nowhere blissfully unaware and out of the way of these idiots - only the fact that I'd miss the City games that would keep me here !!
 

BackRoomRummermill

Well-Known Member
Sometimes I wish I lived in a little island in the middle of nowhere blissfully unaware and out of the way of these idiots - only the fact that I'd miss the City games that would keep me here !!

Well I live in the Scottish Highlands well off any damage on Nuke map and I have i follow so not worried .
 

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
Again we are not being shown the proof, did Assad really gas his own people? Why? Why now?

I’m not convinced by a long chalk but if true I think we need to act and I agree with trump. Send a message. Be clear and straight forward. And I’m normally against military action.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Again we are not being shown the proof, did Assad really gas his own people? Why? Why now?

I’m not convinced by a long chalk but if true I think we need to act and I agree with trump. Send a message. Be clear and straight forward. And I’m normally against military action.
Proof appears to be the one thing our government finds difficult to provide. Once it's been established definitively it makes the justification for military action more reasoned.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Again we are not being shown the proof, did Assad really gas his own people? Why? Why now?

I’m not convinced by a long chalk but if true I think we need to act and I agree with trump. Send a message. Be clear and straight forward. And I’m normally against military action.


One problem is that Trump is not clear and straight forward. He watches something on Fox and sends off an angry tweet. Last week at a rally he said we’ve ( meaning USA ) beaten ISIS and will leaving Syria very shortly. Assad thinks thank god for that and throws barrels of nerve gas to take care of a stubborn pocket of resistance. Then Trump puts the Tele on, sees what‘s happened and tweets we’re going to blow something in Syria up. Maybe there will be conflict of some sort with Russia starting in Syria.

You agree with Trump. Which version? Last week‘s, today’s or tomorrow‘s Trump?

I just want him impeached, or if we make it to the mid terms, the republicans to suffer the worst mid terms in history. One semi literate idiot less on the world stage would certainly help.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
One problem is that Trump is not clear and straight forward. He watches something on Fox and sends off an angry tweet. Last week at a rally he said we’ve ( meaning USA ) beaten ISIS and will leaving Syria very shortly. Assad thinks thank god for that and throws barrels of nerve gas to take care of a stubborn pocket of resistance. Then Trump puts the Tele on, sees what‘s happened and tweets we’re going to blow something in Syria up. Maybe there will be conflict of some sort with Russia starting in Syria.

You agree with Trump. Which version? Last week‘s, today’s or tomorrow‘s Trump?

I just want him impeached, or if we make it to the mid terms, the republicans to suffer the worst mid terms in history. One semi literate idiot less on the world stage would certainly help.
Only yesterday he posted these tweets within an hour of each other.

Screenshot_2018-04-12-07-38-55.png
Screenshot_2018-04-12-07-39-25.png
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Only yesterday he posted these tweets within an hour of each other.

View attachment 9429
View attachment 9430

Followed by a clear explanation from Huckerberry Sanders:

„Sanders indicated to reporters that missile strikes were not his only option.
"That's certainly one option, but that doesn't mean it's the only option or the only thing that the President may or may not do," she said.“

Clear as mud and leaving all options open to the President who had said during his campaign that he wouldn’t be as stupid as to tell the enemy what his actions would be. Although he just did in his first tweet.

Let’s see how he feels when he has watched Fox News today.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Followed by a clear explanation from Huckerberry Sanders:

„Sanders indicated to reporters that missile strikes were not his only option.
"That's certainly one option, but that doesn't mean it's the only option or the only thing that the President may or may not do," she said.“

Clear as mud and leaving all options open to the President who had said during his campaign that he wouldn’t be as stupid as to tell the enemy what his actions would be. Although he just did in his first tweet.

Let’s see how he feels when he has watched Fox News today.

Nice to see Mr Macron cosying up to Mr Trump - who’d have thought it
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Nice to see Mr Macron cosying up to Mr Trump - who’d have thought it
Arguably Macron is more radically distant from the French political tradition, than Trump is from the American!
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member

henry the wasp

Well-Known Member
It's a docu drama set in Sheffield about the aftermath of a nuclear war. I don't know anything about a development plan . Frightened the life out of me as a 14 year old kid.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Nice to see Mr Macron cosying up to Mr Trump - who’d have thought it

is he? Trump has now said he didn't say when or even if the missiles are going to be fired. Who knows what is going to happen. The US - Russian crisis line about the Middle East is open and active. Depends what's on Fox News.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Arguably Macron is more radically distant from the French political tradition, than Trump is from the American!

I thought he wanted to make the French Language more important again and lead the EU Reform with Merkel in the absence of the UK, which would suggest a more distant approach to the UK and a strengthening of French influence in Europe and the rest of the world whilst Britain try to find it's place in the world having left the EU.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
is he? Trump has now said he didn't say when or even if the missiles are going to be fired. Who knows what is going to happen. The US - Russian crisis line about the Middle East is open and active. Depends what's on Fox News.

Nope he’s just announced he has clear evidence of the chemical attack and is pushing for military action.

Odd that. Mr Corbyn just denounced violence on both sides (well I never) and seemed taken in by the Russian claim no chemical attack took place. Nothing changes there.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I thought he wanted to make the French Language more important again and lead the EU Reform with Merkel in the absence of the UK, which would suggest a more distant approach to the UK and a strengthening of French influence in Europe and the rest of the world whilst Britain try to find it's place in the world having left the EU.

Lol he seems pretty keen on getting May involved in military action and was one of the first to stand up against Putin in the wake of Salisbury
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
I'd concur with a fair chunk of his views, most definitely regarding his assessment around Trumps tweeting and other techniques.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Nope he’s just announced he has clear evidence of the chemical attack and is pushing for military action.

Odd that. Mr Corbyn just denounced violence on both sides (well I never) and seemed taken in by the Russian claim no chemical attack took place. Nothing changes there.

so should he of just denounced Hezbollah or Al Quaeda?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Anyone remember the days when Trump was telling everyone that he could deal with Putin, as if it was a failure of previous regimes to not get close to him. How times change. In a short period of time too. It was only last November when Trump was believing the denials of Putin. Mind you that was a denial about meddling in the American election. Trumps ego alone won’t allow him to admit that his election win was anything other than his own work. By the time Trumps presidency is up Putin would have lied about everything...

... other than meddling in the USA election. Definitely telling the truth on that...

... but nothing else.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
so should he of just denounced Hezbollah or Al Quaeda?

I’m talking about Syria when he refused to condemn a chemical attack on young children. The whole world condemns it but Corbyn. That’s fine but in the end if you vote for Corbyn look at the screaming children subjected to chemical warfare and consider the Corbyn utters not one word of condemnation - not a word.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
I’m talking about Syria when he refused to condemn a chemical attack on young children. The whole world condemns it but Corbyn. That’s fine but in the end if you vote for Corbyn look at the screaming children subjected to chemical warfare and consider the Corbyn utters not one word of condemnation - not a word.

i was talking about Syria, we could potentially be going into war on the side of Al Qaeda affiliates, do you want Corbyn to defend them?

i could spend all night on here listing attacks that have happened which haven't been condemned by our government and in some cases clearly facilitated by them, (Yemen springs to mind), So you statement is fairly ridiculous.

I don't know the answer to what's going on in Syria, but I do know that we have affected regime change and backed dubious groups in the Middle East with ever increasing disastrous results, going right back to the 50s when Iran had a fairly rational and democratically elected leader who we helped depose in order to install an Islamist because he wanted to nationalise Irans oil supplies for the Iranian people.

So I'm always concerned when we get involved in situations like this because invariably we somehow manage to make things even worse than they were before.
Also remember that as far back as 2013 Corbyn urged the Government to stop Russia from being allowed to attend arms trade fair on UK soil and purchasing weapons, but I'm sure you will somehow find a way to condemn him for that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top