SkyBlueDom26
Well-Known Member
How can you expect me to answer that question, i don't make the rulesWhy can't the cut off date be extended to the start of april.from the end of match.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
How can you expect me to answer that question, i don't make the rulesWhy can't the cut off date be extended to the start of april.from the end of match.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Might end up more like a gulag than holiday camp!Noted.
I'm writing a book though so wanna go somewhere nice to bash out some words.
Dom can you try to answer this one without just pulling a date out of thin air.
Why can't the cut off date be extended to the start of april.from the end of match.
Lots of people have fell through the cracks because they were going to change jobs.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
How can you expect me to answer that question, i don't make the rules
That's not an answer. You can actually think about things rather than just being a nodding dog.How can you expect me to answer that question, i don't make the rules
Didn’t you misspell of yesterday?Would help if you spelt it correctly
This is the questionBut theoretically if you were, why can't it be changed?
How can you expect me to answer that question, i don't make the rules
IgouldingDidn’t you misspell of yesterday?
That's not an answer. You can actually think about things rather than just being a nodding dog.
The scheme is massively flawed and while it is welcome they have backtracked on tapering the payments they have missed a massive chance to fix the glaring flaws.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Igoulding
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
BrilliantJust saw a stat if you add furloughed and public sector workers together you’ve now got 49% of all employees being paid by the state!
What are your thoughts on the public opinion that Johnson has handled this appallingly, and has a lower rating than Starmer?
That doesn't seem right. Would leave the scheme massively open to abuse. Surely if someone is working their employer pays them not the government?Really good announcement if I’m reading it correctly. Still 80% of wages paid and no longer requiring staff to not be working? Is that right? My only question is if people are working, wouldn’t they be getting full pay? Little confused.
Interesting watching posters who shouted about how awful socialism was during the election now praising the government for the furlough scheme.Just saw a stat if you add furloughed and public sector workers together you’ve now got 49% of all employees being paid by the state!
That can’t be right, opinion on this thread in no way reflects the real world.
Just saw a stat if you add furloughed and public sector workers together you’ve now got 49% of all employees being paid by the state!
Good to see they've u-turned on the drop to 60% The pressure to end furlough should be made on employers who can afford to do so and are using the scheme as a means of saving themselves money rather than the workers who have been told to stay at home who will be worried if they will even have a job to go back to.
That doesn't seem right. Would leave the scheme massively open to abuse. Surely if someone is working their employer pays them not the government?
Interesting watching posters who shouted about how awful socialism was during the election now praising the government for the furlough scheme.
can you show me a Yougov poll that evidences this
Charles according to you Sir Keith Starter is the labour leader
That can’t be right, opinion on this thread in no way reflects the real world.
lol- I get that he winds you up, but you look a bit overly desperate to get his attention now tbh
YouGov are really bad pollsters as well.Ah your classic response when someone publishes a link that proves your nonsense wrong.
'doesn't count if it's in that publication! Here's the excellent Dan Hodges instead'
I think I'll stick to the UK for now though even in times of crisis and uncertainty their prices are still an absolute piss take.
What book you writing? Fiction, non fiction?
YouGov are really bad pollsters as well.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
This me? If so it is really sad but no he is not coming off ignore.lol- I get that he winds you up, but you look a bit overly desperate to get his attention now tbh
can you show me a Yougov poll that evidences this
Ohhh burnYouGov don’t do daily opinion polls, but on their live ratings tracker Johnson currently sits at -13 with 99 heard of him, Starmer at -4 with 44 heard of. So he’s behind there too.
It's fiction but I'm struggling a bit with it. Loads of great ideas but lack of plan. I'll probably start a separate thread on it.
Indeed like labour in the 70’s
Facts bring him out in a rashNope. At its height the public sector employed just over 7m people in 1979, half a million fewer than are currently claiming furlough.