SkyBlue_Bear83
Well-Known Member
Apparently they are appealing the verdict for which he pleaded not guilty but was found guilty, fucking pathetic
Apparently they are appealing the verdict for which he pleaded not guilty but was found guilty, fucking patheticHis sister has tried to start up a Justice for Johnson campaign. Its gone about as well as you would imagine.
How can you have a campaign for justice for someone who pled guilty???
Unless she means for the sentence.
Yeah, remember this one. It's ridiculous isn't it and there is no consistency whatsoever.
Slightly different IMO .... she was age 20 and clearly a can short of a six pack, the law is different for men and women (in relation to having sex), if a girl is over 13 but under 16 and the man is under 24 then he has a defence in certain circumstances.
Even if it was the same offence, Johnson would be outside of this age anyway in other words he's old enough to know better.
He deserves every hour he spends in prison and the victim should fleece him of every £ he's got, particularly the £3 million he supposedly earnt after Sunderland knew what he'd done (debatable who actually knew at Sunderland !)
What about the teaching assistants and teachers?
Should the victim fleece him? Is she actually going to be mentally scarred for the rest of her life?
Not sure what you mean about teachers ?
Nope! Me neither. He had to go to prison, but where is the consistency?I'm not normally an apologist for this but 6 years seems staggering. Ched Evans had 5 years. Lee Hughes 6 years.
I don't get it.
I'm not normally an apologist for this but 6 years seems staggering. Ched Evans had 5 years. Lee Hughes 6 years.
I don't get it.
Why do teachers get 2 years for full sex with pupils?What??
This is all about Intent, continual grooming her knowing full well her age, no remorse and then not pleading guilty. Thats why its six years. judge deems it all premeditated and calculating.
Exactly!Why do teachers get 2 years for full sex with pupils?
Isn't grooming just as bad? Without the grooming the other two wouldn't happen would they?SEXUAL TOUCHING: Five years.
KISSING: Four months (concurrent).
GROOMING: One year (consecutive).
That's why it's 6 years.
Rolf Harris got less didn't he? They were as young as seven
Pity he wont do 6 years
Also this:
Breaking: Adam Johnson was arrested on suspicion of possessing extreme pornography involving animals, but police are no longer pursuing it.
Just a bit of banter though hey Pipes?
Guessing it could have been a lot less had he have pleaded guilty and shown remorse.The maximum he can have taken off is 10% apparantly. Assuming his appeal fails.
Could it just be he typed 'hairy beaver' in his search engine and the wrong thing came up?Also this:
Breaking: Adam Johnson was arrested on suspicion of possessing extreme pornography involving animals, but police are no longer pursuing it.
Just a bit of banter though hey Pipes?
Exactly, there's no way he shouldn't have been sent down. But the sentencing isn't consistent is it?I think the point being made is the huge inconsistency over a range of crimes not that the bloke deserves any pity
A better punishment would have been a massive fine which could have been seized from his football wages. Since he will now languish in jail, there will be no income to distribute.
It does in all fairness seem harsh. No responsibility seems to have been taken by the parents of this young teen or the girl herself. that's not excusing Johnson by the way - he has been an idiot. But the law is the law and must be followed even though we can find it inconsistent where it's values are attributed.
Hmmm.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?