The EU: In, out, shake it all about.... (66 Viewers)

As of right now, how are thinking of voting? In or out

  • Remain

    Votes: 23 37.1%
  • Leave

    Votes: 35 56.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Not registered or not intention to vote

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I’ve not had chance to watch the full speech yet but having just read the coverage on the BBC website I feel I probably owe Astute, SB Bazza and a few others an apology.

It’s not fair to expect you to understand and explain the reasons beyond the empty rhetoric of why Brexit will be great. The PM doesn’t seem to be able to do it either. If the BBC’s coverage is anything to go by she’s well and truly in the “brexit will be great because it just will” camp. It’s not fair to expect joe average on a football forum to do better and for that I wholeheartedly apologise.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Laughable - Mart himself could book a meeting room somewhere near the centre if Birmingham, invite a few people...including the media & say whatever he likes.

I doubt the tory party would invite Mart or Farage to present at any official gathering. But then in MartWorld as we know anything is possible!

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Leave means leave in Birmingham, or nearby, during the conference- Farage not invited by the Conservatives, but there to get in on the act. Gave a speech and press interviews.

From his Twitter:

„Join us in Birmingham on the weekend of Conservative Party Conference. It could get interesting!“

So what are you on about?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Leave means leave in Birmingham, or nearby, during the conference- Farage not invited by the Conservatives, but there to get in on the act. Gave a speech and press interviews.

From his Twitter:

„Join us in Birmingham on the weekend of Conservative Party Conference. It could get interesting!“

So what are you on about?

Didn’t Ferage and Davis share a stage at a brexit rally the other week?
 

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
I’ve not had chance to watch the full speech yet but having just read the coverage on the BBC website I feel I probably owe Astute, SB Bazza and a few others an apology.

It’s not fair to expect you to understand and explain the reasons beyond the empty rhetoric of why Brexit will be great. The PM doesn’t seem to be able to do it either. If the BBC’s coverage is anything to go by she’s well and truly in the “brexit will be great because it just will” camp. It’s not fair to expect joe average on a football forum to do better and for that I wholeheartedly apologise.
Well...it is alright for those above average supercilious jerk-offs like yourself. Some of us have real problems grasping simple concepts. Such as...the majority voted to leave...or...Just In Time...or I sympathise with party X's agenda, but I will vote for party Y who I cannot identify with whatsoever. I have REAL trouble with that kind of thing - unlike yourself.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Bollocks as usual.

You have lived in Germany most of your life. You don't have the reality of living in the UK. You say we don't have any unemployed. You say that record amounts of people coming to live here only brings good.

I say we need to catch up with housing.es for the homeless to live in. I say we need to catch up with the needed infrastructure. As usual you twist what I say.

Do you really think a future UK government is going to build housing for the poorest and homeless or that private sector landlords are going to let them stay in their properties for a cut price?

I wish they would do but it's wishful thinking, most people don't give a shit and assume everyone on the street is there through some kind of lifestyle choice.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Not true as usual. I said full employment is not nil as there will always be e.g. people between jobs, waiting to start a job or cannot be arsed to work, amongst other reasons.

Record amounts of people coming here allows our economy to prosper and without 3 million EU citizens there would be a collapse. That is not saying that migration "only brings good". You made that bit up ... as usual.
So are you saying that there are not people looking for work but can't get any?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Not true as usual. I never said you were wrong about it being a sham - apart from that there were 2 investigations, both strongly condemning the appointment, but neither saying that it was illegal and must be reversed. I have used the words, annoyed, scam and sham. The rules have to be changed to avoid this happening again ( both investigations said that and I agree with them ). Now back to the benefits of Brexit....
And yet again you come out with the line of it not being illegal. There are rules and regulations to be followed. None if it is covered by law. So it was impossible for a law to be broke. But every rule and regulation was broke.

These rules and regulations were broke by those who run the EU. Those who run the EU are the only ones who could do anything about it. But they didn't.

And my point has always been if they can do it so blatantly and still have nothing to worry about what else do they do? They have nobody to answer to. Yet you want the UK to be ruled by them.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
I’ve not had chance to watch the full speech yet but having just read the coverage on the BBC website I feel I probably owe Astute, SB Bazza and a few others an apology.

It’s not fair to expect you to understand and explain the reasons beyond the empty rhetoric of why Brexit will be great. The PM doesn’t seem to be able to do it either. If the BBC’s coverage is anything to go by she’s well and truly in the “brexit will be great because it just will” camp. It’s not fair to expect joe average on a football forum to do better and for that I wholeheartedly apologise.
1, Not be ruled by a crooked EU.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Do you really think a future UK government is going to build housing for the poorest and homeless or that private sector landlords are going to let them stay in their properties for a cut price?

I wish they would do but it's wishful thinking, most people don't give a shit and assume everyone on the street is there through some kind of lifestyle choice.
So where have I said differently?

Yet you try to make out that the millions of people that have come here to live have made no difference to the situation. And when I mention it you say I am blaming the people who have come here to live.

We either need a few cities the size of Coventry building very quickly or need to slow down the rate our population is going up by. Most of the people who come here are also at the age where they will have a family of their own. This will exasperate the situation in the future.

So do you trust the Tories or Labour to do anything about the housing shortage? And then you have the infrastructure problem.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Just our crooked domestic political system still who are already setting the stage for the diminishment of animal and workers rights once we leave the “constraints” of the EU. Wasted your vote if you voted leave on that basis.
I didn't vote leave. And I have never voted for UKIP either like you have.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
So where have I said differently?

Yet you try to make out that the millions of people that have come here to live have made no difference to the situation. And when I mention it you say I am blaming the people who have come here to live.

We either need a few cities the size of Coventry building very quickly or need to slow down the rate our population is going up by. Most of the people who come here are also at the age where they will have a family of their own. This will exasperate the situation in the future.

So do you trust the Tories or Labour to do anything about the housing shortage? And then you have the infrastructure problem.

Migration has been going on for decades and is nothing new. There's also the issue with people living longer as well. I blame successive governments for not building affordable homes, personally.

Regardless of where theyve come from, whether it be the East or West, migration on the whole has been positive for the country and has assisted in areas such as the NHS.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I admitted I was wrong. Because I’m big enough to do so. You were also wrong but won’t admit that you were. Only you have made a fool of yourself little grendull.

No likes from your friend Mart Tony?
 

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
Anyhow. Meanwhile, back in the real world Heart drug trials halted over Brexit fears
Would be surprised if this was nothing more than SNP influenced scaremongering. A climical trial protocol is a protocol - end of. Once it is approved the trial is carried out according to the protocol...whether it be in ANY EU country or one outside of the EU. These days many include multi-national patient bases both within or outsife of the EU. Someone is trying to stir some shit - that's all imo

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
I’ll live little grendull. Unlike you I don’t measure my life by the number of likes I receive online. Probably why I don’t mind putting my hands up when I’ve got something wrong.

That is SO funny...given that the same 2-4 people - of which you are one - religiously apply 'likes' to each other's posts...sometimes I am convinced without really considering them!!!

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
No likes from your friend Mart Tony?

I was out celebrating reunification day. The end of communism in Germany. Pity some Tories and posters on here haven’t noticed that the USSR has gone. Some are stupid enough to compare communism with the EU. Noticeable that only leavers are that thick.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I was out celebrating reunification day. The end of communism in Germany. Pity some Tories and posters on here haven’t noticed that the USSR has gone. Some are stupid enough to compare communism with the EU. Noticeable that only leavers are that thick.

Was he correct in his analysis of the ERM?
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
Was he correct in his analysis of the ERM?

I didn’t read it. 1992 was the best year of my life financially. I collapsed through overwork because we were breaking all sales records. I lost track of the UK as we were doing so well and I had a couple of months of relaxing and having a good time to recover. So I won’t get involved in this.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
And yet again you come out with the line of it not being illegal. There are rules and regulations to be followed. None if it is covered by law. So it was impossible for a law to be broke. But every rule and regulation was broke.

These rules and regulations were broke by those who run the EU. Those who run the EU are the only ones who could do anything about it. But they didn't.

And my point has always been if they can do it so blatantly and still have nothing to worry about what else do they do? They have nobody to answer to. Yet you want the UK to be ruled by them.

There were two hard investigations, both slammed the appointment, but they couldn’t find sufficient reason to reverse the decision. But, you would rather leave the EU because of a dodgy appointment. Not interested in SM, CU, Europol, European Defence Force, Erasmus, EU Agencies, environmental or worker‘s rights... just a dodgy appointment and we’re off. Selmayr will be gone in 15 to 20 years, but we will suffer short term ( your words ) and maybe long term. What a cock eyed logic. And you ignore the fact that the UK has always had scandals and always will.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Top