Do you want to discuss boring politics? (15 Viewers)

PVA

Well-Known Member
He had better get a move on then. One of the things about getting older is that time passes by so fast. The next 4 years will be gone in a flash. Immigration will not have gone down, no growth, missed housing targets, hugely increased energy bills - and no Tories to blame.

If only people were this willing to hold the government to account for the last 13 years.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
If only people were this willing to hold the government to account for the last 13 years.

Governments are always held to account when there is a general election
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
They’re mostly pissing off Tory voters at the moment TBF. They’re just not also making their voters happy. Starmer slow boring theory is that after five years people will look up and see immigration down, growth up, etc. There’s not much in terms of public opinion that’s going to sway him from that yet.
He needs to learn from Trump winning that this argument will not win the election even if it’s true.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Tax is telling people how to live their life now?
I think it is, yes. If the argument about heat pumps had been won it would be unnecessary.

Taxes can often be a means to direct people to live their lives in a certain way, eg tobacco duty and the £2 to come on a bottle of vape liquid. When I vaped I was buying them from onepoundliquid. Not hard to work out that the price will triple and threepoundliquidbuttwopounisagovernmentripoff isn’t quite as catchy.

They will be taxing meat at some point.

In the meantime, let’s cosy up to climate change drivers China to get trade benefits.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I think it is, yes. If the argument about heat pumps had been won it would be unnecessary.

Taxes can often be a means to direct people to live their lives in a certain way, eg tobacco duty and the £2 to come on a bottle of vape liquid. When I vaped I was buying them from onepoundliquid. Not hard to work out that the price will triple and threepoundliquidbuttwopounisagovernmentripoff isn’t quite as catchy.

They will be taxing meat at some point.

In the meantime, let’s cosy up to climate change drivers China to get trade benefits.

It’s also a way of capturing externalities.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Genuine question from this: do you think climate change is a hoax?
I’m not convinced that the UK should be leading the way on this.

Im certainly not convinced that a system requiring taking heat out of cold air is going to prove all that effective, especially when the power cuts start. It is very expensive to run.

And then no one will be able to charge their cars to get to work!
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I have no idea what that means,

The costs of something aren’t always captured in its sale price. Some things have external negative impacts (climate change pollution, increased healthcare costs etc) so we tax them to pay for those. Same argument as tax on fags and alcohol cos you have to pay for the NHS.

The argument for a climate tax isn’t nudge theory, it’s that people who emit carbon don’t pay the price to fix that at source.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I’m not convinced that the UK should be leading the way on this.

Im certainly not convinced that a system requiring taking heat out of cold air is going to prove all that effective, especially when the power cuts start. It is very expensive to run.

And then no one will be able to charge their cars to get to work!

Heat pumps are effective. Our problem IMO is not allowing air con (a two way heat pump) as part of it, I think if we did people would see more benefits. Our other problem is my house for example has less insulation than an instagram model so heat pump just wouldn’t work until that could be fixed. I imagine I’m more common than not in that respect.

The power cuts won’t start, you’ve been reading too much right wing press. We should be building new nuclear though.

Ultimately the energy transition is happening. British homes are uniquely poorly insulated and heated.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Heat pumps are effective. Our problem IMO is not allowing air con (a two way heat pump) as part of it, I think if we did people would see more benefits. Our other problem is my house for example has less insulation than an instagram model so heat pump just wouldn’t work until that could be fixed. I imagine I’m more common than not in that respect.

The power cuts won’t start, you’ve been reading too much right wing press. We should be building new nuclear though.

Ultimately the energy transition is happening. British homes are uniquely poorly insulated and heated.

It appears the peak sales have been reached and targets will be missed in Europe

 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
If somebody wants to come and insulate my home and put the latest tech in to keep me warm / cool for free then I am all for it.

I've been trying for nearly 3 years to get a smart meter so I won't hold much hope!

No same. And I don’t qualify for shit.
To be clear you aren’t paying this rumoured tax, it’s on boiler companies who fail to sell enough heat pumps.
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
No same. And I don’t qualify for shit.
To be clear you aren’t paying this rumoured tax, it’s on boiler companies who fail to sell enough heat pumps.

As you alluded too, heat pumps do not work for the majority of homes without major re work to the property.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
As you alluded too, heat pumps do not work for the majority of homes without major re work to the property.

Yeah and any targets should take that into account. With respect I’m not sure we’re ever going to see eye to eye on this as you seem to think AA batteries are a woke plot.
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
Yeah and any targets should take that into account. With respect I’m not sure we’re ever going to see eye to eye on this as you seem to think AA batteries are a woke plot.

What the fuck are you going on about?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
If somebody wants to come and insulate my home and put the latest tech in to keep me warm / cool for free then I am all for it.

I've been trying for nearly 3 years to get a smart meter so I won't hold much hope!
Basic insulation on my house would be thousands, no way I can afford that. Apparently you used to be able to get it paid for with a grant but obviously that's been stopped. Upshot is whatever heating solution I put in my house its going to be massively inefficient if the heat just goes straight out the house.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Yeah and any targets should take that into account. With respect I’m not sure we’re ever going to see eye to eye on this as you seem to think AA batteries are a woke plot.
"Should" is such a big but empty word. I far prefer "must".

I didn't realise I could heat my home on a couple of Duracells.:)
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Basic insulation on my house would be thousands, no way I can afford that. Apparently you used to be able to get it paid for with a grant but obviously that's been stopped. Upshot is whatever heating solution I put in my house its going to be massively inefficient if the heat just goes straight out the house.
Theoretically heat pumps are more efficient than boilers, producing something like 3.5 times as much heat energy as the electrical energy used to do so. Problem is electricity costs 4 times as much as gas (on my tariff) and so the heating is higher cost. So energy efficient but not cost effective.

The heat escaping from your house would escape whatever the heating system, but as heat pumps work on a lot lower temperature heating sources (e.g. radiator temperatures) and the source of heat is less extractable when outside temperatures are low (i.e. just when you need the heating on) it can make the system ineffective if mega insulation isn't installed.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
No same. And I don’t qualify for shit.
To be clear you aren’t paying this rumoured tax, it’s on boiler companies who fail to sell enough heat pumps.
So the consumer want face increased costs?

Just like the working person won't end up paying the increased employer NIC costs through higher consumer prices.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
The costs of something aren’t always captured in its sale price. Some things have external negative impacts (climate change pollution, increased healthcare costs etc) so we tax them to pay for those. Same argument as tax on fags and alcohol cos you have to pay for the NHS.

The argument for a climate tax isn’t nudge theory, it’s that people who emit carbon don’t pay the price to fix that at source.
You are right, it isn't nudge theory. It is a full-blown shove in the back.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top