Strange analogy but in response if my electricity supply kept cutting off I wouldn’t pay my bill or would expect a discount. If the service was poor I would move to a different electricity supplier.
As I said above, I get it, people on here agree with all unions and all their actions. Fair enough but I don’t. There’s one thing protecting members and making sure conditions are acceptable (100% what unions should do) but I’ve posted some of the suggested changes to train drivers conditions before and many were hardly workhouse rules as I said at the time. BMA have also done stuff I don’t agree with
Its not a strange analogy. Inflation affects all inputs to a business. Be it energy, wood and metal, or Human Resources. But we decide it’s easier to bully a person into lower wages than bully a supplier into lower prices.
Pay should keep up with inflation as the most basic level, otherwise you are signalling that the job isn’t as important as it was.
For Doctors and Teachers in particular that’s lead to a staffing shortage as the job market responds to that signal.
The Cameron/Osborne approach was to pretend you could just not do stuff. Don’t build any infrastructure. Don’t keep pay up with inflation. And surprise surprise it all came falling down around them.
The so called worst examples, and actually ones I have the most sympathy with the right with, train drivers I’ve just shown haven’t had their wages rise by inflation in the last 13 years. So even them with their ridiculous tactics are falling behind. And still people are moaning and wanting their pay cut more.
Public sector employees can’t negotiate individually. Budgets are set by government. They can only get paid what the government agrees, and the government is far worse than most employers at paying a fair wage. Collective bargaining is the only option to prevent political pressures from cutting wages and with it demand from the economy.