Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Well-Known Member
Yes but it wasn't one person demanding a slavery statue be ripped down was it. It was a statue that thousands of people had complained about over years, an organisation that owned it refused to listen & see the sheer offensiveness, then lied and pretended the object of the statue was actually a kind & great man, and in the end people had enough of not being listened to. Again- you can read the story all over, that was building up for years- you can't just boil it down to simple terms like that. As for not using companies who benefitted, we've seen things like adverts being pulled from companies- which might not be much but its a start- awareness is rising considerably which will help- is that not a positive thing?
It is possible for the person to be both. It's not Hollywood with goodies and baddies - it's real life with people having both good and bad parts to them.
You can show greatness in terms of leadership or innovation but have horrific personal views (i.e. Churchill). Similarly a person can show great kindness and philanthropy towards some people and yet treat others with disdain and disrespect. As abhorrent as the slave trade was it is still important to remember the context of a person's actions to the period that they lived. What he did was horrific, but in the standards of the day was not unusual. You have to ask would this person do or think the same today if he'd been raised in modern society? I very much doubt it. Some of the more forward thinking industrial reformers like Salt and Cadbury massively improved working and living conditions for their workers and would have been considered raging liberals at the time. By modern standards those conditions and pay would be totally unacceptable.
As I've said before in years to come people may well look upon some of our businesses practices as being inhumane but are considered completely normal now.