Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Wow. Absolutely bang on. Thanks for sharing that
Wow. Absolutely bang on. Thanks for sharing thatThought this was excellent (and a far better take than Sultanas)
No one has said that.No excuse for them not being safe
Their employers have by not taking action to protect themNo one has said that.
Just explaining why they have to work
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
They could have reacted much better and much more quickly . Put up clear protective screens between the drivers and passengers. Minimal contact. It's all pretty much pay with no change given anyway isn't it.Their employers have by not taking action to protect them
yes and i agree but as the original question was why are they still at work a different issueTheir employers have by not taking action to protect them
Friends of mine who work in shops are still getting climbed over as they are filling up by nob heads who won't wait a minute for people to finish what they are doing. You are right, the process needs to change because some people won't. Everybody deserves protectionThey could have reacted much better and much more quickly . Put up clear protective screens between the drivers and passengers. Minimal contact. It's all pretty much pay with no change given anyway isn't it.
It's tragic that so many drivers have lost their lives.
I've said something similar about my wife and her job. She works at a shop.
I said to her, instead of letting customers just wander around the store, they should have set up temporary barriers and gone back to the old corner shop way of shopping, where customers come in, say what they want at a distance and the assistant goes and gets the stuff for them. I have been saying it for weeks now.
I think we could have reduced contact with people in many, many professions.
There are screens in the cabs but they aren't air tight.They could have reacted much better and much more quickly . Put up clear protective screens between the drivers and passengers. Minimal contact. It's all pretty much pay with no change given anyway isn't it.
It's tragic that so many drivers have lost their lives.
I've said something similar about my wife and her job. She works at a shop.
I said to her, instead of letting customers just wander around the store, they should have set up temporary barriers and gone back to the old corner shop way of shopping, where customers come in, say what they want at a distance and the assistant goes and gets the stuff for them. I have been saying it for weeks now.
I think we could have reduced contact with people in many, many professions.
They could have reacted much better and much more quickly . Put up clear protective screens between the drivers and passengers. Minimal contact. It's all pretty much pay with no change given anyway isn't it.
It's tragic that so many drivers have lost their lives.
I've said something similar about my wife and her job. She works at a shop.
I said to her, instead of letting customers just wander around the store, they should have set up temporary barriers and gone back to the old corner shop way of shopping, where customers come in, say what they want at a distance and the assistant goes and gets the stuff for them. I have been saying it for weeks now.
I think we could have reduced contact with people in many, many professions.
I don't know. Did he? Very stupid and naïve if he did.Wasn't the mayor of London pushing the narrative for weeks that you can't contract it on public transport.
I don't know. Did he? Very stupid and naïve if he did.
probably notWasn't the mayor of London pushing the narrative for weeks that you can't contract it on public transport.
I don't know. Did he? Very stupid and naïve if he did.
probably not
No it wasn’t, you are going to see more positive cases due to more testing being done and the death rate doesn’t reflect the current impact of lockdownsHopefully some better news figures wise today, yesterday was a fucking disaster for every country
Uk did less tests yesterday mate and we had nearly double total casesNo it wasn’t, you are going to see more positive cases due to more testing being done and the death rate doesn’t reflect the current impact of lockdowns
Fair enough, that's mental.
We already been through this and it's a shame that people dont read passed the headline.
Exactly it is a shame people don't read articles passed the headlineHe said it after consulting public health England.
Not really a fan of his and don't think he's been pro active enough in finding solutions to the transport issues down there but that comment came after consulting with the experts.
Wasn't the mayor of London pushing the narrative for weeks that you can't contract it on public transport.
He did say it at the start of match after taking advice from pheCant find anything, gone back to March 17th and he was talking about only key workers using it: Mayor Sadiq Khan on London's transport, childcare, schools, hospitals and business
Got a source?
Fair enough, that's mental.
No chanceHopefully some better news figures wise today, yesterday was a fucking disaster for every country
Uk did less tests yesterday mate and we had nearly double total cases
Right, read that, but now I take that coment back of mine. Seems he was just relaying what he had been told by Public Health England.
About 2 days for the swab testYou do realise the tests don’t get turned around in 5 mins don’t you? In fact save it, not being funny but you don’t seem to have any clue at all what’s going on with the figures.
That was before the outbreak started. He was right. When there were 39 cases total there was no risk of catching it.
Tell me, what is it about the Muslim Sadiq Khan that upsets you so much?
ExactlyRight, read that, but now I take that coment back. Seems he was just relaying what he had been told by Public Health England.
Can't blame him for that.
You do realise the tests don’t get turned around in 5 mins don’t you? In fact save it, not being funny but you don’t seem to have any clue at all what’s going on with the figures.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?