21/22 Summer transfer mega-thread (8 Viewers)

skybluegod

Well-Known Member
Just hope we can either hold onto everyone first team or get enough to add quality in several positions if we do lose someone.

Feeling quite positive about the first XI, but we’ve got three more loans we could use and it’d be nice to get some cover in across the pitch.

Slightly concerning we didn’t trust Jones to make an impact over Allen when chasing the game yesterday and that Bright still isn’t around the first team. If they aren’t going to make it maybe an AM loan in, maybe a ST until Jan while Walker and Godden are recovering. CM obviously a concern while Kelly and Eccles are out.

I actually thought he wouldn't add much? Maatsen and Dabo were providing good width and causing issues, we needed Allen on to provide that extra runner beyond the defence and the front men, and tbf it worked, we just missed the bloody pen it got us!
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
What do we reckon this last loan is then?


I reckon a CM. MR will see were missing a James'esque player there and hopefully try and remedy
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
It’s a real shame short term loans aren’t a thing any more, a CM and a ST for a month would be perfect.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
It’s a real shame short term loans aren’t a thing any more, a CM and a ST for a month would be perfect.

Why? By the time they find their feet they would be gone.
 

Frostie

Well-Known Member
It’s a LWB, he’s said this multiple times. Said a CM will wait until Jan.


In fairness, the Telegraph have contradicted themselves on this (shock, horror) so can understand the confusion.

They initially said we were targeting a CM & had given up on a 2nd LWB, now they've flipped it. One from the CC84 playbook meaning they're right either way (and ignoring the fact that they are also wrong either way too).
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
In fairness, the Telegraph have contradicted themselves on this (shock, horror) so can understand the confusion.

They initially said we were targeting a CM & had given up on a 2nd LWB, now they've flipped it. One from the CC84 playbook meaning they're right either way (and ignoring the fact that they are also wrong either way too).

When did they say that? I’ve only ever seen them say 2LWBs and a CB
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Pretty sure we all agree the CM position is much more important to get covered than LWB

TBH we’ve only got options at AM if Jones and Bright can get mentally and physically fit both of which are huge question marks. So I’m not yet massively happy there either.

Someone who could cover both AM and CM, or a LWB who can cover RWB or LCB would be ideal.
 

KersleyDigs

Well-Known Member
TBH we’ve only got options at AM if Jones and Bright can get mentally and physically fit both of which are huge question marks. So I’m not yet massively happy there either.

Someone who could cover both AM and CM, or a LWB who can cover RWB or LCB would be ideal.
Ryan Giles would have been perfect ;-) Can cover LWB, AML, AMR
 

Great_Expectations

Well-Known Member
Pretty sure we all agree the CM position is much more important to get covered than LWB

Not sure. While not ideal we at least have cover at CM in Allen and Shipley - and even Howley.

We have nothing at LWB if Maasten gets injured. DaCosta is an option in theory but most of this forum have written it off at RWB never mind left. Reid is way too green, so we’d be left with someone like Pask playing massively out of position.

I’d also argue the wing backs are absolutely pivotal to our formation and system, and are single points of failure. At least at CM there’s two of them and/or you can switch formation to a three to account for any weaknesses.

But absolutely agree two loan LWB is poor. It’s really disappointing we don’t have a young hot prospect coming through.
 

Northants Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Players who are genuinely comfortable in 2 positions would solve a lot of issues going forward.
We hear Gus can cover, maybe Jones too, not sure about the rest?

Obviously Dion stands out in the past as a more than competent emergency centre-half
 

Alkhen

Well-Known Member
Seems a bit odd to get 2 LWBs on loan, gonna be hard to keep them both happy and not disrupt the squad like it was with Giles and McCallum. Would Reid be that bad a backup? I trust in Robins obviously but would like a another CM option at least until Kelly and Eccles areback
 

SkyblueDad

Well-Known Member
From what I saw Saturday It looked to me that Maatsen is more than capable of doing the business at LWB and could be even better after a few games and with JCS next to him on that basis I would prefer getting in an attacking midfielder ahead of LWB we need other options in that area imo.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Seems a bit odd to get 2 LWBs on loan, gonna be hard to keep them both happy and not disrupt the squad like it was with Giles and McCallum. Would Reid be that bad a backup? I trust in Robins obviously but would like a another CM option at least until Kelly and Eccles areback

Im guessing Kelly isn’t a million miles away if Goddens started today and they were both about the same distance away
 

better days

Well-Known Member
I think Maatsen showed us yesterday what a good player he is and is going to be and with the left sided Salter-Clarke next to him will improve so do we need another on loan LWB ahead of another midfielder not sure we do, permanent maybe I don’t want a repeat of last season with two loaned in young LWBs one hardly being used at the expense of possibly an attacking midfield player to me that’s just a waste of a loan place.
Pretty good call I reckon
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Given we changed our minds about loaning Reid back so he could be cover last season after Giles was recalled, what changes to stop him being the same this season?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

skyblueinswansea

Well-Known Member
In fairness, the Telegraph have contradicted themselves on this (shock, horror) so can understand the confusion.

They initially said we were targeting a CM & had given up on a 2nd LWB, now they've flipped it. One from the CC84 playbook meaning they're right either way (and ignoring the fact that they are also wrong either way too).

could CC84 actually be Andy Turner? Has anyone ever seen them in the same room?
 

SleepyGinger

Well-Known Member
Kyle Hudlin the 6ft9 striker from Solihull that was mentioned on here is being watched by Man City scouts according to the athletic.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top