Kcic front bid to buy club (18 Viewers)
- Thread starter Nick
- Start date
Nick
Administrator
I haven't rubbished it, I've asked some decent constructive questions through the thread and got abuse because of it?
I have never one mentioned normal business practise?
If it was to be kept to themselves then what's with the short deadline before they run to the press with it,where the cet sat waiting with articles? It isn't that low key is it?
If they had been completely quiet about it then fair enough.
Michael does have power over the questions we are asking though, else he wouldn't be asked them?
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
If I was Michael with so much negativity I wouldn't bother. I hope he realises it's only a few attention seeking individuals, the rest want SISU to respond with a request for details and hopefully the offer will prove to be robust enough for them to accept it. Don't have much hope but the little bit I have I will hold onto.
The Gentleman
Well-Known Member
I don't think it's acceptable for sisu to not answer questions, the same way I don't that Michael rants about them not answering questions and then acts just like them when if he came out with a fantastic deal with details and answered questions it would put even more pressure on them.
It's like me campaigning against murder and then going out and murdering somebody because they did it.[/QUOTE]
No Nick, you're absolutely right. You can ask questions of Miichael and ask questions of Sisu.
I however have just one question for you, can you show me a thread where you have got so wound up about asking serious questions of Sisu on some of the far worse things they have done?
It's like me campaigning against murder and then going out and murdering somebody because they did it.[/QUOTE]
No Nick, you're absolutely right. You can ask questions of Miichael and ask questions of Sisu.
I however have just one question for you, can you show me a thread where you have got so wound up about asking serious questions of Sisu on some of the far worse things they have done?
ccfcway
Well-Known Member
Completely miss the point why don't you
Nick, im sure you could find a better comparison
yer, its exactly like campaigning against murder :facepalm:[/QUOTE]
Completely miss the point why don't you
[/QUOTE]think you need a better analogy.
Nick
Administrator
Completely miss the point why don't you
[/QUOTE]think you need a better analogy.
[/QUOTE]Yep I agree I could probably have picked a different one, but people get the point!
Nick
Administrator
I haven't been wound up though? I have asked constructive questions on a platform that the person who will know the answers is posting about the thing I am asking questions about.
Kingokings204
Well-Known Member
Any update micheal?
ccfcway
Well-Known Member
A merger may relegate the Portsmouth thread .
the SISU v Higgs case beat that
ccfcway
Well-Known Member
so, no-one from SISU posts on here ?
Nick
Administrator
I can't say 100% they don't, but I know 100% Tim Fisher isn't coming here saying "Back our new stadium we have no facts about to give you" else all of the questions etc would be fully justified.
It was only ever people from ACL posting on here, they mustn't have been trained up properly!
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
He doesn't? Why aren't you treating him and sisu equally then?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Why aren't you I think is the point!
Nick
Administrator
I have said many times I think the stadium is bullshit in my opinion because of the lack of facts, so this offer should be treated the same?
More to the point, why aren't you treating them equally rather than defending with the "It's ok, as SISU do the same thing".
Completely miss the point why don't you
think you need a better analogy.
[/QUOTE]Yep I agree I could probably have picked a different one, but people get the point![/QUOTE]
I get It ,Just playing ..More Context required ,How did you kill them ,did they deserve It :facepalm:
ccfcway
Well-Known Member
no, he has just done that at fan forums, in CET, on CWR, at stadium forum, in national press etc
Nick
Administrator
Yes, which is why people think it is a load of shite and that he talks bollocks, the same reason other people are going mad about it? Yet the same people going mad about that think it is ok to do exactly the same?
This whole thing of people comparing Michael with SISU doesn't shine him in a good light.
ccfcway
Well-Known Member
Has Michael actually said he wont answer the questions ?
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
And Michael hasn't got a local female lawyer holding "independent" forums about his offer either. If he did that would that make you happy?
At the end of the day Michael is being unusually quite, I suspect things have to happen before he can say too much I.E. a response from sisu (the fact that he's spelt that out in more than one reply is a pretty big clue) and now a lot of the people who are constantly slagging him off for saying too much are now slagging him off for not saying enough.
Last edited:
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
I think he should hold an open forum in say.............three weeks. He should also invite orange Ken, that will clear things up.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
He can say if he has spoken to ACL and the football league and agreed a deal in principal.
It would be odd if he didn't.
ccfcway
Well-Known Member
maybe the day before the JR ruling ?
Nick
Administrator
In reply to me asking if there were any answers to the constructive questions I got:
So I would take that as a no comment
covmark
Well-Known Member
Why not just keep quiet about it all until sisu have responded, smacks of a publicity stunt.
Nick
Administrator
So keep it quiet and don't run to the press at every given opportunity?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
At least we now know the posters on here who believed Jo Dinsah was buying the club.
Namely those who believe any shit that they want to hear.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
And if he has and the deals were agreed in confidence it would be odd if he did.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
That would be too soon surely. The day before the new season kicks off would work much better.
covmark
Well-Known Member
People like to jump on a bandwagon. When sisu came in they were the saviours to many (me included) but we didn't know who the investors were. Looks like the same is happening here, its the 'anyone but sisu' stance. Once bitten twice shy, no one can complain if supporters are a little bit wary of offers from faceless investors or investors that had their fingers in the sisu pie to begin with.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
It would to be odd to confirm he has an offer from acl (not disclosed) to offer sisu? Are you for real?