Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (120 Viewers)

wingy

Well-Known Member
It has it's uses. Boris didn't realise he was being used so Labour could launch an attack on increasing the nhs surcharge without exempting NHS employees which.means the are charging foreign born nhs staff even more to us the nhs they work for.



Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Richie's baby .

Edit:-. Osborne's initiative , Javid's increase .
Richie's obligation to deliver .
 
Last edited:

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Not seen a “this thread isn’t representative of society as a whole” today. Everyone ok?

He's been a bit busier running an embarrassing Twitter parody-though last post on that is 8th May. Think he gave up when the bites stopped coming
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Are you confident they will actually achieve that? Remember Hancock promising to “test 100,000 people per day” by the end of April? Here's the figures for May:

Still not close to the 100,000 a day let alone the 200,000 a day Johnson promised by the end of May.

He gives the impression he is making it up as he goes along, giving any answer that will take the pressure off him. Today he has promised huge pay rises to NHS staff despite the Treasury talking about public sector pay freezes, which one do we believe?
I think it’s a form of Tourette’s. Can’t explain himself so just throws a random number out in hope that the original question goes away. I apologise in advance to anyone who has Tourette’s, it is of course a genuine condition and I don’t think for one minute Boris has it, he’s just a fuckwit.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Pouting out a fact OMG

Facts on here are pointless. You are like King Canute against a forum tide of froth

Of course outside in the real world the tidal wave is not even a trickle in the worlds oceans
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Richie's baby .
It's incredible that Theresa's Home Secretary dogma still prevails
From Cameron's Pship the Chancellor Osborne introduced this scheme and Javid decided he'd double Richy tasked with delivery

Think Boris would benefit from some home studying as well .
Think we're talking much less than £900M to scrap this nauseas scheme .
 
Last edited:

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Basically the Cnut tide analogy would only work as Grenners wanted if Cnut had actually in the story thought he could stop the incoming tide.

I blame the schools

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member


When you do analyse the content...

Its amazing how quickly the 'facts' presented at PMQs, or the daily briefings for that matter, fall apart under the slightest scrutiny,.

Hard to believe that this level of incompetence is possible so you have to assume they throw these 'facts' out knowing more people will hear the lie than will hear the correction.

We desperately need an MP code of conduct where there is some sort of consequence for what is basically outright lying.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I like it when someone uses Wiki and tries to sound clever especially when quoting an alternate spelling from wiki to sound amazingly intelligent - still spelling my name wrong and not understanding that all he’s doing is an anagram competition to describe himself
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
....and litter strewn down every fucking grass verge....

I reckon its time to make drive-thru & take-out customers bring their own crockery & cutlery.....and if they forget, just dump the hot grub & drinks in their lap.

I'd put a 100% surcharge on the cost of it tbh, i have thought this for a long time. I'd do the same for the 'shit in a tray' places, especially ones using those vile polystyrene trays.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Its amazing how quickly the 'facts' presented at PMQs, or the daily briefings for that matter, fall apart under the slightest scrutiny,.

Hard to believe that this level of incompetence is possible so you have to assume they throw these 'facts' out knowing more people will hear the lie than will hear the correction.

We desperately need an MP code of conduct where there is some sort of consequence for what is basically outright lying.
That would make the surcharge 4500 a year.

Boris doesn't do details.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Its amazing how quickly the 'facts' presented at PMQs, or the daily briefings for that matter, fall apart under the slightest scrutiny,.

Hard to believe that this level of incompetence is possible so you have to assume they throw these 'facts' out knowing more people will hear the lie than will hear the correction.

We desperately need an MP code of conduct where there is some sort of consequence for what is basically outright lying.

As long as parliamentary privilege exists then no chance
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I'd put a 100% surcharge on the cost of it tbh, i have thought this for a long time. I'd do the same for the 'shit in a tray' places, especially ones using those vile polystyrene trays.

One place printed the reg number in the trays I didn’t bet it at first but it’s to identify the culprits - clever idea
 

SeaSeeEffCee

Well-Known Member
I like it when someone uses Wiki and tries to sound clever especially when quoting an alternate spelling from wiki to sound amazingly intelligent - still spelling my name wrong and not understanding that all he’s doing is an anagram competition to describe himself
Can't have anyone else encroaching on your niche of constantly trying to sound really clever
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
As long as parliamentary privilege exists then no chance
That only protects from libel.

Misleading the house is still against Erskine may and the ministerial code.

I think he genuinely doesn't have a clue about his own policies and just pulled a number from the air

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Can't have anyone else encroaching on your niche of constantly trying to sound really clever
He's upset because he's thick as mince.

Why wiki the story of Cnut and the tide. It's famous supposed part of English history and was taught at school. He's crying because he is thick.

Also I'm calling him Grenners on purpose.

I look forward to his next analogy about how Alfred under cooked the cakes.



Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
That only protects from libel.

Misleading the house is still against Erskine may and the ministerial code.

I think he genuinely doesn't have a clue about his own policies and just pulled a number from the air

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

That may be his best defence
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Can't have anyone else encroaching on your niche of constantly trying to sound really clever

Blimey look whose shown up what a coincidence
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top