Grendel
Well-Known Member
I don't know what happened but having sex with someone who is trafficked is illegal.
The trial was not a legal issue but a civil action
I don't know what happened but having sex with someone who is trafficked is illegal.
I know that obviously.The trial was not a legal issue but a civil action
I know that obviously.
You said technically he hadn't committed an offence, although I don't know how you can possibly know. I think you were basing that on her not being under the age of consent in this country. However I was just saying sex with a trafficked person is illegal in this country.
Actually in some cases it is. 18 is the age of consent in the UK where the older person is in a 'position of trust', eg: a teacher, social worker, relative, etc.Don't get me wrong, i think he may well be involved (though don't forget that consensual sex with a 17 year old is not illegal in this country)
What?Im merely quoting the legal position regarding the CPS
Maybe he can send me some too. I've never met him either.In summary...
A man gives c.8 million quid to a woman he claims to never have met.
Hmmm.
"Relative"Actually in some cases it is. 18 is the age of consent in the UK where the older person is in a 'position of trust', eg: a teacher, social worker, relative, etc.
Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 2000 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Right, that's it! I am off to see if I can eek some money out of my Uncle Joe."Relative"
He's done nothing wrong .
He's giving twelve million to a woman he's never wronged and in fact has never met in his life . He knows however, that she's suffered in her past so is generously giving her money to her to try and help her to rebuild her life.
I'd say he was an incredibly kind and generous soul and the world would be a much better place if everyone had just a fraction of this man's unselfishness.
Also he’s wallet has took such a hit now when he fancies an Hawaiian he’s going to have to get down to Pizza Hut rather than Pizza Express
He should work as a towel collector at a sauna.As he doesn’t sweat he won’t be wasting his hard earned money on deodorant
I wonder what it was that suddenly made him feel so generous after helping her rack up legal fees by denying the claimHe's done nothing wrong .
He's giving twelve million to a woman he's never wronged and in fact has never met in his life . He knows however, that she's suffered in her past so is generously giving her money to her to try and help her to rebuild her life.
I'd say he was an incredibly kind and generous soul and the world would be a much better place if everyone had just a fraction of this man's unselfishness.
Absolutely. The man is a philanthropist in every sense of the word.Also he’s wallet has took such a hit now when he fancies an Hawaiian he’s going to have to get down to Pizza Hut rather than Pizza Express
Just remember on that photograph it's not his hand. They've never met.I wonder what it was that suddenly made him feel so generous after helping her rack up legal fees by denying the claim
No it isn't as he does not have the legal capacity to consentwell if a 15 year old schoolboy was happy to engage in sexual relations with a 39 year old woman would this Be acceptable especially if the woman was in authority
Wasn’t one of the alleged offences in America?Why are we getting sidetracked by the age of consent? She was above the age of consent in this country apparently. The issue was that it is alleged that she had been trafficked for sex.
well if a 15 year old schoolboy was happy to engage in sexual relations with a 39 year old woman would this Be acceptable especially if the woman was in authority
Probably me asking about when something is morally wrong but not criminally and vice versa. For interest really for peoples opinionsWhy are we getting sidetracked by the age of consent? She was above the age of consent in this country apparently. The issue was that it is alleged that she had been trafficked for sex.
Fair enough but it is criminal even if not underageProbably me asking about when something is morally wrong but not criminally and vice versa. For interest really for peoples opinions
Absolutely agreeFair enough but it is criminal even if not underage
Slightly disappointed she didn’t take any other “names” with her in an attempt to get some time off.