Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (33 Viewers)

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Can you not see the issue? It was only lunchtime today we had this:

Literally within a couple of hours we had this:

We've had weeks of being told how this app was vital. Any criticism of us going it alone and using a different app to the rest of the world was brushed aside with a vague 'stop being negative'. Now it turns out our state of the art system will be to do it all by hand. It's embarrassing.
I was just pointing out to the Geoffrey that he had actually already replied to a post saying this

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
177k tests done and still only 2.4k new cases! The end is in sight.... also deaths down substantially from last Wednesday
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
177k tests done
Is that just for one day? The figures weren't available yesterday due to a 'technical issue with the data collection systems'.

Don't mean to be cynical but the highest figure so far this month is 78,537 people tested so that's a hell of a jump. Also we've more than doubled the number of tests but no increases in the number of positive results. Something seems off.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Yes it’s a high number but if we follow the trends in 2 weeks it Hopefully be right down, I rekon by June we might be having single digits or even no deaths

Hope isn't enough to be committed to reopening schools-I want us to at least be regularly below 100 before talking about that. I also fail to understand why we are planning to introduce 2 week quarantines when it's apparently safe to start opening things up or why we didn't quarantine months ago.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Just read this thread on Starmers use of PMQs which makes some good points:



I noticed this the other week when either Raab or Hancock were deputising for the part time PM and plucked some figure on testing out of the air he said good lu k in reaching it and left it at that.
You know if it's not met he'll be onto them about it rather than arguing the toss there and then about whether it was reachable which made sense

I don't think he's been as good as his fanboys and girls make out and definitely not as bad as his haters portray him.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I like it when someone uses Wiki and tries to sound clever especially when quoting an alternate spelling from wiki to sound amazingly intelligent - still spelling my name wrong and not understanding that all he’s doing is an anagram competition to describe himself
He was Danish, Cnut is the correct spelling.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Just read this thread on Starmers use of PMQs which makes some good points:


Get the point he's making but pushing the PM, or whoever is standing in for him, to commit to specifics is of no use if nothing happens when they fail. We all know they very clearly said they'd be testing 100K people a day, every day, by the start of May. That still isn't happening and is hardly mentioned.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
There were not 177k tests done.

It includes tests posted again
Department of Health have now released their figures and its 60,744 people tested.

Also includes a note saying "There have been several revisions to today’s data across all four testing pillars" whatever that's supposed to mean.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Department of Health have now released their figures and its 60,744 people tested.

Also includes a note saying "There have been several revisions to today’s data across all four testing pillars" whatever that's supposed to mean.
Wow that is some extensive figure padding

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Get the point he's making but pushing the PM, or whoever is standing in for him, to commit to specifics is of no use if nothing happens when they fail. We all know they very clearly said they'd be testing 100K people a day, every day, by the start of May. That still isn't happening and is hardly mentioned.

Forensic innit? You build up your case over the trial (next 4 years) then lay it all out at once in a damning summation (general election). Realistically nothing can “happen” to a government with a huge majority until then. The only threat to Johnson is the rest of the Tory Party and that’ll rely on his polling.

Polling has been heading in the right direction (from our POV - Johnson’s already lost his rally round the flag boost and is below Starmer in approval), what more can you ask for? Ranting Corbyn style doesn’t win people over, it just fires up the base.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Forensic innit? You build up your case over the trial (next 4 years) then lay it all out at once in a damning summation (general election). Realistically nothing can “happen” to a government with a huge majority until then. The only threat to Johnson is the rest of the Tory Party and that’ll rely on his polling.

Polling has been heading in the right direction (from our POV - Johnson’s already lost his rally round the flag boost and is below Starmer in approval), what more can you ask for? Ranting Corbyn style doesn’t win people over, it just fires up the base.
This

It's a long game

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Forensic innit? You build up your case over the trial (next 4 years) then lay it all out at once in a damning summation (general election). Realistically nothing can “happen” to a government with a huge majority until then. The only threat to Johnson is the rest of the Tory Party and that’ll rely on his polling.

Polling has been heading in the right direction (from our POV - Johnson’s already lost his rally round the flag boost and is below Starmer in approval), what more can you ask for? Ranting Corbyn style doesn’t win people over, it just fires up the base.

It's like Maxwell-Fyfe v Goring in '45
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Forensic innit? You build up your case over the trial (next 4 years) then lay it all out at once in a damning summation (general election). Realistically nothing can “happen” to a government with a huge majority until then. The only threat to Johnson is the rest of the Tory Party and that’ll rely on his polling.

Polling has been heading in the right direction (from our POV - Johnson’s already lost his rally round the flag boost and is below Starmer in approval), what more can you ask for? Ranting Corbyn style doesn’t win people over, it just fires up the base.

Corbyn ranting? Corbyns style was anything but ranting, particularly at the start. He got criticised for it.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Get the point he's making but pushing the PM, or whoever is standing in for him, to commit to specifics is of no use if nothing happens when they fail. We all know they very clearly said they'd be testing 100K people a day, every day, by the start of May. That still isn't happening and is hardly mentioned.
I don't think we will be waiting years for this inquiry.
Interim is weeks away I'd think .
How damning that becomes could cause a huge shift .
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Corbyn ranting? Corbyns style was anything but ranting, particularly at the start. He got criticised for it.

Maybe ranting is a poor word, but the whole “DAE evil Tories?” stuff in general. It’s so outside the world view of Tory voters and floating voters that it doesn’t cut through like letting them hang themselves with their own targets.

I loved Corbyn at the start, during the leadership campaign. He was genuinely inspiring at times. But I’m a massive leftie and so was everyone else in the room. We all wanted our biases confirmed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top