Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (116 Viewers)

Forums New posts
Nick

Nick

Administrator
What would he be sacked under? Gross misconduct?
 
Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
SBT said:
If the Prime Minister releases a statement condemning your "despicable" behaviour in a video that gets national and international TV coverage, you shouldn't be surprised if you end up losing your job, especially if you're a small-time estate agent.
Click to expand...

I'd be livid and claiming what right the self-serving entitled oaf has to call my behaviour 'despicable'. People in crystal houses shouldn't thrown stones.
 
COV

COV

Well-Known Member
Marty said:
Hang on, I think he's a bit of a prick for doing what he did, but the response stinks of typical virtue signalling condescending behaviour. Like I said, the response is a copy and paste job, we've heard it all before... Bah bah bah covidiot bah bah bah adversely affected bah bah bah papers please.
Click to expand...

Both sides are just the same, we see it from the left and the right all the time, every day, then people start throwing around the term "virtue signalling" around when its the side you don't like.

Nobody gives a toss about right & wrong any more, only "whose side is he on"
 
Marty

Marty

Well-Known Member
COV said:
Both sides are just the same, we see it from the left and the right all the time, every day, then people start throwing around the term "virtue signalling" around when its the side you don't like.

Nobody gives a toss about right & wrong any more, only "whose side is he on"
Click to expand...

I agree, both sides are just as bad as each other.
 
skybluetony176

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Marty said:
It was more a case that you could literally copy and paste that response from anywhere. It's pure indoctrination.
Click to expand...
Not sure you understand what indoctrination is. Joining a mob who shout cancel culture like a form of Tourette’s at any type of behaviour that they think shouldn’t have consequences regardless of how obvious it is that it should, pure indoctrination in action. Physically and verbally attacking someone in the street is not freedom of speech.

noun
  1. the process of teaching a person or group to accept a set of beliefs uncritically
 
Sky Blue Pete

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
wingy said:
I'm not saying here anyone has the right to confront, that's the word needed here,not accoste assault haress etc.
But these lads did nothing more than attempt a pissed up conga around a stiff professional bloke who found it oppressive, invasive.
Overreaction here for me ,never appeared violence was on the agenda.
Click to expand...
How would Mr Whitty know that?
 
Marty

Marty

Well-Known Member
skybluetony176 said:
Not sure you understand what indoctrination is. Joining a mob who shout cancel culture like a form of Tourette’s at any type of behaviour that they think shouldn’t have consequences regardless of how obvious it is that it should, pure indoctrination in action. Physically and verbally attacking someone in the street is not freedom of speech.

noun
  1. the process of teaching a person or group to accept a set of beliefs uncritically
Click to expand...

I'm not sure you know what indoctrination is, You're very quick to label those who are displaying concerns or are critical, try to belittle. Almost like you've spent the past year consuming too much time in the indoctrination camps know as main stream media.
 
shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
C2198099-9B80-4E7F-9AA1-400AAB832F4C.jpeg

Marty said:
I'm not sure you know what indoctrination is, You're very quick to label those who are displaying concerns or are critical, try to belittle. Almost like you've spent the past year consuming too much time in the indoctrination camps know as main stream media.
Click to expand...

3B1F9378-F843-4DC8-AE63-F9FA3EC0AF92.jpeg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SBT
skybluetony176

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Marty said:
I'm not sure you know what indoctrination is, You're very quick to label those who are displaying concerns or are critical, try to belittle. Almost like you've spent the past year consuming too much time in the indoctrination camps know as main stream media.
Click to expand...
It’s pretty clear it’s consequential from his behaviour. He hasn’t been cancelled in any sense of the word. And to accuse people of being indoctrinated by MSM. I’m judging the guy from the video he posted not MSM. I don’t need anyone to point out that he’s behaving like a complete dick and like all dickish behaviour there’s consequences. That’s just life. Maybe he’ll learn his lesson and either not behave that way again or if he is dickish enough to do it again at least not be stupid enough to post it online. Especially if you’re a face of the company he works for.
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
Yes you can watch the clip, after the event and knowing the outcome, and say there was not intent of violence there.

But you can clearly see the guy is shit scared and if two blokes grab you in a park, knowing that a large group of the population don't like you (wrongly), then I think it's fair to assume he feared for his safety and the two blokes were totally out of order
 
Sky Blue Pete

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
If, like me you had been robbed at knifepoint you may well see things differently. That’s all I’ll say. Nothing bog or clever about their actions other than having the balls to apologise. And nothing woke or cancel culture for them to lose their jobs or what really should have happened been charged with common assault
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
chiefdave said:
I mean its not like the blokes father was murdered on the way home from work or anything, oh wait ...
Click to expand...
I have no idea and that has no bearing in the sense that fragile People meet awkward situations daily .
If Whitty's father suffered that horrible event that is awful, but like all fragile folk, for all kinds of reasons are exposed to unpleasant situations daily.
I wasn't aware so understably neither would the two lads/men.
I think the media language at the outset was over the top wrong,assualt was used by the been ,the guy should not be losing his job.
 
D

Deleted member 11652

Guest
Sky Blue Pete said:
If, like me you had been robbed at knifepoint you may well see things differently. That’s all I’ll say. Nothing bog or clever about their actions other than having the balls to apologise. And nothing woke or cancel culture for them to lose their jobs or what really should have happened been charged with common assault
Click to expand...

I’ve been mugged by a group of lads and I see it the exact same as Marty does👍🏻
 
Sky Blue Pete

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
wingy said:
I have no idea and that has no bearing in the sense that fragile People meet awkward situations daily .
If Whitty's father suffered that horrible event that is awful, but like all fragile folk, for all kinds of reasons are exposed to unpleasant situations daily.
I wasn't aware so understably neither would the two lads/men.
I think the media language at the outset was over the top wrong,assualt was used by the been ,the guy should not be losing his job.
Click to expand...
Just bollox
 
Sky Blue Pete

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
wingy said:
I have no idea and that has no bearing in the sense that fragile People meet awkward situations daily .
If Whitty's father suffered that horrible event that is awful, but like all fragile folk, for all kinds of reasons are exposed to unpleasant situations daily.
I wasn't aware so understably neither would the two lads/men.
I think the media language at the outset was over the top wrong,assualt was used by the been ,the guy should not be losing his job.
Click to expand...
It’s clearly common assault
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
chiefdave said:
I mean its not like the blokes father was murdered on the way home from work or anything, oh wait ...
Click to expand...

he was murdered by Palestine extremists wasn’t he?
 
Sky Blue Pete

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Well all 3 of you are completely wrong

Common assault is when a victim is made to feel that force will be used against them. No actual force needs to be applied, just the threat or fear that this may happen. This can also include threatening gestures such as fist shaking. This becomes battery when the actual application of force is involved.12 Nov 2020

The link is from here OUR GUIDE TO COMMON ASSAULT, ABH AND GBH
 
covmark

covmark

Well-Known Member
Sky Blue Pete said:
Well all 3 of you are completely wrong

Common assault is when a victim is made to feel that force will be used against them. No actual force needs to be applied, just the threat or fear that this may happen. This can also include threatening gestures such as fist shaking. This becomes battery when the actual application of force is involved.12 Nov 2020
Click to expand...
Fuck me. Fist shaking? Have a day off mate.

They were pissed up twats, who spotted a recognisable bloke and wanted to get a few photos. Shouldn't have done it and they're pricks. But lose their job over it? Nah, not for me.
As for assault????

Sent from my SM-G780F using Tapatalk
 
Sky Blue Pete

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
covmark said:
Fuck me. Fist shaking? Have a day off mate.

They were pissed up twats, who spotted a recognisable bloke and wanted to get a few photos. Shouldn't have done it and they're pricks. But lose their job over it? Nah, not for me.
As for assault????

Sent from my SM-G780F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
What are you arguing with , it’s the law

Common assault is defined as above gosh this is hard
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 112 (members: 0, guests: 112)
Top