Philosoraptor
Well-Known Member
You could draw a little graph mate.
I would imagine there would be a queue of solicitors ready to take it on with no win, no fee.
You could draw a little graph mate.
I would imagine there would be a queue of solicitors ready to take it on with no win, no fee.
Keep imagining
Keep imagining
I would imagine there would be a queue of solicitors ready to take it on with no win, no fee.
Some already offering.
Fox killers in kimonos?
No. Though I'd imagine it's his sort of thing.
It is outrageous to be fair.
The police have a very difficult job with mass crowds in these situations. It’s a potential terrorist hotspot and with people getting injured with overspill of crowds. They’ll be all be on duty for hours and it’s hardly much fun.
The last thing the need is some twat who thinks he’s being edgy shouting his mouth off which in itself can inflame the crowd.
If he wants to make a stand surely he should confront the courts by himself and plead his case.
The police have a very difficult job with mass crowds in these situations. It’s a potential terrorist hotspot and with people getting injured with overspill of crowds. They’ll be all be on duty for hours and it’s hardly much fun.
The last thing the need is some twat who thinks he’s being edgy shouting his mouth off which in itself can inflame the crowd.
If he wants to make a stand surely he should confront the courts by himself and plead his case.
Should it be a crime to make anti monarchy comments in public?
That’s not an offence so if that’s the charge it’s not even a crime
People have been arrested for holding up placards saying not my king, its scandalous.
They made anti monarchy statements and got arrested. Do you agree they should have been?
The snarling left even lacks dignity when the head of state isn’t even buried
yes as it’s a breach of public order and likely to cause an affray. If the crowd started attacking him should they have stood and watched him get a kick in?
Sounds like they let people breaking the law get away with it.yes as it’s a breach of public order and likely to cause an affray. If the crowd started attacking him should they have stood and watched him get a kick in?
And the far right are very selective in when they champion freedom of speech.
Well as I say the police could have done nothing and let him have a shoe in.
yes as it’s a breach of public order and likely to cause an affray. If the crowd started attacking him should they have stood and watched him get a kick in?
You fancy getting a big group together to attack Boddy?Well as I say the police could have done nothing and let him have a shoe in.
So you should arrest people to save them from assault?!
You're arguing that gobbling off is a more serious offence than assaulting someone.
So they should arrest him rather than the people attacking him? What sort of justice is that?Well as I say the police could have done nothing and let him have a shoe in.
A journalist held up a blank placard to see what would happen and sure enough the police came and talked to him.People have been arrested for holding up placards saying not my king, its scandalous.
Look forward to them dragging people from roadsyes as it’s a breach of public order and likely to cause an affray. If the crowd started attacking him should they have stood and watched him get a kick in?
Imagine swaggering down to the pub later to tell everybody you defended Prince Andrew in public.
yes as it’s a breach of public order and likely to cause an affray. If the crowd started attacking him should they have stood and watched him get a kick in?
Even worse, imagine swaggering down the pub later to tell everybody you were the little twat who heckled him.
He's a barrister not a solicitor. I thought a man of your standing would know the differenceFox killers in kimonos?
You doing the "Grenners is wrong then runs away" thing again?I honestly can’t be bothered I’ll leave this to take it’s oh so predictable course