Earlsdon_Skyblue1
Well-Known Member
How many times has it been said that the regulations were different for Johson's and Starmer's incidents.
Of course if either had broken any of the regulations in place at the time they should resign. i just find it a bit suss that when saying not sticking up for Johnson you then immediately follow it by mentioning Starmer's possible breach (rather than Johnson's numerous possible breaches)
I think he's just being objective.
There's not really anyone who is sensibly debating on this thread sticking up for Boris from what I can see, but this whole 'it was a different time', 'it's ok when we do it' kind of attitude I don't think is very helpful either.
I'm not sure I fully trust the authorities to do a proper investigation, but at the same time if they are each or both guilty then they have to go. I've made my view clear and the evidence looks pretty conclusive to me. I don't think the leaders of either main party should even allow any grey areas on this in the first place so I'm not very tolerant towards it. As some of the stories posted here have shown, it really is a disgrace to those people who suffered at the hands of those very rules.
I did never agree with said rules and they really pissed me off, heck, I argued it on here forever, but I did stick to them, and the fact those guys probably didn't... Well, it is totally unacceptable in my eyes.
Let's try not let them divide us over this.