Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (360 Viewers)

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Other half has been up coughing all night. Now I’m 95% confident she just has a cough/cold/other illness but probably better to be safe about it. Gov portal for testing just says “we are very busy, please try again later”. Is that how it’s tended to be when others have tried to book?
Home testing only available in cv3
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Then we make do, I'm lucky enough to work from home but I feel for people who can't.

Appreciate what you’re saying but again this is where the governments messaging has been poor....it’s not that it’s suddenly dangerous to go to work (although for some jobs ie high/close public interaction ie supermarkets it is obviously a higher risk of contageon than others) unless you/your close family are higher risk...the advice/measures are solely to try to slow the spread down again

unfortunately as I say the messaging/reasoning hasn’t been the clearest, then the media/social media whip your further panic and we end up with people locking themselves away (and not getting treatments for more serious diseases/illnesses, getting mental health issues etc etc)
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
I won’t get into the whole testing discussion again. We should have a bit more capacity by now and I believe the government should be working on a referral system online or through 111 again (those with obvious Covid symptoms and/or that have been in close contact with someone who has Covid) not everyone just trying to book a test themselves !

It goes without saying that if everyone is trying to get a test for Covid like symptoms (some similar to cold) no capacity will be enough over autumn/winter.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
I don't really think pertaining risk profiles to individual postcodes in densely population cities makes all that much sense. I'd suggest it should have two levels, Coventry is a high risk place due to having some high risk areas. CV3 is a medium risk in itself but people must exercise caution. The virus doesn't understand postcode boundaries and people don't tend to live, work and socialise within them either.
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
Other half has been up coughing all night. Now I’m 95% confident she just has a cough/cold/other illness but probably better to be safe about it. Gov portal for testing just says “we are very busy, please try again later”. Is that how it’s tended to be when others have tried to book?

Well, after 2 and a bit hours of refreshing, appointments appeared. A fair few of them as well. Seems that it’s not just an 8pm release, so credit where it’s due I suppose.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
I don't really think pertaining risk profiles to individual postcodes in densely population cities makes all that much sense. I'd suggest it should have two levels, Coventry is a high risk place due to having some high risk areas. CV3 is a medium risk in itself but people must exercise caution. The virus doesn't understand postcode boundaries and people don't tend to live, work and socialise within them either.

Nah we're just gonna take a pitchfork to any c**t from Earlsdon who comes our way!
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
I don't really think pertaining risk profiles to individual postcodes in densely population cities makes all that much sense. I'd suggest it should have two levels, Coventry is a high risk place due to having some high risk areas. CV3 is a medium risk in itself but people must exercise caution. The virus doesn't understand postcode boundaries and people don't tend to live, work and socialise within them either.
I’ll pass it on
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Don’t see the issue TBF. Of course only phones with modern tech can support the latest features.

You would think that if you need most people to be able to use the app you would make it so it works on the widest range of phones so yes I see a problem.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
And even then the benefits are still massive in terms of reducing the change of catching it and more importantly passing it on

Their response
Yes I agree but I think they went for simplicity and the idea that you might feel you have more influence over your more local postcode - a "tell your neighbours" principle. I think there's a "smoothing" function over the risk scores so that each postcode's risk is affected by those near to it.
 
Last edited:

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
Sunaks support for business that CAN trade seems a bit patchy....some good, some inadequate....

BUT unless I've missed it, He offers the square root of fuck-all for businesses & sectors who can't currently trade.... WTF?
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
So the wage top scheme means the state will pay a maximum of 22% of salary towards it being the onus is on the employer to pick up the slack.

Can see the bloodbath of job loses being that much effected by this.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
You would think that if you need most people to be able to use the app you would make it so it works on the widest range of phones so yes I see a problem.

You want the government to nip round everyone’s house and upgrade the hardware in their phone to be capable? Or just not release an app at all?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
You want the government to nip round everyone’s house and upgrade the hardware in their phone to be capable? Or just not release an app at all?
I suppose that hinges on whether the app is actually useful at the levels who will take it up, and that level will obviously be less, the less people who are able to take it up.

Now I don't have the answers to that, so I'm not going to comment either way...
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
I suppose that hinges on whether the app is actually useful at the levels who will take it up, and that level will obviously be less, the less people who are able to take it up.

Now I don't have the answers to that, so I'm not going to comment either way...
Even at 15 % it’s effective but not as effective. It’s one of those things if you can convince your networks to use it it will reduce your risk or getting it or passing it on
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Even at 15 % it’s effective but not as effective. It’s one of those things if you can convince your networks to use it it will reduce your risk or getting it or passing it on
Have to say... my networks (parents and many work colleagues) aren't able to download it, because their phone technology is too out of date!

Looks like I'll be bluetoothing away to myself, and Mrs Wisdom (not sure if her phone can do it until she gets home from work!!)

Obviously if out it may have a use.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
You want the government to nip round everyone’s house and upgrade the hardware in their phone to be capable? Or just not release an app at all?

no but phones from 2015 can use qr codes and have bluetooth so you can simplify the process for them
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
So the wage top scheme means the state will pay a maximum of 22% of salary towards it being the onus is on the employer to pick up the slack.

Can see the bloodbath of job loses being that much effected by this.

It sounds an overly complex scheme that will end up impacting the poorest the most, do virtually nothing to protect employment and lead to widespread destitution.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
I suppose that hinges on whether the app is actually useful at the levels who will take it up, and that level will obviously be less, the less people who are able to take it up.

Now I don't have the answers to that, so I'm not going to comment either way...

exactly you need to try and make the app usable by the most people possible
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Their choice was use the tech for those that can or don’t use tech at all. There’s no method to do this type of app on older devices.

Looking at the stats you’re talking maybe 5% of users on iPhone 6 or before, not sure about Android as stats are harder to come across.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top