Hopefully we will be given a more detailed reasoning as to why the bid was rejected.
It would be interesting to know what the content of both bids were but unlikely we will be told. In particular I would be interested to see the conditions and legal demands included in the bid relayed by Appleton and of course the difference between the two bids.
Ownership of part of ACL is gone, not what I wanted to see but it is where we are. We as a club now have to move forward, no more of this uncertainty, blame game and legal shenanigans. We build our club up from here, or we sit around wringing our hands blaming all and sundry.
If that's a new ground so be it (I still don't see it, but if that's the choice then CCFC fans must and will have to support it). If they are going to build there is no real reason the land purchase can not be completed and the site made public. There after they must put forward a business plan that convinces the fans it will work. They will need to get the fans on board with it, no more silly secrecy games. Proper inclusion and partnership not lip service through things like the SCG
If the solution is to stay at the Ricoh then CCFC need to develop long term partnerships with ACL and its new owners, then to commit to it. That word partnership again. This club needs stability and certainty. There are income streams that the club can acquire an interest in at the Ricoh, they could even put on their own events etc, the club could commit to a longer lease/licence at the stadium with rights to certain incomes built in etc.
There are options but more than ever the owners of CCFC have to secure a clear way forward for the club, one that is stable and commit to it. One that is focussed and solely about CCFC
Decision time.