skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Interesting argument. The original campaign against the Coulson statue in Bristol was not to have the statue removed but to have a plaque added that acknowledged his involvement in the slave trade. That campaign was won in 2018, two years later the council was still ducking it’s pledge despite even having a black mayor who was involved in that campaign, so much for democracy. Now, had that plaque been retrofitted could you argue that the statue no longer glorifies slavery? It certainly does without that plaque. Bristol has been having a grown up conversation about its involvement in slavery for decades now, typically though those in a position to make the adjustment aren’t keeping up deliberately.Is every statue of somebody who has used or been involved with slavery glorifying it?
I can understand this one where a company was actively defending slavery.